Individual Economists

Transcript: Shelia Bair, former FDIC Chair

The Big Picture -

 

 

The transcript from this week’s, MiB: Shelia Bair, former FDIC Chair, is below.

You can stream and download our full conversation, including any podcast extras, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube (video), YouTube (audio), and Bloomberg. All of our earlier podcasts on your favorite pod hosts can be found here.

 

~~~

 

Masters in Business — Sheila Bair

Hosted by Barry Ritholtz · Bloomberg Radio · May 15, 2026

00:00:02  Announcer: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in business with Barry Riol on Bloomberg Radio

00:00:16  Barry Ritholtz: This week on the podcast, another Extra, extra special guest, Sheila Bear, former FDIC, chairperson author. What a fascinating career. She was right in the thick of it through the financial crisis, butting Heads with Tim Geithner and, and working with Hank Paulson. She really has done more than just about anyone in the country to help shore up the financial system, the banking system, and to drive us all towards a better degree of financial education through her work, not only at the FDIC, but at Treasury and through all the books she’s written for children and young adults about finance.

00:01:02  I, I thought this was fascinating, and I think you will also, with no further ado, my conversation with Sheila Bear.

00:01:11  Sheila Bair: Thank you for having me.

00:01:12  Barry Ritholtz: So I want to start with a little bit of background from you. You get a bachelor’s in philosophy from the University of Kansas and then go to law school at the same school, university of Kansas, right. Where you got a jd. Yeah.

00:01:28  What was the career plan? Were you, did you want to be a lawyer or what were you thinking?

00:01:31  Sheila Bair: Well, I’m a native Kansan, grew up in southeast Kansas. Traditional Kansas Republican family, the whole, we were all J Hawks and dad went to medical school. KU mom went to nursing school. My sister was a physical therapist.

00:01:44  I was a, I didn’t choose a medical profession, but did choose ku. So it’s a good school. It was an affordable school, and I really didn’t know what I wanted to do. I was interested in philosophy.

00:01:55  I took a lot of courses in English and economics too, but majored in philosophy and realized pretty much as soon as I graduated, I wasn’t gonna get a very good job with that degree. So, well, you

00:02:07  Barry Ritholtz: Could always teach philosophy.

00:02:08  Sheila Bair: I could do that, but I would have to get a PhD in and probably go to school longer than I wanted to do, do that. So I decided to go to law school, which was a, you know, philosophy is a good major if you’re gonna go into law school, because both disciplines are about logical thinking analysis, you know, good writing skills. And so actually the philosophy major was, was good preparation for law school.

00:02:30  Barry Ritholtz: Yeah, yeah. Say, say the very least. So, so your career spans from government and academia and finance really at the highest levels across all three. Yeah.

00:02:42  What’s the through line? Connecting, connecting each of these worlds? Yeah. Government regulation, academia, and finance.

00:02:51  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, I have been, I’ve had a, I’ve done a lot of different things in my career and I, young people, I tell them, don’t try to pre-program your career career and don’t mean narrow minded about opportunities. And a lot of people stay in the same job for 30, 40, 50 years. I respect that.

00:03:05  That’s fine. That was never for me. I’m always looking for new things. But I guess my, my first entree to the big leagues released, adjacent to the big leagues, was when I worked for Bob Dahl as his council first in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where I actually, I staffed him on the Voting Rights Act, compromise to Title two, the Voting Rights Act, which is pretty much just eviscerated by the Supreme Court, which was, which was very, you know, that was my first big project for him.

00:03:31  So that, that’s, that hurts. But anyway, so I, and then I went with, to the leaders when became majority leader, I went to the Majority Leader’s office with them and handled a broader range of issues. But that’s, that’s really, and then I was on his 88 presidential campaign, actually, which obviously started in 1987. Those campaigns start a good year before the primaries began, and that’s where I started off as a civil rights lawyer and did civil rights issues and other things for him.

00:03:59  But we had the 1987 market crash in, during that time we were, I was working for his presidential campaign became a big issue. I had to take a crash course and stock markets. And that’s when I was first exposed to finance and found that I was really interested in it.

00:04:13  Barry Ritholtz: Huh. Really interesting. Is it, and I wanna focus on, on some of your writing, because you are, you’ve written for very different age groups, demographics, right? So, bull by the horns, obviously for adults about the G ffc.

00:04:28  But the Money Tales book series is aimed at kids, right? And then the new book is really aimed at, at teenagers, people starting out, right? How different is it communicating? Yeah.

