Individual Economists

DoE Warns Of 100x Increase In Black-Out Risk By 2030 On Same Day As Trump Energy Security EO

Zero Hedge -

DoE Warns Of 100x Increase In Black-Out Risk By 2030 On Same Day As Trump Energy Security EO

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,

The planned retirement of more than 100 gigawatts of power generation capacity by the end of the decade could increase the risk of blackouts in the United States by 100 times, the Department of Energy said in a July 7 statement.

“Allowing 104 GW of firm generation to retire by 2030—without timely replacement—could lead to significant outages when weather conditions do not accommodate wind and solar generation,” the DOE said.

Modeling shows annual outage hours could increase from single digits today to more than 800 hours per year. Such a surge would leave millions of households and businesses vulnerable. We must renew a focus on firm generation and continue to reverse radical green ideology in order to address this risk.”

Firm power generation refers to power that can be generated at all times and includes coal, natural gas, and nuclear. This is in contrast to intermittent power sources such as wind and solar, which are dependent on factors like weather.

The warning is part of the DOE’s Evaluating U.S. Grid Reliability and Security report, which criticized the “radical green agenda of past administrations” for existing generation retirements and delays in adding new firm power generation capacities, according to the statement.

This will lead to a “growing mismatch” between electricity demand and supply, driven especially by demand from AI-driven data center growth, the DOE said in the statement.

If the current schedule of planned retirements and incremental power additions remain unchanged, the country’s electric grid will be “unable to meet expected demand for AI, data centers, manufacturing and industrialization while keeping the cost of living low for all Americans,” the agency added in the statement.

Continuing on the present course will undermine America’s economic growth, leadership in new technologies, and national security, the DOE said.

While the 104 GW in retirements are set to be replaced by 209 GW of new power generation by 2030, only 22 GW of these replacements are set to be firm generation, according to the department.

“The United States cannot afford to continue down the unstable and dangerous path of energy subtraction previous leaders pursued, forcing the closure of baseload power sources like coal and natural gas,” Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said in the statement.

“In the coming years, America’s reindustrialization and the AI race will require a significantly larger supply of around-the-clock, reliable, and uninterrupted power. President Trump’s administration is committed to advancing a strategy of energy addition, and supporting all forms of energy that are affordable, reliable, and secure.”

The DOE report is in response to President Donald Trump’s April 8 executive order calling for strengthening the reliability and security of America’s power grid.

To ensure reliable electric generation in the country and meet the growing demand for electricity, America’s power grid “must utilize all available power generation resources, particularly those secure, redundant fuel supplies that are capable of extended operations,” the order states.

The DOE issued its warning following a May report from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), which cautioned that parts of the United States could struggle to meet electricity demand this summer.

The NERC report cited intermittent energy sources, such as solar and wind, as posing a potential risk to the reliability of the power supply.

Protecting US Energy Security

The DOE report on grid reliability came out on the same day that Trump signed an executive order directing his administration to end “market distorting subsidies for unreliable, foreign controlled energy sources.”

The order directs the secretary of the Treasury to terminate clean electricity production and investment tax credits granted to solar and wind facilities, the White House said in a July 7 fact sheet.

It also directs the secretary of the interior to revise rules to eliminate preferential treatment given to these facilities compared to dispatchable, firm power generation sources.

“Unreliable wind and solar energy sources displace affordable, dispatchable energy, compromise America’s electric grid, and denigrate the beauty of our Nation’s natural landscape,” the fact sheet stated.

“Reliance on so-called ‘green’ subsidies threatens national security by making the United States dependent on supply chains controlled by foreign adversaries.”

Some renewable energy policies are already on the chopping block after Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill into law on July 4.

The bill terminates multiple clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act signed by former President Joe Biden, with some cuts taking effect as early as this year.

The electric vehicle tax credit is now scheduled to end by the end of September. Tax credits for clean energy projects will only be available if the projects are operational by Dec. 31, 2027, or Jan. 1, 2028.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 18:25

Iran 'Rapidly' Beefs Up Air Defenses With Chinese Help After Israel Ceasefire

Zero Hedge -

Iran 'Rapidly' Beefs Up Air Defenses With Chinese Help After Israel Ceasefire

Via Middle East Eye

Iran has taken possession of Chinese surface-to-air missile batteries as Tehran rapidly moves to rebuild defensives destroyed by Israel during their recent 12-day conflict, sources have told Middle East Eye.

The deliveries of Chinese surface-to-air missile batteries occurred after a de-facto truce was struck between Iran and Israel on June 24, an Arab official familiar with the intelligence told MEE.

Via AFP

Another Arab official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive intelligence, said that the US's Arab allies were aware of Tehran's efforts to "back up and reinforce" its air defenses and that the White House had been informed of Iran's progress. 

The officials did not say how many surface-to-air missiles, or SAMs, Iran had received from China since the end of the fighting. However, one of the Arab officials said that Iran was paying for the SAMs with oil shipments.

China is the largest importer of Iranian oil, and the US Energy Information Administration suggested in a report in May that nearly 90 percent of Iran’s crude and condensate exports flow to Beijing.

For several years, China has imported record amounts of Iranian oil despite US sanctions, using countries such as Malaysia as a transshipment hub to mask the crude's origin.

"The Iranians engage in creative ways of trading," the second Arab official told MEE. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump likely heavily discussed Iran and its nuclear program when they meet on Monday. 

MEE reached out to the White House for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. 

Deepening relationship

The shipments mark a deepening of Beijing’s relationship with Tehran and come as some in the West noted that China and Russia appeared to keep a distance from Iran amid Israel's unprecedented attacks.

Israel achieved air superiority over Iran's skies during the conflict, destroying ballistic missile launch pads and assassinating Iranian generals and scientists.

Despite this, the government endured the strikes. It was also able to continue firing ballistic missiles at Israel, decimating several sensitive sites in Tel Aviv and Haifa before a ceasefire took hold.

In the late 1980s, Iran received HY-2 Silkworm cruise missiles from China via North Korea when it was at war with Iraq.

The Islamic Republic used the missiles to attack Kuwait and strike a US-flagged oil tanker during the so-called tanker wars. In 2010, there were reports that Iran received HQ9 anti-aircraft missiles from China.

Iran is believed to use Russia's S-300, which is capable of engaging aircraft and UAVs in addition to providing some cruise and ballistic missile defense capability, as well as older Chinese systems and locally produced batteries such as the Khordad series and the Bavar-373.

These systems are believed to have a limited ability to shoot down the US F-35 stealth warplane that Israel operates.

China already sells its HQ-9 and HQ-16 air defence systems to Pakistan. Egypt is also understood to have China’s HQ-9 system, according to reports.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 17:00

Trump Extends Federal Hiring Freeze Until October

Zero Hedge -

Trump Extends Federal Hiring Freeze Until October

President Donald Trump issued a memorandum on July 7 extending the federal hiring freeze until Oct. 15, while maintaining exemptions for positions related to the armed forces and public safety.

Trump initially imposed a hiring freeze in January, at the start of his second term. It was later extended through July 15.

The president has now ordered another extension as part of an effort to improve the efficiency of federal agencies.

As Aldgra Fredly reports for The Epoch Times, in the recent memo, Trump stated that “no federal civilian position that is presently vacant may be filled, and no new position may be created,” except for roles that are exempted or required by law.

Federal agencies are prohibited from “contracting outside the federal government to circumvent the intent of this memorandum,” while heads of agencies “shall seek efficient use of existing personnel and funds to improve public services and the delivery of those services,” the order stated.

The hiring freeze does not apply to military personnel or positions related to immigration enforcement, national security, and public safety.

It also exempted positions in the executive office of the president.

The memo states that the Office of Personnel Management may continue to grant exemptions from this policy where necessary and that federal agencies may relocate or reassign staff “to meet the highest priority needs” or maintain essential services.

The hiring freeze that began in January was followed by mass layoffs across several federal agencies, with thousands of federal employees opting to leave under a buyout program offered by the Trump administration.

Among the affected agencies is the Department of Veterans Affairs, which announced on July 7 that it has laid off nearly 17,000 workers of its original workforce of 484,000 since January.

The agency stated that another 12,000 employees are expected to leave by the end of September “through normal attrition, voluntary early retirement authority, or the deferred resignation program.”

These reductions in the workforce occurred in the wake of the Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to eliminate fraud and reduce federal spending.

The move has triggered legal action from several states, labor unions, and nonprofit organizations, which alleged that the Trump administration failed to obtain the necessary congressional authorization.

On July 1, District Judge Melissa DuBose ordered a halt to the overhaul of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as the judge found that the layoffs implemented in April likely ran counter to federal law.

The judge granted a preliminary injunction sought by 19 states and the District of Columbia to block the workforce reductions at HHS, ruling that the agency’s actions were “arbitrary and capricious.”

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had earlier planned to lay off about 10,000 workers as part of a restructuring plan to improve the agency’s efficiency.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 16:40

Saudi Arabia Keeps Executing Foreigners On Drug Charges At 'Horrifying' Rate

Zero Hedge -

Saudi Arabia Keeps Executing Foreigners On Drug Charges At 'Horrifying' Rate

Via Middle East Eye

There has been a surge in executions in Saudi Arabia, particularly in relation to drug offences, a new report published by Amnesty International on Monday has revealed.

The kingdom executed 1,816 people between January 2014 and June 2025, according to the official Saudi Press Agency. Of those, nearly one third (597) were for drug-related offences, which may not be punishable by death under international human rights law and norms. Around three quarters of those executed for drug offences were foreign nationals.

Screen grab from video allegedly showing a public beheading in Saudi Arabia. (YouTube/tnycman)

"We are witnessing a truly horrifying trend, with foreign nationals being put to death at a startling rate for crimes that should never carry the death penalty," Amnesty’s Kristine Beckerle said. 

Executions in Saudi Arabia have risen steadily over the past year and a half. In 2024, the kingdom executed 345 people - the highest annual figure that Amnesty has recorded in over three decades. 

So far this year, 180 people have been executed. Last month alone, 46 executions were carried out, 37 of which were for drug-related offences

They were made up of nationals from Egypt, Ethiopia, Jordan, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia and Syria. In January 2021, Riyadh had announced a moratorium on drug related-executions, but that was lifted in November the following year.

'Cruel, inhuman and degrading'

Last month, inmates and their relatives told Middle East Eye that executions could take place “any day”. The men were all from Ethiopia and Somalia and had been convicted of drug trafficking. 

“They have told us to say our goodbyes,” one of the convicted men told MEE. “We were told that executions would begin shortly after Eid al-Adha (5-9 June), and now they have started.”

In its report, Amnesty interviewed the families of 13 inmates on death row, as well as community members and consulate officials. It also reviewed court documents. 

Based on the testimonies and evidence, it concluded that limited levels of education and disadvantaged socio-economic status of foreign nationals increased their risk of exploitation and lack of legal representation. 

The family of 27-year-old Khalid Mohammed Ibrahim, who was put on death row on alleged drug trafficking charges, told MEE it had been a harrowing seven years for the family since he was arrested.

“He tried to enter the country through Yemen,” his older brother Muleta said. “A border guard encouraged him to tell his jailers that he was a drug smuggler, saying it would get him sent to court and quickly cleared since there was no evidence. He believed them.”

In addition to drug offences, Amnesty reported on the use of the death penalty against Saudi Arabia’s Shia minority on “terrorism” related charges

The rights group said that despite Shia communities making up around 12 percent of the Saudi population, they accounted for around 42 percent (120 of 286) of terrorism-related executions since 2014. 

The report added that seven young men currently at risk of execution were under the age of 18 at the time of their alleged offences. 

Imposing the death penalty on those who were minors at the time of the alleged crime is prohibited under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child - a treaty which Saudi Arabia is a state party to. “The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, it should not be used under any circumstances,” said Beckerle.

“In addition to immediately establishing a moratorium on executions, pending full abolition of the death penalty, Saudi Arabia’s authorities must amend national laws to remove the death penalty and commute all death sentences.

“Saudi Arabia’s allies in the international community must exert urgent pressure on the authorities to halt their execution spree and uphold international human rights obligations.”

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 16:20

Credit Card Debt Unexpectedly Plunges As Student Loans Soar: Consumer Credit Update

Zero Hedge -

Credit Card Debt Unexpectedly Plunges As Student Loans Soar: Consumer Credit Update

One month after consumer credit unexpectedly jumped the most in 2025, when it spiked by $17.9 billion (since revised to $16.9 billion) in the month of April, moments ago the Fed released its monthly consumer credit report which showed that the yoyo action in credit-fueled consumer spending continued, and in May while total consumer credit rose a modest $5.1 billion, half of the $10.55 billion expected, it was all on the back of non-revolving credit (i.e., student and car loans). That's because revolving (or credit card) debt slumped by $3.5 billion, the first drop in 2025, and the second biggest monthly decline since covid.

Starting with nonrevolving credit, the monthly change remained sturdy, with the total rising to a new record high of $3.749 trillion...

... although the composition is curious, with auto loans actually shrinking in Q1 by $8.5 billion to $1.555 trillion, while student loans - which for years had flatlined thanks to BIden's repayment moratorium - soared by $27 billion in Q1 to a new record high just over $1.8 trillion, their biggest quarterly increase since the $34.1 billion spent on stuff lessons during the covid pandemic.

But, as noted above, it was revolving credit that was the standout in May and as shown below, credit card debt unexpectedly shrank by $3.5 billion to just under $1.299 trillion. 

Such sudden drops in credit card debt are always concerning and indicative of either a sharp reversal looming in the economy, or households who are stuffed with debt and no longer want - or can get - more credit for purchases. 

We expect to find out which is the right answer in the coming months. 

 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 15:54

"Around Lia, I Wasn't Going To Risk Anything": UPenn Swimmer Breaks Silence

Zero Hedge -

"Around Lia, I Wasn't Going To Risk Anything": UPenn Swimmer Breaks Silence

Authored by Matt Lamb via The College Fix,

A former teammate of William “Lia” Thomas praised the University of Pennsylvania for agreeing to keep men out of women’s locker rooms following negotiations with the Trump administration.

For the first time Monika Burzynska shared her frustrations with her alma mater for letting Lia Thomas, a male, undress and shower alongside female swimmers. Last week, the Trump administration unfroze hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds in exchange for the Ivy League university’s agreement to strip Thomas (pictured above) of his records he took from female swimmers.

The school also agreed to amend its policies to keep locker rooms and bathrooms single sex.

Burzynska shared her story recently with Fox News.

“When that season eventually began, and Thomas became a fixture in the women’s locker room, Burzynska often retreated to the corner of the room to change,” the news outlet reported.

“Other times, Burzynska timed exactly when she changed to coincide with when Thomas showered. Eventually, Burzynska opted to only change in the stalls or in the family locker across the hall.”

The head swimming coach largely ignored her concerns. While the coach called her concerns “valid” he also told her “Lia is changing in your locker room and there’s nothing you could do about it.”

The coach agreed it was “not fair” but asked Burzynska not to share her frustrations but only to talk to him.

The swimmer has a “a deep sense of peace and validation,” now that men won’t be allowed in female locker rooms.

“Not only for me, but for all the girls on the team, for all the girls in the swim world and in the sport world. And I think this decision, it brought back – at least for me – a sense of fairness that had been lost,” Burzynska said. “Women’s records belong to women and that protecting the integrity of women’s sports still matters.”

She shared how she used to have compassion for individuals with gender dysphoria but the Thomas situation changed her view of transgender issues.

“I thought it must be terrible to feel like you’re trapped in the wrong body. Just be so out of touch with who you really are,” Burzynska told Fox News.

“You have these issues that are from afar and you never really quite think they’re going to touch you personally until you’re on a team with Lia Thomas and your locker is directly next to this biological male. And you would have never believed that you’d be facing this issue directly.

“And then when that happens, your views change where you still feel sorry for this person because they’re clearly so deeply lost. But then it turns into more, ‘OK, this is not fair,’”

She said UPenn is staunchly liberal and pro-LGBT, which conflicted with her conservative views.

“And so I was kind of ready to embrace that, that my views wouldn’t be welcomed because I’ve been conservative most of my life,” she said. “My beliefs are grounded in faith.”

Her testimony comports with what Paula Scanlan, another former UPenn swimmer, previously told Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire.

The decision to protect future female athletes from males who claim to be women has drawn praise from civil rights activists.

“UPenn has agreed to right its wrongs, restore records to the rightful female athletes, and issue an apology to the women impacted by the man they allowed to compete as a woman,” Riley Gaines, a former University of Kentucky swimmer, wrote on X.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 15:40

Iran Bats Down Trump's Claim It Asked For Relaunch Of Nuclear Talks

Zero Hedge -

Iran Bats Down Trump's Claim It Asked For Relaunch Of Nuclear Talks

Washington and Tehran continue their tit-for-tat he said/she said exchanges of statements and accusations, but at least they are not trading ballistic missile attacks at the moment.

Iran on Tuesday clarified that it has not requested talks with the United States over its nuclear program, as claimed by US President Donald Trump during his Monday night dinner hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "No request for a meeting has been made on our side to the American side," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei was quoted in Tasnim news agency as saying.

Getty Images

Trump had told reporters, "We have scheduled Iran talks. They want to talk. They want to work something out. They are very different now than they were two weeks ago."

The US President appears to be trying to turn the ceasefire into a total 'win' over Iran's nuclear program, after lingering questions on if the US bomber raids actually destroyed Tehran's nuclear capability.

And there was this: "Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff – also present during the dinner – had even said the meeting could take place in the next week or so," according to Al Jazeera.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has written that "we have good reason to have doubts about further dialogue." Iran for understandable reasons fears that if it were to come to the negotiating table, it could simply get bombed again while thinking that the other side was dialoguing in good faith.

Below is a fuller explanation of where things stand by Middle East war correspondent Elijah Magnier:

Why the West Knows It Can’t Destroy Iran’s Nuclear Program — but the war was aiming to change the ruling system. The CIA and Mossad never actually intend to destroy Iran’s nuclear or missile programs — because they know they can’t. The deeper truth is this: the real target was the ruling system itself, and that effort has failed. Rafael Grossi, head of the IAEA, revealed he visited nuclear facilities 800 meters underground. No bomb in the U.S. arsenal can reach that depth — not even the GBU-57 bunker buster used by B-2 bombers, which barely penetrates 50–60 meters. The Pentagon wouldn’t bomb Esfahan because it knew the attack would fail. The damage to Fordow, at 100 meters deep, is very uncertain and the US knew it. Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was designed with this in mind.