00:04:45  Somewhat complex ideas to each, or is it the same? Is it just making it understandable or is it a different approach for each group?

00:04:51  Sheila Bair: It’s, no, it, it’s a bit of a different approach. I think, you know, that the fact that I didn’t really start in findings, that I segued into it working for the stock exchange than later many other senior level jobs. I had to start from scratch when I was learning it, and I had to learn it fast. And so, but I think my own experience helped me really break down and understand and understand how to approach understanding finance.

00:05:16  And one of the big issues is the terminology, the jargon that we use in, in the financial industry. And that can be very confusing and intimidating. And I think sometimes weaponized, frankly, by people who are trying to sell a product or service. So, but yeah, I mean, I think my early need to really start from scratch and learn, it helped me later break down and explain things.

00:05:37  And then I think also my philosophy major, the, the logical thinking, you know, breaking things down into their component parts, understanding the causal connections, kinda laying it out, the analysis out for people in an understandable way is something that I’ve always tried hard to do and have refined over the years. So, but yeah, the, my, you know, bull by the horns was definitely, it was written for a general population, but it talks a lot about securitization and, and topics that make, might make some people’s eyes glaze over. But for industry professionals, I think it was of interest. But my children’s books, and actually I, I wrote another book for teens called Bullies of Wall Street, which was a book about the, the financial crisis for teenagers.

00:06:20  And then I have, golly, since 2006, I’ve been on, you know, as a sideline writing picture books for children. And that those are really fun. ’cause those are fictionalized stories. I use rhyming verses.

00:06:32  They’re just fun. You can be creative. ’cause they’re really about basic concepts, you know, compounding interest risk, capital formation. Those are things that really you can’t explain at a very ba basic level for kids.

00:06:46  Ponzi schemes is one of ’em. Asset bubbles is one, I, I wrote one, it’s called Daisy Bubble. It’s kind of riff on the Tula bubble that occurred in Hollywood hundreds of years ago. And I, I was concerned that kids were not gonna get this.

00:06:59  And that’s one of my more popular books, especially with the boys. There’s a character named Sly Seal that’s manipulating the daisy market. And, and, you know, I make that very transparent in the book. And they, they enjoy that.

00:07:10  Barry Ritholtz: That’s very, that’s very funny. My, my favorite part of Bull by the Horns is just the really vivid detail you go into in with the clashes with Tim Geman. Oh, yeah. And Hank Paulson, if you could go back in time and magically change any decision that was made during the GFC, what, what was the wrong decision and how would you fix it?

00:07:38  Sheila Bair: You mean during the crisis or in the lead up to the

00:07:39  Barry Ritholtz: Crisis? Either or. What, what do you think, what do you think the big is? Excuse me.

00:07:45  It’s never one thing, but if, if, so let, let’s, since I mentioned Guyer Paulson, what of their decisions do you think was most problematic that you would’ve liked to reverse?

00:07:57  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, I think there should have been more accountability. I, I do think there should have been more accountability, I

00:08:02  Barry Ritholtz: Think, meaning Bankers Wall Street, that helped create

00:08:05  Sheila Bair: The crisis. Yes. We should have let at least provided more financial penalties, even if we weren’t gonna send people to jail. I think the bailouts could have been less generous.

00:08:14  I am still outraged that we let them pay bonuses at the end of 2009. So I think that was, you know, after giving ’em all this capital and then once they, you know, got the benefit of all these other programs and, you know, re stabilize themselves to enable ’em to pay that capital back so they could pay bonuses at the end of 2009 when the rest of the country was reeling in a recession. No, I think we could have been a lot tougher. So, but, you know, these things are all compromises.

00:08:40  And actually it was more with Tim Geer than Hank Pauls. And Hank and I could usually come to a common ground, and we did on issues where we started with different, different viewpoints. But yeah, I mean, I think there is a perception of some that they were kind of, the Wall Street was the center of the universe and the heartthrob of the economy, and we needed to take gender living care with it and all of that. And we need to do something.

00:09:04  I’m not suggesting we shouldn’t have provided some stabilization measures, but we didn’t have to. I think we really went overboard. And, and I do regret that, and I think people are still mad about it. I think a lot of the polarization that we have today stems from the, the perception on Main Street that not only did we bail these guys out, but we bailed them out very generously.

00:09:21  Barry Ritholtz: I, I, I couldn’t agree more. Let, let me shock listeners by saying, I think President Trump got something right, almost accidentally by taking a piece of a company like Intel. My, my big complaint during the bailouts were, Hey, if you’re gonna give these publicly traded companies a bailout and not send them to bankruptcy court, well great. Take 40% of the company Yeah.

00:09:49  And promise to sell it back to the public markets within a decade. Right. And it would’ve cut the cost of bailouts substantially and would’ve hurt existing shareholders and management who made a Yeah. Who helped create the whole disaster.

00:10:06  That’s

00:10:07  Sheila Bair: Exactly right. Yeah. No, I think that was, there was, we did a little bit of that, but not enough, because I think there was just a visceral reaction against being too tough. So

00:10:18  Barry Ritholtz: When the alternative is that those, that Hansen building down town with the tall columns and the judge who basically says, okay, you’re now in receivership. Yeah, yeah. Like, when you look at

00:10:30  Sheila Bair: The next,

00:10:31  Barry Ritholtz: I know the next best alternative is your toast. Oh, okay, we’ll give up 40% at a substantial Exactly. Discount and stay live to fight another day.

00:10:39  Sheila Bair: I, I couldn’t agree more. We were, they were looking, their baseline was what, you know, how these companies that operated before they got into trouble. And my baseline was, you know, bankruptcy was the alternative. We did, but it was uneven too.

00:10:51  So we put Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship. Right. And maybe they should have been put in bankruptcy too, but they were the, the, the statute provided for conservatorship where they still, you know, language still. So they, they got punished pretty well, and they didn’t, you know, we were still getting, well now they’re, they’re allowed to keep their capital, to build a capital base.

00:11:08  But the government’s made quite a bit of money since then from that a IG poor a IG, you know, they were, it’s my, they were effectively put conservatorship by the Fed and, and finally emerged from that. But, you know, there was an unevenness too with the way some of those entities were treated versus, for instance, a Citi group, which Right. You know, what else can we do to help you Citi group? I was, it was

00:11:30  Barry Ritholtz: For the third time. Fourth time. Yeah. Third times.

00:11:32  Yeah. Yeah. They’re like every generation, they’re back. They’re back with their hat in hands.

00:11:36  And they, again, we need a few billion. Right.

00:11:40  Sheila Bair: I’m, I’m, I’m rooting for, but you know, historically you knows that he is gonna be back.

00:11:44  Barry Ritholtz: So, so I, I’m kind of fascinated by, over the course of your car career, you have spanned three distinct cycles of deregulation. Right. So we had Graham Leach Bliley. Right.

00:12:00  Which certainly was a major factor, right. That led to the GFC. Yes. It was, we have the entire Dodd-Frank deregulation of, of the decade, the past decade, and then everything that’s Yeah.

00:12:19  Like all the carve outs and, and then most recently Yeah. Reducing the amount of net cap in reserve that Yeah. Banks have to hold that.

00:12:27  Sheila Bair: Yeah. That’s, that’s ongoing.

00:12:30  Barry Ritholtz: So, so why do we keep having these crises? Yeah. Is it structural? Is it the American political system?

00:12:35  Yeah. It seems like we’re constantly repeating these cycles over and over.

00:12:38  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Yeah. Well, we are, and deregulation was a big part of the crisis. Nobody wants to say that.

00:12:44  Or just lack of regulation. The Fed and Bernanke and Greensman of both said this. The Fed had the authority to write lending standards, mortgage lending standards for the entire industry. Problem is, most of these mortgages are being originated by non-banks.

00:12:57  Right. The banks were funding it. Right. But they were providing the, the conduit funding to get ’em obs securitizations.

00:13:02  But the Fed had the power to, to stop that and just flat out fu Oh, we don’t wanna constrain credit. If I hear that once, I think those are, you know, Warren Buffet once said the most dangerous wor words in, in finance. Everybody else is doing it. I think it’s, we’re gonna expand access to credit.

00:13:16  I swear to God, because it is used as an excuse for so many terrible, terrible, did decisions.

00:13:21  Barry Ritholtz: Didn’t Greenspan say, we don’t wanna stifle innovation in the finance markets.

00:13:26  Sheila Bair: Well, that’s, those are the interest words too, right. I don’t wanna stifle innovation either, but it’s just used as an excuse. Oh. You know, like we got, we gotta reduce capital to get more lending out there.

00:13:36  Right. When I think, I would argue there’s too much lending out there already. We’re seeing all the cockroaches screwing out now. So, so yeah.