Centrifuges are not vertically stacked like dominoes. They’re distributed, hardened, and concealed. Enriched uranium has been relocated across multiple undisclosed sites. After the strikes, the West isn’t even sure what was damaged and what survived. But the military campaign was only a small part of the plan. For twelve days, the U.S. and Israel launched a full-spectrum regime-change operation. Intelligence networks, spies and collaborators, embedded over decades — dormant cells, saboteurs, assassins, drone teams — were activated. Assassination plots, confusion campaigns, and targeted destabilisation efforts were unleashed across Iran. This wasn’t covert — it was orchestrated in plain view.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hosted the Iranian crown prince, while media platforms in London and Washington amplified opposition figures. A coordinated information war was waged to fracture public trust, deepen unrest, and break the system from within. It failed. Despite the noise, the Islamic Republic withstood it. The leadership structure held firm. The nuclear program wasn’t crippled. The missile infrastructure remains intact. And the West, after unleashing decades of espionage and psychological warfare, was left with almost nothing to show. That’s why the CIA and Mossad don’t talk seriously about “destroying” Iran’s nuclear capacity anymore. Not because they don’t want to — but because they know they can’t. And their attempt to break the system from within has only proven just how durable that system really is.

To demonstrate just how contradictory Trump policy on the Middle East has been...

Despite White House optimism, it's very unlikely that Iran will come to the nuclear negotiating table at this point. And if it does, there's a very slim chance of actual progress. Iran has never backed off its insistence that it be allowed to enrich uranium as a matter of national sovereignty.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 15:20

US Moves To Ban Chinese Purchases Of US Farmland Over National Security Concerns

Zero Hedge -

US Moves To Ban Chinese Purchases Of US Farmland Over National Security Concerns

Authored by Jackson Richman via The Epoch Times,

Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced on July 8 that the United States will be moving to ban Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland over national security concerns.

During a press conference with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and other top officials, Rollins said the Trump administration will work with states and use executive actions to ban ownership of U.S. agriculture by Chinese and nationals of other adversaries.

During a call with reporters on July 7, Rollins acknowledged there was no way for her agency to take back farmland owned by the Chinese and other foreign buyers.

“USDA is not in the role to be able to do that,” she said.

The national security action plan released by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) and obtained by The Epoch Times states that, “Land owned by foreign nationals—particularly those from countries of concern...or other foreign adversaries—is a potential threat to national security and future economic prosperity. USDA will ensure transparency of foreign U.S. agricultural land ownership and pursue robust and overdue updates to data collection, reporting, and analysis.”

The USDA, according to the plan, will implement reforms such as creating an online filing system to require foreign entities to report their holdings and transactions in the U.S. agricultural marketplace.

It will also work alongside Congress and states to pass and implement laws to take “action to end the direct or indirect purchase or control of American farmland by nationals from countries of concern or other foreign adversaries.”

Additionally, the USDA will sign a memorandum of understanding with the Treasury Department to “ensure regular coordination” with the agriculture secretary related to reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) when it comes to foreign transactions involving the agriculture sector, according to the plan.

Rollins announced that she will sit on CFIUS, a panel that reviews foreign purchases for national security risks, beginning July 8.

Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland has been a concern in both the agricultural and national security sectors.

A U.S. Government Accountability Office report in 2024 said that U.S. agencies were in the dark about Chinese ownership of American farmland.

“This report confirms one of our worst fears: that not only is the USDA unable to answer the question of who owns what land and where, but that there is no plan by the department to internally reverse this dangerous flaw that affects our supply chain and economy,” said Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) at the time.

In July 2024, the Biden administration took executive action to shutter Chinese majority-owned MineOne Partners Ltd. and its affiliates.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 15:00

BlackRock's ETF Holdings Top 700,000 Bitcoin; Far Above Saylor's 'Strategy'

Zero Hedge -

BlackRock's ETF Holdings Top 700,000 Bitcoin; Far Above Saylor's 'Strategy'

BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund has just crossed over 700,000 BTC in assets under management, far surpassing Michael Saylor's stash at (Micro)Strategy...

"New milestone… iShares Bitcoin ETF now holds over 700,000 BTC," Nate Geraci, president of NovaDius Wealth Management (formerly The ETF Store), said.

"*700,000* in 18 months. Ridiculous."

ETF inflows continue to build...

In just 18 months, IBIT's AUM topped $75 billion; an achievement that took GLD (the gold ETF) over 15 years to achieve...

As The Block reports, the combined assets held by all U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs are now at approximately 1.25 million BTC ($135 billion), according to CoinGlass data - nearly 6% of bitcoin's total 21 million supply.

IBIT accounts for approximately 56% of that AUM alone - greater than Strategy's 597,325 BTC ($65 billion) stack, for comparison.

Meanwhile, as CoinTelegraph reports, US Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, combined with Michael Saylor’s Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, have purchased more Bitcoin than the supply generated by miners almost every month so far this yearaccording to Galaxy Research.

Strategy and the US Bitcoin ETFs have collectively bought Bitcoin worth $28.22 billion in 2025, while Bitcoin miners’ net new issuance has amounted to $7.85 billion during the same period.

As of June, the combined entities have bought more Bitcoin than the new supply being generated each month, except in February, when the combined entities sold Bitcoin worth $842 million.

All of which supports the trend higher in bitcoin along with global liquidity surging...

...and increased adoption, with US leading UK and EU...

Deutsche Bank's recent survey shows younger, high-earning respondents continue to have the highest adoption.

Male consumers boast a higher adoption rate and believe they have a better understanding of crypto vs. female consumers.

But, despite regulatory breakthroughs, lack of understanding and high risk continue to rank as the top barriers for crypto usage.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 14:40

Oil Markets Are Tighter Than They Look

Zero Hedge -

Oil Markets Are Tighter Than They Look

Authored by Neil Crosby via OilPrice.com,

  • Diesel spreads and refinery margins are no longer reliable on their own for gauging oil demand, as extreme weather and supply chain issues distort short-term signals.

  • Refinery closures in the West and lagging new capacity in Asia are creating regional imbalances, with physical tightness building despite weak headline indicators.

  • China’s slowing demand and India’s rise as a refining hub, combined with “missing barrels” and potential new US sanctions, could drive unexpected bullish shifts in oil markets

The global oil market has entered a period of increasing volatility, with unpredictable supply, deceptive demand signals, and factors such as geopolitical uncertainty and souring economic sentiment all tugging at prices. 

Crude flat prices have been somewhat volatile but have on the whole suffered over the last month or two. Diesel timespreads (or “spreads”), which measure the physical need either to store barrels or release barrels from storage, have historically been a reliable indicator of broader market trends and of economic growth. Recent disruptions, however, suggest that traders must look beyond even this proxy to understand the evolving landscape fully. What’s more, the increasing complexity of supply chains, the rise of alternative energy sources, and shifting regulatory frameworks further complicate market assessments, making a more comprehensive approach to analysis essential.

Disruptions in short-term market indicators

Over the past few months, diesel spreads probably failed as a reliable indicator of medium-term oil demand. A major driver of this distortion was extreme weather conditions in Europe and North America. Cold spells, more frequent and severe than in previous years, led to increased heating fuel demand and logistical disruptions. This distorted pricing signals, creating regional shortages and surpluses that do not necessarily align with average conditions in the market expected through the year. Furthermore, ongoing supply chain constraints and transportation inefficiencies have exacerbated these distortions, making it increasingly difficult to predict market trends using conventional indicators alone.

Recent market indicators illustrate this complexity. The March ICE Gas oil contract expired at an exceptionally high level of “backwardation” at roughly +$20 per tonne, suggesting significant tightness in the physical market. This contradicts other market movements, such as the so-called "Trump Slump," which drove crude flat prices down substantially over parts of Q1, alongside US equities (crude has since made some recovery on supply concerns brought about by US sanctions on Iran and Venezuela).

Diesel cracks, a measure of the economics of refining crude into diesel, weakened from $21 per barrel to below $17 since mid-February, leading some to conclude that the market is beginning to reflect an oversupply issue. However, a deeper analysis of current spreads, particularly post-winter, as well as refinery economics, suggests that fundamentals may not be as bearish as headline numbers imply.

The key indicators traders should watch

While diesel spreads this winter likely overestimated medium-term oil demand and the broader state of global economic growth, they still remain a more reliable indicator than the crude flat price, particularly with cold weather impacts fading. In fact crude oil, diesel, and other fuels markets are “backwardated”, which signals little incentive or need to store barrels. A contango structure, which incentivises storage, has not been observed for an extended period, reinforcing the view that immediate supply/demand conditions are not overly loose. This divergence between futures market pricing and physical market pricing highlights the importance of a multi-layered approach to analysis.

Refinery margins provide another critical signal. Despite broader economic concerns, margins remain historically healthy, even after a sentiment-driven sell-off in diesel cracks specifically (since diesel demand in theory suffers the most during a recession). High sulphur fuel oil and naphtha cracks are also strong, indicating a need for maintaining high refinery operating rates.

This comes at a time when the refining sector is already facing a significant reduction in capacity and with little evidence thus far of a demand collapse implied by markets. Approximately 400,000 barrels per day of refining capacity will be lost in Europe due to upcoming closures, including Grangemouth and several German refineries. In the US, LyondellBasell's Houston refinery has already shut down, and further closures are possible later in the year on the US West Coast.