00:13:42  So it was, and derivatives that you said, Graham Leach Bly, they broke down the, it created these two big to fail institutions. It all got bailed out, but also derivatives, their basically decision was that nobody needs to regulate derivatives markets. The, the theory was, well, the big banks were dealers, the derivatives dealers, they’re regulated by the bank regulators. So we don’t need market regulation.

00:14:01  And that did not turn out so well because the thing about the mortgage crisis was there were hundreds of billions of, of, of mortgages going bad. But there were trillions and trillions of financial engineering on top of how those mortgages would, would perform. And that’s really what got us at the end of the day. Yeah.

00:14:20  There were a lot of mortgages that never should have been made, but the system could have absorbed those underlying losses. It was, it was the derivatives on top of that that really brought things down suddenly.

00:14:30  Barry Ritholtz: So, so let’s talk a little bit about finance. The world has really gotten kind of interesting in terms of, we’re still seem to be dealing with the echoes of the financial crisis. Yeah. We’re, yeah.

00:14:48  It’s amazing. It’s almost 20 years ago. And yet things like when SVB, Silicon Valley Bank and, and Signature Bank failed in 2003, people started to get concerned about systemic risk, even though these are kind of two minor, that was not,

00:15:05  Sheila Bair: Those are not systemic. It was

00:15:07  Barry Ritholtz: Reaction Yeah. Systemically important they to financial institutions. Yeah. They, and yet, in order to cover uninsured depositors Yeah.

00:15:16  Regulators,

00:15:17  Sheila Bair: Who are the richest people? Some among the richest people in the country.

00:15:20  Barry Ritholtz: Gee, I wonder if there’s, I wonder if that’s just a total coincidence or if some upset people made some phone calls.

00:15:27  Sheila Bair: Yeah, I, I was appalled

00:15:28  Barry Ritholtz: Because if your local credit union Yeah. Goes out Yeah. And it’s, and you’re

00:15:33  Sheila Bair: Yeah. You’re, you’re taking a loss if you’re an uninsured deposit or a community bank. Yeah, you bet.

00:15:37  Barry Ritholtz: But if you’re a Silicon Valley VC and you’re connected, you, you get

00:15:41  Sheila Bair: Stable coin issuer. Yeah. It’s like somebody, the Biden administration was doing everything they could to kill crypto on one hand, and then they bail out. One of the biggest, they the biggest stable coin issuers who had, what, a couple, two and a half billion or so of uninsured deposits.

00:15:57  You’re really irresponsible on their part to put that much of their reserves in uninsured deposits. But they were bailed out. I couldn’t believe it. I wrote a very strong piece in the Financial Times after it happened.

00:16:07  I th you know, it was just this knee jerk bailout, bailout, bailout. Right. Especially if they’re rich, powerful people. I don’t, I was just, I was appalled.

00:16:15  I’m still appalled. I was, it was, it was 200 billion. It was not systemic. It had good assets.

00:16:20  If they had, they should have tried to find a, a buyer quickly

00:16:23  Barry Ritholtz: And like Washington Mutual.

00:16:25  Sheila Bair: Yeah. So, but there was, I think nobody said this, but my suspicion is there is outta this Biden administration religious adversity to, to, you know, bank mergers and acquisitions. Oh, look, we can’t make banks bigger. So instead of quickly trying to market and sell it, they didn’t do that.

00:16:42  And, but if, even if they hadn’t, if they just put it into a bridge bank, they had good assets, they probably could have paid 85 90 cents on the dollar to Didn’t

00:16:51  Barry Ritholtz: Someone else come along, buy all the assets anyway. Yeah. Well, yeah. Yeah.

00:16:55  So the merger happened regardless,

00:16:57  Sheila Bair: But, but it cost, the FDAC was 17, $18 billion the deposit insurance fund. It was, it was outrageous. I’m, I’m still aghast that that even happened. And that, you know, and you know, that annoys me with my Democrat friends who pretend that the Republicans are the ones that are pro industry and pro bail out, and then they do something like that.

00:17:17  So, go figure.

00:17:18  Barry Ritholtz: Coming up, we continue our conversation with Sheila Bear, former chairperson of the FDIC, discussing regulation and deregulation in the modern financial system. I’m Barry Ritholtz. You are listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I am Barry Ritholtz.