Refinery closures and their market impact

One of the critical unknowns in the months ahead is the extent to which refinery closures are already priced into the market. While traders actively factor in expected changes, the full impact of these closures may not be realised until inventories begin to decline. Much attention has been paid to the new Dangote refinery in Nigeria, which has almost fully ramped up already. This additional capacity should be offset by losses elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere.

A key signal to watch will be the arbitrage movement of Middle Eastern & Indian barrels to Europe. Over the past few months, Europe has not had to rely heavily on Middle Eastern imports. However, if these arbitrage routes reopen consistently (via prices), that will be indication of tightening conditions and an increasing need for external supply. Refinery closures often have a lagging impact, as inventories act as a buffer in the initial stages. However, supply constraints will likely become more apparent as stocks deplete, particularly in distillate markets.

Supply chains may also be whip-sawed by renewed tensions in the Red Sea. The trade route through the Suez Canal, closed off due to Houthi attacks for some time now, had looked likely to reopen more completely in recent weeks, drastically cutting diesel transit times to Europe. But recent renewed tensions look likely to cut the nascent recovery short.

The refining sector's response

With steady demand at least for now, the Western Hemisphere's refining sector is positioned for a period of moderate bullishness. Strong margins should incentivise refiners to maximise throughput where possible, but this will not be enough to fully offset the lost capacity. As a result, regional imbalances are likely to persist, contributing to localised price volatility and disruptions in supply chains. All this is also ultimately bullish for the outright price of oil.

What is more, new refining capacity in China is unlikely to alleviate global supply constraints significantly. Many of the country's additions are focused on petrochemical feedstock production rather than diesel and gasoline output. Furthermore, China's long-term strategy involves rationalising its refining sector, particularly in Shandong, by phasing out older units. Consequently, while new capacity is coming online, its net contribution to the global supply of road fuels will be less than expected.

India is another country to watch here and it continues to expand its refining footprint, positioning itself as a growing force in the global downstream market. However, the extent to which Indian refining capacity can offset declines in other regions remains uncertain, and some domestic supply will go to servicing domestic growth in oil demand – India is one of the primary sources of global growth here.

China's slowing growth and India's rise

The shifting dynamics of Chinese oil demand growth remain a significant uncertainty for global markets. While official statistics are often unreliable, crude import data provides a clearer picture of underlying trends. In 2024, China experienced a notable slowdown in oil imports, exerting downward pressure on the crude market. Given China's dominant position in global seaborne crude imports, a decline of 500,000 to one million barrels per day has significant market implications, however the market managed to absorb these losses reasonably well.

At the end of 2024, Chinese agencies forecasted another substantial decline in domestic gasoil demand for 2025. This raises two possible scenarios: China will reduce crude imports again, creating a bearish environment for crude prices, or it will increase refined product exports, weighing on refining margins elsewhere. While neither scenario has fully materialised yet, this remains a key factor to watch for global markets, and also with respect to ongoing stimulus efforts from the Chinese government.

The 'missing barrel' phenomenon

One persistent challenge in oil market analysis is the so-called 'missing barrel' phenomenon, the discrepancy between reported supply figures and observable market conditions. Year to date, the inventory picture looks substantially tighter than official supply vs demand statistics and forecasts suggest.

This discrepancy complicates market outlooks, as some traders base decisions on official data while others rely on observed physical conditions. The timespread structure is the most reliable way to cut through this noise. A highly backwardated market reflects more genuine tightness in physical supply, regardless of what balance sheets suggest. With this in mind, any successful ratcheting up of efforts to cut down on oil exports from Venezuela and Iran as part of US foreign policy would be a bullish black swan scenario for the market this year.

Macroeconomic developments, particularly trade policies and potential tariff escalations, which could alter global end-user demand patterns, will eventually shape the market, but over the course of the next few quarters. While economic concerns continue to dominate sentiment, supply-side factors, especially refining capacity reductions, will likely support product prices in the near term.

In this environment, traders must go beyond traditional indicators and focus on real-time physical market conditions. With structural tightness persisting in multiple product markets, the broader narrative of weakening oil demand may not hold up for long under closer scrutiny.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 14:20

Amazon Prime Day Kicks Off With Disappointing Early Sales

Zero Hedge -

Amazon Prime Day Kicks Off With Disappointing Early Sales

U.S. consumer health remains a mixed picture. Goldman Sachs sees signs of cautious optimism, while UBS highlights a rebound in confidence among low-income households. Still, stubborn inflation and high interest rates persist, casting a dark cloud over long-term outlooks.

New data from Momentum Commerce offers an early snapshot of Amazon's Prime Day performance, with sales down 14% in the first four hours compared to the same period last year, according to Bloomberg. It's not the kind of number investors were hoping to see as a high-frequency snapshot of midsummer consumer sentiment, and it may signal deeper caution among shoppers. 

Momentum Commerce, which manages $7 billion in Amazon sales across brands like Crocs and Beats, provides uniquely valuable data often viewed as a barometer of consumer sentiment and the broader U.S. economic outlook. Investors appeared to take the report negatively, with Amazon shares down 1.5% in early afternoon trading in New York. 

Bloomberg noted weaknesses could be attributed to:

  • Prime Day expanded from 2 to 4 days this year, complicating year-over-year comparisons.

  • Consumers may be waiting for deeper discounts. 

  • Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration are discouraging deep sales from sellers, unable to capture sales from value-seeking consumers. 

Other observations of the sale:

  • Amazon's own devices, like Echo, saw fewer discounts this year.

  • Essentials, not tech, are driving competition, with deep discounts on groceries rather than electronics. So, back to basics.

  • Apple offered standout deals, including AirPods 4 at $89, cheaper than last Black Friday.

Ah, yes, the usual malarkey from Amazon sellers... 

Consumers aren't rushing to panic-buy junk from China on the e-commerce platform. While multiple factors may be at play, one undeniable reality remains: as we've noted repeatedly, the consumer is still under pressure. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 14:00

Ugly, Tailing 3Y Auction Sees Record Directs As Foreign Demand Slides

Zero Hedge -

Ugly, Tailing 3Y Auction Sees Record Directs As Foreign Demand Slides

With bond long-ends blowing up across the globe, driven by among other things, justified fears of a looming surge in supply, moments ago the US Treasury sold $58 billion in 3Y notes. And while the auction consisted of relatively low duration paper, one could feel modest cracks in demand all the way near the front-end of the curve.

Here's what happened: the auction prices at a high yield of 3.891%, this was about 9bps lower from the 3.972% last month, but it tailed the When Issued 3.887% by 0.4bps, the same tail as June and the 4th tail in the past 5 auctions.

The bid to cover was also subpar at 2.51, down from 2.52 last month, and the lowest since April as well as below the six-auction average of 2.61. 

It was the internals that were most notable however, with Indirects awarded 54.1%, the lowest since Dec 2023, and with Dealers getting 16.5%, in line with the 15.1% recent average, Directs were left with a whopping 29.4%, the highest on record as they salvaged today's auction which saw foreign bidders fade away.

Overall, this was an ugly, tailing 3Y auction which saw foreign demand slump and only the record surge in Directs managed to avoid what would have been a very ugly outcome to the short-end of the yield curve on a day when the long-end is already blowing up.

Not surprisingly, 10Y yields are trading near session highs with the news of the ugly auction not helping one bit. 

 

 

 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 13:47

Illiquid, Overvalued

Zero Hedge -

Illiquid, Overvalued

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

As "dip buyers" get eviscerated, more dominos fall, and at a tipping point, the herd realizes the tide has reversed and it's time to sell--but alas, it's too late.

Illiquid, Overvalued describes a great many assets that are on the books as "rock-solid investments." Illiquidity means there are few if any buyers for the asset being offered for sale, and this can arise from various conditions.

1. Credit is tight and expensive, limiting the pool of potential buyers to those with cash.

2. Nobody wants the assets because they're grossly overvalued.

3. The pool of buyers with the expertise and financial backing needed to buy the asset is inherently limited.

4. "Animal spirits" have left the room and buyers are "on strike" due to caution / fear of future losses.

Bill Ackman outlined some useful principles of illiquidity in a recent commentary on X in his discussion of the illiquid nature of many assets held by Ivy league university endowment funds:

"Harvard's endowment is principally invested in illiquid private assets including real estate, private equity, and venture capital funds.

Real estate and private equity funds are highly levered so relatively small changes in asset values can have a large impact on equity values. For example, if a real estate fund's asset values decline by 15% and the assets are levered 60%, the fund's equity value will decline by 37.5%.

The increase in cap rates and interest rates have impaired real estate and private equity asset values. These funds do not generally mark to market as public assets are marked leading to a wide disparity between public values and private values when overall values decline.

Venture funds generally mark their assets to the last round valuation so these marks can also be overstated as these values can become stale.

I believe that a substantial part of the reason why many private assets remain private despite the stock market near all time highs is that the public market will value private assets at lower values than they are being carried at privately."

In other words, assets held privately can be "marked to fantasy" because they're not exposed to the market's appraisal of their liquidity and value, which are two sides of one coin: if nobody has the cash and willingness to buy the asset, its value is essentially zero, regardless of its "book value."