00:17:50  You are listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest today is Sheila Bear. She’s the former chair of the FDIC, which she helped steer through the financial crisis, her latest book, how Not to Lose a Million Dollars, aimed at Teenagers and helping them really understand the basics of finance. So let’s talk about something else that’s a potential issue.

00:18:15  Private credit has exploded in the past decade. It’s now over $2 trillion. And while we have all of these private, non-bank credit funds, they’re all being funded by regulated banks. Yeah.

00:18:29  Banks. Yeah. Is this just regulatory arbitrage? Yeah.

00:18:33  Sheila Bair: Well, it is in a not, but not in the way that I think the banks soundbites make it sound. So there’s, their soundbite is, is that the capital regulations are too onerous, much tougher than they are for these private funds, which is, the private funds are much less levered than banks. Right. Banks are, you know, on a, on a non-risk weighted basis, you know, bank, these big banks are operating with six 8% capital funding.

00:18:58  Right. It’s equity fund funding. So it’s not, it’s not like they’re, they have tougher capital requirements. The problem is these risk-based rules, and this is exactly what was going on in subprime two, the risk-based rules through the magic of securitization structures and quote unquote overcollateralization, you can lend to a private fund.

00:19:18  And the private fund will give you collateral. They’ll give you their loans and they’ll say they’ll be valued 150% of, of what your loan is. Right. So that you’re way over collateralized.

00:19:28  And if you do it that way, the capital rules will give you a very favorable capital treatments. You can use a lot of leverage increasing your return on equity with that by lending to the fund. If you make the loan directly to the highly levered business who the fund is lending to, you’ve got a very, very high capital charge. And so the argument is, well, you’re directly exposed to this highly levered business, so you know, you need to have it tougher than if you just lend the fund.

00:19:56  That problem is that you’re basically allowing banks to lend and fund indirectly, highly risky mortgages that they would not do or not be permitted to do, frankly, if they were doing it directly. And that’s exactly what was going on with subprime. These horrible unaffordable mortgages pedal to a lot of people who didn’t understand what they were getting. The banks were funding that through their, their were credit lines and their warehouse funding to, you know, provide the, provide the money to the originators packing about securitization and selling them.

00:20:29  And, and again, the capital refer required for that was much, much less than, than actually making a mortgage yourself and holding it. So it, it really is the same basic flaw in how the risk-based capital rules work. I would just say you can’t fund a mor a loan directly or indirectly that doesn’t meet prudent underwriting standards. ’cause what happens is the banks, from a societal standpoint, the banks are funding a lot of really risky loans that if they go bad, can have broader, bad adverse ramifications for the economy.

00:21:02  But they don’t look at it that way. And in point of fact, there are pending capital rules now that will make it even more favorable for these banks to be lending to these intermediary funds as opposed to lending directly. So that’s what’s driving this, not because banks have much tougher capital rules than, than private funds. That is not true.

00:21:20  It’s just that it’s, they can use more leverage to lend the fund directly than to lend the business

00:21:25  Barry Ritholtz: Itself. Here’s what the banks say, and I don’t necessarily believe this, but it, it, it’s not completely un unconscionable. They say when we were securitizing loans during the financial crisis, lending standards had been completely abdicated in all of these. No income check, no job check, just, yeah.

00:21:50  You know? Yeah, that’s true. Sign and pray. And then, oh, it’ll all come out in the, in the collateralization and the syndication.

00:21:57  Right. We’ll spread the risk around. Right. This is, hey, these are, we’re lending money to firms that have been in operation for 10, 20 years and names like Apollo and Carlisle and Blackstone who are trying to get a return on investment.

00:22:14  And this sounds a little familiar, you know, they would never put their reputations or their names at risk by doing anything too stupid. And besides the, the default rates have been really low and it’s highly spread out across sectors and geographies. Is that a fair argument or It,

00:22:33  Sheila Bair: It is a fair argument. And I’m not saying private credit is legitimate asset class. I I don’t, and I don’t think it’s systemic, primarily because you don’t have all this financial engineering sitting on top of it. I do think they’ve been making some really risky loans.

00:22:46  There are a lot of conflicts of interest involved since a lot of the private credit funds are affiliated with the private equity funds, they’re lending to the private equity portfolio companies. And this is a particular problem, actually. I, I’m more, I think this is an investor protection issue more than systemic issue. I really do.

00:23:03  And for sophisticated investors, I think private credit is absolutely a legitimate asset class. You know, gotta understand it’s not regulated. You don’t really know what the loans are worth. Right.