When Alan Greenspan issued his mea culpa in late 2013 about missing the subprime mortgage implosion and the resulting Global Financial Meltdown (Why I Didn't See the Crisis Coming Foreign Affairs), he identified two sources of his failure to "see it coming":

1. He assumed markets would remain liquid, i.e. that a buyer would emerge for every seller

2. The total failure of everyone's sophisticated models to predict the collapse of confidence.

The core failure lay in the models' reliance on the notion that humans make decisions rationally as Homo economicus, when the reality is we are extremely prone to irrational exuberance (a.k.a. running with the euphorically greedy herd) and panic (running off the cliff with the herd). He invoked Keynes famous "animal spirits" as the missing variable in economic models.

Irrational "animal spirits" generate "tail risk," events that supposedly happen only rarely but when they do happen, they trigger outsized consequences, and the Fed's models failed to accurately account for "tail risk" because they happen more often than statistical models predict.

All this boils down to illiquidity caused by a panic-button urgency to sell and a profound reluctance to buy: When "animal spirits" are confident in ever-higher asset valuations, participants place a constant bid under the market because prices will keep going up so I'll make more money. This constant bid is called liquidity: cash is flowing into the asset class, be it stocks or housing or cryptocurrencies or commodities.

When "animal spirits" turn to panic, sellers rush to sell as buyers vanish as they fear that prices will keep going down so I'll lose more money. Buying into a downtrend is known as "catching the falling knife": the initial "buy the dip" players have their heads handed to them on a platter, and those on the sidelines decide not to try to catch the falling knife.

This is an illiquid market: the bid keeps dropping until buyers are willing to gamble that "this is the bottom." But should asset prices continue sliding after an initial euphoric pop higher--"the bottom is in, buy!"--then those who held back find their caution reinforced: that wasn't the bottom after all, and everyone who jumped in lost money.

As every surge of "buy the dip" players loses, the market goes bidless--everyone who wanted to play "catch the falling knife" has been burned, and those who have lost the "animal spirits" to gamble stay out. Bids (offers to buy) dry up and asset prices crash to levels no one in the greed-euphoria stage could imagine were even remotely possible.

Those who follow liquidity assume that the more cash sloshing around the system, the more money will flow into assets. But this assumes participants are rational and prices are "fair value". When panic takes hold of the herd, no matter how much cash is sloshing around, none of it will be gambled on a losing bet.

Take a look at this chart of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble, and note the bubble symmetry: what shot up soon plummeted back to pre-bubble levels. Stocks that had reached $60 per share were recommended as "buys" at $45--a rational play perhaps, but wildly off the mark, as the stock eventually bottomed at $4.

When sellers desperate to sell swamp buyers, prices decline. If bids dry up, prices crash.

There is a domino-like effect to euphoria /liquidity turning to caution and then to panic / illiquidity. When overvalued illiquid private assets are sold at huge discounts, this topples the first domino of caution in professional money managers, who then move to sell the overvalued assets on their books to credulous "retail" investors and overseas buyers.

As "dip buyers" get eviscerated, more dominos fall, and at a tipping point, the herd realizes the tide has reversed and it's time to sell--but alas, it's too late.

The Federal Reserve can pump billions of dollars of credit "liquidity" into the financial system, but if nobody wants to "catch the falling knife," the credit will just sit there untouched, as everyone who was dumb enough to borrow money and gamble it away--leaving the debt still to pay--has already been wiped out.

Illiquid and overvalued: two sides of the same coin.

*  *  *

Check out my new book Ultra-Processed Life and my new fiction/novels page.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Subscribe to my Substack for free

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 12:45

NY Fed Inflation Expectations Tumble To Pre-Tariff Levels, As Consumer Sentiment Blossoms

Zero Hedge -

NY Fed Inflation Expectations Tumble To Pre-Tariff Levels, As Consumer Sentiment Blossoms

So much for the Democrats' panic that the US is about to be hit with hyperinflation (because Toyota is footing US tariff costs). 

Moments ago, the NY Fed reported that consumer expectations for future inflation have return to levels last seen at the beginning of the year, before the announcement of aggressive new tariffs, as the fake panic that Trump is about to spark the same runaway inflation that his predecessor unleashed, fade away. 

The June survey showed median expectations for consumer price increases one year ahead decreased for the second straight month in June, falling back to 3%, back to where they were at the end of 2024 and before Trump had launched his tariff strategy. Estimates for annualized inflation three and five years ahead remained unchanged at 3% and 2.6%. Inflation uncertainty, or the uncertainty expressed regarding future inflation outcomes, decreased at the one- and three-year-ahead horizons and was unchanged at the five-year-ahead horizon

Median home price growth expectations remained unchanged at 3.0%. This series has been moving in a narrow range between 3.0% and 3.3% since August 2023.

Median year-ahead commodity price change expectations increased by 1.5 percentage points for gas to 4.2%, by 1.9 percentage points for the cost of medical care to 9.3% (the highest level since June 2023), by 1.6 percentage points for the cost of college education to 9.1%, and by 0.7 percentage point for rent to 9.1%. Median year-ahead expected change in food prices remained unchanged at 5.5%.

Overall household sentiment also benefited, as unemployment and job loss expectations improved. To wit, mean unemployment expectation, or the mean probability that the U.S. unemployment rate will be higher one year from no, decreased by 1.1 percentage point to 39.7%...

... while the mean perceived probability of losing one’s job in the next 12 months decreased by 0.8% to 14.0%, the lowest level since December 2024. The decrease was broad-based across age and education groups

Median one-year-ahead earnings growth expectations fell by 0.2 percentage point to 2.5% in June, remaining below its 12-month trailing average of 2.8%. The series has been moving within the range between 2.5% and 3.0% since May 2021

While spending growth expectations slightly declined, household income growth expectations increased: the median expected growth in household income increased by 0.2 percentage point to 2.9% in June, equaling its 12-month trailing average.

Households were also more optimistic about their year-ahead financial situations and credit access

Finally, after sliding to a record low 33.8% in March, household expectations for higher stock prices one year from now rose to 36.0%...

... and while expectations for growth in government debt also rose to a 7.3% annual increase, the highest since October, the real number will be much, much higher now that Trump's BBB (and future US credit rating) has passed.

 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 12:25

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Zero Hedge -

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

A little over a month ago, we first (and the Economist about a month later), summarized the plight of Japan's soaring inflation and contracting economy with one word: rice.... well, technically it was a few more words. This is what we said:

What is ironic, is that Japan does not actually have high core inflation; it does however have soaring rice prices which have skewed inflation expectations across the population as rice is a huge component of the overall CPI basket. Meanwhile the BOJ is scrambling to contain inflation - which has tumbled ex food with real wages near record lows - and is tightening conditions by raising rates even though it has zero control over food inflation. However, as a by product of its monetary policies and strong yen, the bond market is crashing every day now, and soon this bond crash will spread to Japan's banks and global markets, sparking a global crisis.  

TL/DR: Japan will unleash the next financial crash because the Japanese are now poor farmers.

Fast forward to today when, with just two weeks until a critical election in Japan, attention is finally turning to this most important commodity for Japan... and perhaps the world. And it starts with Japan's Nikkei profiling what we said was ground zero of Japan's inflation crisis: rice farmers. 

On a lush green plain bordered by mountains in northern Japan's Yamagata prefecture, Nobuhiko Kurosawa does what 20 generations of his family have done before him: He grows rice. There is, however, a problem. 

Tending to seedlings under a piercing June sun, Kurosawa finds himself in territory unfamiliar to his predecessors. A shortage of the commodity kickstarted by an extreme 2023 heat wave and compounded by an inability of the zombified, extremely heavily-subsidized local rice industry to quickly adapt to changing conditions, has sent rice prices skyrocketing, doubling within a year. 

That shortage has brought rationing of sales in big-city supermarkets and made the humble staple of the Japanese diet the focus of a fierce cost-of-living debate in a campaign for an election to the upper house of parliament on July 20. Were the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to lose its existing majority in the upper house, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's position could be at risk, sparking a political crisis in Japan that could have profound consequences for both fiscal and monetary policy, not only in Japan but across the globe.

From his 30 hectares of paddies, Kurosawa supplies rice far and wide, from a nearby rice ball shop to businesses across Japan and overseas.

"We received inquiries from new customers, but we were unable to sell to them because we already had contracts with existing customers," he told Nikkei Asia. "Our company also experienced a shortage of rice, and last year we had no choice but to narrow down our business partners before the summer."

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Ishiba leads his conservative LDP toward the upper house elections with moribund approval ratings hovering in the mid-30% range, and inflation identified as the biggest issue of concern among survey respondents, according to a Nikkei/TV Tokyo poll. Just like in the US before Trump crushed Kamala Harris in every battleground state. 

Having lost its majority in lower house elections under Ishiba's stewardship last year, the LDP, the dominant force in Japanese politics for much of the last 70 years, needs to hold on to the slim majority it holds in the upper house, with a coalition partner, or face daunting challenges in pursuing a policy program as a minority administration in both houses. If the LDP performs poorly, Ishiba's premiership will be in doubt, the Nikkei warns. 

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, left, speaks at a meeting on stabilizing rice supply, flanked by recently appointed Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, July 1.

He faces a daunting uphill climb: the outrage around the soaring price of rice - hitting its highest this year for 30 years - has coursed through mainstream and social media debate in Japan for months. Recently even Donald Trump weighed in, criticizing Japan for not agreeing in increasingly tough trade talks to tackle the crisis by importing more U.S. rice, a move that would be viewed in a dim light by Japan's farming lobby, a key LDP electoral base. It would, however, send the price of rice plunging, demonstrating once again just why government subsidies are always a two-edged sword.

"The rice shortage that began in the summer of 2024 was due to a shortage of rice produced in 2023," according to Masayoshi Honma, distinguished professor at the Asian Growth Research Institute. "To compensate for this, advance purchases of 2024 crop rice have also occurred, driving up prices."

Last year, demand for rice also surged due to the growing number of foreign visitors to Japan - a record 37 million - thanks to the plunging yen (which in turn sparked a burst of non-rice inflation higher) as well as a growing appetite for dining out and the relative affordability of rice compared to bread and noodles, said Kunio Nishikawa, a professor at Ibaraki University specializing in agricultural economics. Overall, Nishikawa calculates, "a supply-demand gap" of approximately 440,000 tons developed, an amount he estimates to be the equivalent of 1.8 months' rice sales volume at supermarkets nationwide in Japan.

Since then, Japanese television news and talk shows have been filled with daily reports on people waiting in lines to buy rice, how to cook old rice so that it still tastes good and politicians' statements about rice. In May a furor engulfed the then-agriculture minister after he said he had never bought rice himself as it was always presented to him as a gift by supporters.

Former prime ministerial aspirant Shinjiro Koizumi, a rising star in the LDP and son of a former premier, was swiftly appointed agriculture minister with a brief to get a grip on the rice crisis. Koizumi immediately pledged to halve rice prices to 2,000 yen ($14) per 5 kilograms, releasing government-stockpiled supplies in late May. Emergency stockpile sales, however, were promptly halted just hours later, after retailers snapped up all they could buy in apparent rationing amid soaring demand Still, shelves in the capital Tokyo are frequently empty as of early July as stores sell out, often rationing sales to one bag per family per day.

Which goes back to what we said almost two months ago: because the Japanese have become poor rice farmers, a global financial may be imminent. Some more background.

While many in Japan seek out rice for daily consumption, as the world's fourth-biggest economy has developed (not to mention aged), so too have tastes for fancier and foreign foods. Demand for rice as a staple has dropped over recent decades to levels well below those seen in developing economies - to 73.5 kilograms per capita in 2022, according to World Population Review, equal to a third of Vietnam's consumption. 

As production of staple rice for Japanese consumers has fallen broadly in line with the demand decline in recent decades, production of rice for other uses - including animal feedstock and a small amount of exports - has begun to take off.

Shunsuke Orikasa, chief researcher at the Distribution Economics Institute of Japan, points out that as a result of a prolonged surplus of rice before 2023, "The price of rice had fallen to the point where producers would incur losses if they continued to grow rice as usual. For farmers, it was more profitable to switch to producing rice for non-staple use as instructed by the government and receive subsidies for it, so they moved toward reducing the amount of rice produced for the table."

And then prices exploded.

Back in Yamagata, farmer Kurosawa said the delicate staple rice supply-demand balance has been upended. "Japan has been producing just enough to meet demand, so the extreme heat of the year before last was too much to handle," he said.

On the other end of the supply chain, consumers are also concerned about the long term. A 26-year-old man living in Tokyo told Nikkei Asia he used to eat rice every day, but has changed habits due to the rise in rice prices since last summer.

People line up outside a store in Tokyo before opening hours to buy rice released from government stockpiles, June 1.

"I've started eating pasta and udon noodles instead of rice, and I buy rice less often," he said. While he welcomed lower prices since Agriculture Minister Koizumi was appointed, "I can't say I approve of him because I don't know what will happen to rice prices in the long term, and I don't plan to go to vote."

A 54-year-old woman living in Kanagawa Prefecture to the west of Tokyo said she also now shops differently. "The branded rice I used to buy online became too expensive, so I stopped buying it," she said.  "However, since rice is something I eat every day, I now buy rice sold at a nearby cheap supermarket."

She welcomed Koizumi's intervention, saying, "If he had not been in power, we would have had to buy rice at a higher price, so I'm grateful." But she added, "I don't want the LDP to become a one-party system, so I won't vote for them."

There is some good news: according to Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, the average price of rice at supermarkets dropped 3.0% in the week to June 22, the latest date for which numbers are available, versus the previous week. But the news is mostly bad: at 3,801 yen per 5kg bag, the price was still up 71% year-on-year, although granted the price had been twice as high as the same period last year until recently.

Japan's image as a global giant in rice is rooted in history: According to U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization data, it was the world's fifth-biggest producer in 1970, but by 2020 it was in 11th position, one rank behind the U.S.

That decline began when Japan's government implemented a policy of reducing staple rice production to maintain prices, starting around 1970, in part to retain the support of the farming lobby for the LDP, which has been in power for all but a few years since the mid-1950s. Although the policy was abolished in 2018, production adjustments continued through the system, such as subsidies for converting to other crops such as feed rice.

 

Yoshihisa Godo, professor at Meiji Gakuin University, said that what Japan is now dealing with is not a "rice shortage," but a "shortage of staple rice." The conversion of staple rice paddies to other crops has progressed, and the area of non-staple rice paddies has increased to more than 10% of total rice cultivation, according to Godo.

Amid the change in the rice business, the role of Japan Agriculture (JA), the national cooperative organization through which many farmers do business, is changing. Kazuhiro Koutsusa, a former JA employee and agricultural management consultant, said the percentage of rice sold through agricultural co-ops has declined significantly compared to several decades ago. Farmers can now communicate with buyers while working in the fields, finding customers themselves thanks to the spread of mobile phones, social media and the internet.

While the current staple rice price is roughly double that of last year, it remains at the same level as 30 years ago. In fact, Shigeru Someya, a rice farmer in Chiba Prefecture near Tokyo, said, "The rice prices of just a few years ago were less than half of what they were 30 years ago."

Over the past few decades, the cost of machinery, materials, and fertilizers used in rice farming has risen, Someya said. At the time, the selling price of rice not only failed to increase but actually declined. Along with industrialization in adjacent areas offering new job prospects, that contributed to many abandoning rice farming. Someya currently cultivates rice on approximately 155 hectares of paddies, but the expansion of his operation was made possible by the fact that around 350 to 400 farming households that used to operate around his farm ceased rice production.

* * * 

The government's efforts to tackle rice price rises have been met with skepticism from the rice industry, with farmers and experts dismissing them as merely election-year measures that don't address structural problems.

"Everything Koizumi is doing is election strategy; he is not talking about fundamental reform," said Asian Growth Research Institute professor Honma, and he is right: what Koizumi is doing is literally identical to what Joe Biden did when he drained half of the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve to keep gas prices low in 2022 and 2023.

For the Distribution Economics Institute of Japan's chief researcher Orikasa, the issue has wider implications. "From a broader perspective, the government's attempt to control the price of a specific commodity in a free market economy is a challenge to capitalism," he said.

Farmer Someya, meanwhile, expressed concern about Koizumi's introduction of a standard price of 2,000 yen per 5kg bag. "While the government might say, 'It's 2,000 yen because it's stockpiled rice,' consumers might come to see 2,000 yen as the standard price even for new rice," Someya said.

In the meantime, Japanese consumers are showing greater interest in imported rice than ever before, indicating a potential solution at least for buyers. Imports of staple food rice, subject to high tariffs, exceeded 10,000 metric tons for the first time in May, an increase of 126 times from the monthly average last year, according to data from the Ministry of Finance.

Aeon, Japan's largest retailer, began selling blends of Japanese and American rice in April. In early June, it started selling California-grown Calrose rice, which it says is "selling better than expected."

Reflecting at the end of a long day in his Yamagata paddies, farmer Kurosawa didn't hide his concern for the future.

"The Japanese government has already released most of its rice reserves, so if this summer turns out to be as hot as the year before last, it could be disastrous," he said. "If we have no reserves left and the quality of the rice has deteriorated due to the extreme heat, Japan may have to import a considerable amount. The food problem is not [just] a problem for farmers, but a problem for everyone who eats."

At that time, Japan's rice inflation - which also happens to be a component of the country's core CPI - will explode and spark total chaos at the BOJ which will be scrambling to hike rates just because Japan's farmers are unable to feed the country's giant appetite for rice; in the process they will spark an economic depression.

Turning to the political dimension of the rice crisis, Bloomberg chimes in and writes that "a shortage of rice in Japan has caused the price of the household staple to surge, exacerbating the country’s cost of living challenges and fueling resentment among the population."

As of June, a 5-kilogram bag of rice cost on average ¥4223 ($29.15) — almost double what it did a year ago. In some cases schools have cut back on the days they serve rice for lunch. Shops and restaurants have hiked the prices of their rice dishes.

A year ago, a 5kg bag of rice cost about ¥2,130. In May this year it had doubled to roughly ¥4,280.

With people angry over the record high prices, the issue has the potential to inflict damage on Ishiba and the ruling Liberal Democratic Party in elections this July.  

The problem for Japan is that the outrage against Ishiba comes at a crucial time for Japan (the world's most indebted nation by far): when it is facing a domestic fiscal crisis, coupled with trade war with the US.

In a note published today by SocGen's Jin Kanzaki (available to pro subscribers), the strategist reminds us that the Upper House election is scheduled for 20 July, and writes that following the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly election held on 22 June, the LDP is no longer the largest party there. However, both the cabinet's and the ruling party’s (LDP and Komeito) approval ratings in early June rose by 6.0 and 4.7%, respectively, from May. This rise is thought to be due to a degree of appreciation for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister Koizumi's efforts to lower rice prices, namely dumping emergency stockpiled rice at low prices (in the process assuring much higher prices in the long-term). However, a survey conducted at the end of June showed that approval ratings for the cabinet and the ruling party had again fallen by 5.0 and 4.0%, respectively, from early June.

The election will test the performance of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s minority government and the opposition parties. Key issues include inflation countermeasures—such as consumption tax cuts and cash handouts—and social security reform. A total of 522 candidates are expected to run for 125 contested seats, with the ruling coalition aiming to secure a majority when combined with its 75 non-contested seats. Opposition parties seek to prevent the ruling bloc from winning a majority of the contested seats. The outcome of tariff negotiations with the US, government efforts to lower rice prices, and the results in 32 single-member districts (where vote splitting among opposition candidates could benefit the ruling party) are expected to influence the election

As the ruling LDP has 75 seats that are not up for re-election this time, it can secure a majority with just 50 seats. Assuming that Komeito wins 10 seats and that the LDP wins a record low of 12 seats under the proportional representation system and one seat in each of the 13 multi-seat districts, the number of seats the LDP must win in single-seat districts to avoid losing its majority will be 15 seats. But given that the opposition parties are split among themselves while there are only 32 single-seat districts and the cabinet’s and ruling party’s approval ratings are declining again, at this stage SocGen only sees a 50-50 chance of the ruling party being able to maintain its majority.

There's much more in the full note (see here), but here is SocGen's conclusion on the four most likely scenarios following the Upper House election:

Scenario 1 (50%): the ruling party maintains its majority

  • The ruling party maintains its majority and Prime Minister Ishiba continues in office. In this case, cash payments will be implemented as part of the autumn economic measures, fiscal concerns will subside, and long-term interest rates will remain stable.

Scenario 2 (20%): the ruling party loses its majority and the next PM is Koizumi or Hayashi

  • The ruling party loses its majority and Prime Minister Ishiba resigns. However, the ruling party will continue to form the government with a minority in both houses of the Diet as the opposition parties will refuse to join the coalition government. Either Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Shinjiro Koizumi or Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi are likely to be selected as the next prime minister. In this case, as part of the autumn economic measures, the consumption tax rate on food will be lowered to 5% and the provisional tax rate on gasoline abolished. Meanwhile, long-term interest rates will rise initially, but eventually return to the level of Scenario 1.

Scenario 3 (20%): the ruling party loses its majority and the next PM is Takaichi

  • The ruling party loses a majority, and Prime Minister Ishiba resigns. However, the ruling party will continue to form the government with a minority in both houses of the Diet while the opposition parties will not join the coalition government. Former Minister of Economic Security Takaichi will be selected as the next prime minister. Under this scenario, as part of the autumn economic measures, the consumption tax rate on food will be lowered to 0%, while long-term interest rates will rise from the beginning of the government’s term and remain high. In addition, the view that the BoJ will postpone rate hikes will become stronger, so the yield curve will steepen.

Scenario 4 (10%): a coalition government centred on the opposition parties is formed

  • The ruling party loses its majority, and Prime Minister Ishiba resigns. As a result, a coalition government centred on the opposition parties (opposition parties + ruling party or opposition alliance) will be formed. Under this scenario, as part of the autumn economic measures, the consumption tax rate on food will be lowered to 0% and the provisional tax rate on gasoline abolished, so long-term interest rates will rise significantly from the beginning of the government’s term and remain high.

Bottom line: according to the French bank, there is a 50% chance that the outcome of the Japanese election in two weeks leads to a government crisis, which sends bonds yields in Japan soaring. And since global rates - especially at the long-end - are painfully interconnected in this day and age of soaring budget deficits, a bond market crash in Japan would also immediately result in a bond crisis around the globe.

Finally, what does all this mean for the yen? For one answer, we go to UBS Japan Execution Sales trader Sara Onozato who writes that "USDJPY is showing more signs of stagnation, with limited movement due to a lack of strong buying incentives for the yen and ongoing dollar selling driven by expectations of US interest rate cuts."

As of June 30, the yen was trading around 144, with minimal monthly depreciation compared to more pronounced shifts in April and May. This stagnation is attributed to simultaneous weakness in both currencies. The dollar index has fallen to its lowest level since February 2022, while the yen has also weakened against European currencies, reaching 170 in EURJPY and 182 in CHFJPY.

In the futures market, net short positions in the dollar against major currencies have reached their largest levels in nearly two years. This trend is driven by expectations that the Federal Reserve Borad (FRB) is leaning toward a more dovish stance, favoring interest rate cuts. Market participants have fully priced in two rate cuts in the second half of the year and anticipate further declines in interest rates and a weaker dollar. Speculative net long positions in the yen are still high, limiting further upside.

The outcome of tariff negotiations between Japan and the United States is seen as a key factor, with the July 9 deadline approaching. The US administration has maintained a firm stance on imposing a 25% tariff on Japanese automobiles and criticized Japan for not importing US rice. The BoJ’s Tankan survey released on July 1 showed an unexpected improvement in business sentiment among large manufacturers. If tariff uncertainty clears, the BoJ could raise rates as early as September, potentially pushing the yen to 140 against the US. Conversely, stalled tariff negotiations could lead to further yen depreciation. The House of Councillors election on July 20 adds another layer of political uncertainty, especially after the ruling coalition lost seats in the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly election.

UBS concludes that while most expect USDJPY to remain rangebound between 142 and 146, several key developments could push the pair beyond this range. A move toward 140 could occur if uncertainty around US-Japan auto tariffs is resolved and broader sentiment improves, especially following the BoJ’s recent Tankan survey, which showed an unexpected uptick in business confidence. This, on top of expectations for a BoJ rate hike, could create conditions that support yen strength. In contrast, USDJPY could climb toward 150 if tariff negotiations stall, triggering yen selling—particularly as many companies are expecting a smooth resolution. Political uncertainty from the upcoming House of Councillors election could further weigh on the yen.

Structural factors - such as Japan’s persistent trade deficit and the BoJ’s distance from rate hikes -may also limit yen appreciation, even amid broader dollar weakness. Overall, July could bring renewed volatility, with USDJPY direction hinging on how these economic and political events unfold.

Much more in the Socgen and UBS notes available to pro subs.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 12:11

Unmasking Russia-China Kamikaze Drone Supply Chain In One Map 

Zero Hedge -

Unmasking Russia-China Kamikaze Drone Supply Chain In One Map 

After Russia invaded Ukraine, the Russian firm Aero-HIT emerged as a top drone supplier for Moscow's war effort, relying heavily on overseas partnerships with Chinese companies to bypass Western sanctions to ramp up production of kamikaze drones. 

Internal documents obtained by Bloomberg reveal how Aero-HIT—backed by the Russian government and supported by Chinese entities like Autel Robotics—worked to manufacture thousands of FPV (First Person View) drones, such as the Veles, which have been deployed in Ukraine's Kherson region. Aero-HIT plans to scale production to 10,000 drones per month later this year.

"Taken together, the documents show how sensitive technologies can move from China to Russia even if President Xi Jinping's government says it's not supplying either side," Bloomberg journalist Alberto Nardelli wrote in the report. 

To grasp how radically FPV drones have transformed modern warfare, consider the recent remarks by Erik Prince, founder and former CEO of military contractor Blackwater.

Speaking at a Hillsdale College seminar titled "AI and the Future Battlefield," Prince highlighted how "citizen innovation" in weaponized FPVs has rendered traditional snipers nearly obsolete, extending the reach of battlefield lethality far beyond anything previously imaginable, from just 1,000 yards with a sniper scope to now miles. 

FPV drones can cost anywhere from several hundred to several thousand dollars, depending on their configuration. Bloomberg noted that one order of 100 Veles models was priced at around $1,000 per drone, according to a purchase order from March.

Here are the key points from the report: 

  • Aero-HIT launched in late 2022 with state support and aims to produce up to 10,000 drones per month, scaling to even more advanced models.

  • Despite Chinese company Autel Robotics officially denying any business with Russia, documents show cooperation on technology transfer, firmware, and production of the Autel EVO Max 4T.

  • A $90 million proposal outlines plans to localize Chinese drone tech in Russia, integrating it with domestic systems and producing up to 30,000 units annually.

  • The project involved former KGB-linked individuals, shell companies, and obscure intermediaries in agriculture, seafood, and airline catering to hide the supply chain.

  • As China imposed tighter drone export controls in late 2023, some Chinese firms pulled out, but others—like Shenzhen Huasheng Industry, which was later sanctioned—stepped in.

  • Russia's Ministry of Defense coordinated with Aero-HIT, ordering thousands of drones and integrating them into the military supply chain via sanctioned intermediaries like Renovatsio-Invest and Aeromar-DV.

Our supply chain risk analysis of Aero-HIT aligns closely with the conclusions in Bloomberg's report. Aero-HIT has commercial ties to Shenzhen Huasheng Industry, which in turn is connected to Autel Robotics. The commercial intelligence and data analytics platform we used, Sayari, then maps out Autel's broader network of suppliers. 

 

Bloomberg's report exposes how Russia has exploited private and semi-private Chinese firms—despite Beijing's claims of neutrality—to build a domestic drone industrial base for its war in Ukraine. We've taken it a step further, illustrating for readers exactly how this dark supply chain operates. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 12:05

Los Angeles Mayor Confronts Federal Immigration Officers At MacArthur Park

Zero Hedge -

Los Angeles Mayor Confronts Federal Immigration Officers At MacArthur Park

Authored by Jill McLaughlin via The Epoch Times,

After weeks of decrying federal immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass confronted Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers on July 7 as they gathered at a city park.

Some 100 ICE agents gathered just before 11 a.m. near MacArthur Park in the Westlake area, about two miles west of City Hall. The officers were in vans and some armored vehicles on the outskirts of the park.

The federal agents were wearing vests, and about a dozen Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers were riding horses into the park. They appeared to be staging for deportation activities.

The gathering gained media attention, spurring local activists and protesters to converge on the park.

MacArthur Park is in an area that is home to longstanding criminal street gangs, many affiliated with the Mexican cartels. The park has seen gang shootings, rampant drug use, discarded syringes, homelessness, and people with mental health issues.

Bass, who has repeatedly called for an end to immigration operations in the city, was captured on video arriving at the park before noon surrounded by security officers and walking up to federal officers. Several journalists yelled questions at the mayor as she tried to speak with officers.

One Border Patrol officer called a supervising officer before handing Bass his cellphone.

Bass was seen on news video speaking on the cellphone, saying: “You’re getting ready to leave? OK. Please, can you leave ASAP? What is the issue?”

The Border Patrol agent asked for his phone back from the mayor, telling her he was leaving.

Bass told journalists at the park that the federal law enforcement presence was “unacceptable.”

“They need to leave, and they need to leave right now,” she told reporters.

The agents left apparently without making arrests.

According to Fox News, the CBP official Bass spoke with was Chief Gregory Bovino of the agency’s El Centro Sector. Bovino told Fox News, “I don’t work for Karen Bass. Better get used to us now, cause this is going to be normal very soon. We will go anywhere, anytime we want in Los Angeles.”

People watch Customs and Border Protection agents ride an armored vehicle along Wilshire Boulevard near MacArthur Park in Los Angeles on July 7, 2025. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

The mayor, a former community activist and congresswoman, held a press conference with local groups to address the federal immigration operation.

“What happened in MacArthur Park is outrageous and un-American,” Bass posted on social media. “These raids must end.”

Bass was on her way to join a press conference east of Los Angeles in Pasadena with Gov. Gavin Newsom to mark the six-month anniversary of the destructive Palisades and Eaton fires.

Federal agents ride in multiple armored vehicles down Wilshire Boulevard near MacArthur Park in Los Angeles on July 7, 2025. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

While en route to the press conference, Bass said, she was alerted that there was an ICE operation at MacArthur Park.

“I turned around, we went to the park,” Bass said.

“To me, this is another example of the [Trump] administration ratcheting up chaos and deploying what looked like a military operation in an American City.”

Bass accused the operation of being a “political agenda provoking fear and terror.”

A children’s summer camp was being held at the park when federal officers arrived, according to the mayor.

“It’s outrageous and un-American that we have federal armed vehicles in our parks when nothing is going on in the parks,” she said.

“What I saw in the park today looked like a city under siege, under armed occupation. … The administration is continuing what I have framed as an all-out assault.”

Local activists and protesters have continued demonstrations throughout the region as immigration agents remained focused on the sanctuary city and state.

ICE officials did not immediately return a request for comment about the incident.

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 11:45

"No Extensions" - Trump Strikes Back Against TACO Talk With Aug. 1 Tariff Deadline

Zero Hedge -

"No Extensions" - Trump Strikes Back Against TACO Talk With Aug. 1 Tariff Deadline

President Trump's social media team fired off a barrage of trade warning letters on Monday, including ones sent to Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Laos, Myanmar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Tunisia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Serbia, Cambodia, and Thailand. Each letter explained the new tariff rates—ranging from 25% to 40%—on goods exported from the respective country to the U.S.

The president announced on Tuesday via his social media platform, Truth Social, that more tariff warning letters will be sent out today, and that no further trade extensions will be granted. The hard deadline remains August 1—meaning countries that have yet to strike a deal with the Trump administration will soon begin paying levies on their products entering U.S. ports.

"As per letters sent to various countries yesterday, in addition to letters that will be sent today, tomorrow, and for the next short period of time, TARIFFS WILL START BEING PAID ON AUGUST 1, 2025," Trump wrote on Truth Social at 10:45 ET. 

He continued, "There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change. In other words, all money will be due and payable starting AUGUST 1, 2025 – No extensions will be granted. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" 

An overview of the letters issued thus far (as of Monday evening):

  • U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to impose higher tariff rates of 25%-40% on key trading partners and signed an executive order holding off the new duties until August 1.

  • Tariffs on Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan and Tunisia, would be 25%, South Africa and Bosnia 30%, Indonesia 32%, Bangladesh and Serbia 35%, Thailand and Cambodia 36%, while Laos and Myanmar would face a 40% levy.

  • Meanwhile, Trump suggested the possibility of additional trade negotiations and delays at the White House shortly after he sent out the tariff letters, as he said the notifications were "not 100% firm". He also said the U.S. is close in making a deal with India.

  • White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said additional letters will arrive in the coming days.

Main takeaways:

  1. The deadline was pushed towards August 1 vs. July 9;

  2. Announced new tariff levels (effective on August 1) for 14 countries

  3. Trump said that the tariffs on each country would be separate from any "sectoral" tariffs that he imposes;

  4. We should expect more deals/letters coming: Leavitt said Trump will send more letters 

Goldman's take on the effects of implemented, expected, and/or proposed tariffs on the U.S. effective tariff rate...

The U.S. Dollar and UST10Y have been tracking higher since the European market opened...

*Developing... 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 11:15

1st Look at Local Housing Markets in June

Calculated Risk -

Today, in the Calculated Risk Real Estate Newsletter: 1st Look at Local Housing Markets in June

A brief excerpt:
Tracking local data gives an early look at what happened the previous month and also reveals regional differences in both sales and inventory.

Closed sales in June were mostly for contracts signed in April and May, and mortgage rates, according to the Freddie Mac PMMS, averaged 6.73% in April and 6.82% in May (slightly higher than for closed sales in May).
...
Closed Existing Home SalesIn June, sales in these early reporting markets were up 0.9% YoY. Last month, in May, these same markets were down 5.7% year-over-year Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA).

Important: There were more working days in June 2025 (20) as in June 2024 (19). So, the year-over-year change in the headline SA data will be lower than for the NSA data.
...
This was just several early reporting markets. Many more local markets to come!
There is much more in the article.

Obama Judge Blocks Defunding Of Planned Parenthood In Trump's 'Big Bill'

Zero Hedge -

Obama Judge Blocks Defunding Of Planned Parenthood In Trump's 'Big Bill'

Authored by Matt Margolis via PJMedia.com,

It’s almost impossible to overstate the sheer audacity of what’s just happened in Massachusetts. In a move that defies both logic and the very foundation of our constitutional order, an Obama-appointed judge has swooped in to protect Planned Parenthood from the will of the American people as expressed through their elected representatives. 

Judge Indira Talwani, sitting on the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, decided that Congress—yes, Congress—doesn’t actually get to decide how taxpayer money is spent, at least not when it comes to the Left’s sacred cow.

Let’s be clear: This wasn’t a rogue executive order or some bureaucratic sleight of hand. Congress passed a law. The people’s representatives, accountable to voters, made a decision to defund Planned Parenthood as part of the One Big, Beautiful Bill. That’s how our system is supposed to work. If you don’t like it, you organize, you vote, you persuade your fellow citizens and change the law. That’s democracy. But apparently, that’s not good enough for the activist bench.

Instead, Judge Talwani issued a temporary restraining order, telling the executive branch not to enforce the law. Not because the law was found unconstitutional or even legally questionable—no, the judge didn’t bother to offer any real legal reasoning at all. 

The ruling simply halted the will of Congress in its tracks, leaving Americans and even seasoned legal professionals scratching their heads. How does a judge order the executive branch to ignore a duly-enacted statute without first declaring that statute invalid? On what grounds? 

This isn’t just a technicality. It’s a direct assault on the separation of powers and the legitimacy of our system. If judges can simply override Congress whenever they don’t like the outcome, what’s the point of elections? Why bother sending representatives to Washington if their decisions can be nullified on a whim by an unelected judge with a political axe to grind?

Even those who despise Donald Trump and support abortion rights should be outraged. Every time a judge pulls a stunt like this, it chips away at the credibility of the courts and the very idea of self-government. If the courts can simply invent new rights for their political allies while ignoring the plain text of the law, we’re not living in a constitutional republic anymore—we’re living under the rule of lawyers.

“These radical leftwing Democrat rogue judges will not stop as they burn through the Constitution and defy the Supreme Court,” Mark Levin said, reacting to the news on X. “This Obama fraud has blocked the defunding of Planned Parenthood in the budget bill just passed by Congress and signed by the President. Under what authority does this judge, whose very job was created by Congress and whose jurisdiction was granted by Congress, have the power to do this? NONE!”

The judiciary was never meant to be a tool of the Left, weaponized to override the will of the people. If courts can no longer be trusted to uphold the Constitution over ideology, then it’s time to consider serious consequences—up to and including impeachment. The American people deserve better, and the stakes are too high to let this stand. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 07/08/2025 - 10:40

Pages