00:23:13  So there’s, there’s a big problem with getting a proper valuation on the assets. Not a lot of transparency for retail or even high wealth, high net worth individuals. There’s liquidity issue, right. The business model doesn’t really work unless most of the capital is locked in.

00:23:30  And, and frankly, there’s a re a lot of research questioning whether it really provides better returns. You know, the s and p 500 has been kicking it for, for several years now. Right. So, you know, so there, there are a lot of questions, but for sophisticated investors, you know, go forth and do it.

00:23:44  And it’s, I don’t think it’s systemic, but I do, and I do worry about these life insurance companies and the annuities because the, again, you’ve got private equity owned life insurance affiliate. You’ve got the private credit affiliate, you’ve got the life insurance affiliate lending into the private credit affiliate. You’re using these third party credit raters to make sure, you know, it’s all at arm’s length, but very incestuous. Yeah.

00:24:08  And that the BIS did a study about a year ago on this. And there others have taken a look at these valuations and they’re finding significant evidence of inflated values. So I, I do think we need to protect at the retail level. We need to, there need to be some not expanding access to this.

00:24:25  Barry Ritholtz: So you’re not a fan of private equity or private debt in 4 0 1 Ks? No,

00:24:30  Sheila Bair: I am not. As a matter of fact, I am not. You know what, if you wanna, there’s a pub, you, you wanna buy a stock in KKR, go for it. You know, you might check how it’s been forming.

00:24:38  I an actual, I don’t know how it’s been performing, but I’m just saying there are pub, if you really want exposure, there are, you know, publicly traded away BDCs. Now sure, there are publicly traded BDCs, there are public ways to do it. There are some funds, 40 ACT funds that do invest a small percentage in alternatives too. So there, there are ways now, but yeah, opening it up for, directly for retail, especially 4 0 1 Ks, to, to start, you know, loading up on this, on this asset class, I think is really problematic.

00:25:07  And I do worry that, you know, the, the, the, the plan sponsors, the fund sponsors, the 401k sponsors are gonna be getting the hard sell about, you know, putting this stuff into people’s 4 0 1 Ks. And I, and I, again, I don’t think retail, I know I don’t, I I don’t want exposure to it. I’ve read enough to make me really worried about it. So I think really sophisticated big institutions, which have traditionally been their investor base, they wanna do it fine, but no, it’s not right for retail.

00:25:35  And it, it shouldn’t be going into 4 0 1 Ks and I’m, yeah, I’m very worried about that.

00:25:39  Barry Ritholtz: And, and to put some numbers on what you had referenced about the performance, the median alternative funds doesn’t do all that great. No. Doesn’t, it’s not that diversified. No.

00:25:52  And it doesn’t outperform the s and p 500. Hey, if you’re lucky enough to get into a top decile fund Exactly. You, you’re gonna kill it. But it’s gonna take a couple hundred million dollars

00:26:03  Sheila Bair: Yes, exactly. To have access to that. Yeah. That’s, yeah.

00:26:05  The retail people are not gonna be getting the criminal LA crim on this. No, that’s, and that’s a huge issue. They’re gonna stuff the, the riskier stuff into the 401k.

00:26:13  Barry Ritholtz: It makes a lot of sense. So, so we’ve talked about everything, but too big to fail. Right. Which was a big part of the lead up to the financial crisis and how the fed, the FDIC, everybody dealt with it afterwards.

00:26:30  As an example, JP Morgan Chase now has over 4 trillion with a t Yeah. In assets. Can a bank that size be effectively regulated? Is is too big to fail the norm now?

00:26:44  Sheila Bair: Oh, I think so. It absolutely is. I mean, I, I worked hard in Dodd-Frank to come up with res, you know, to instill more, better authorities to put these large institutions into a resolution type process where you would impose that accountability. You could fire the top management, the boards and impose, you know, make the shareholders and bond holders unsecured creditors absorb the losses.

00:27:07  All the stuff we didn’t do during the crisis.

00:27:09  Barry Ritholtz: You mean normal bankruptcy rules?

00:27:11  Sheila Bair: Yeah, exactly. Yeah. It was, it was similar to the FDIC process, which is basically a bankruptcy process. And, and Title two, and Dodd-Frank, excuse Dodd-Frank provides for both the Title two mechanism, which is FDIC run and a bankruptcy process, a Title one process.

00:27:25  So the tools are there, but I don’t, I don’t think there’s any, I i I, I hate to say this, but I don’t think there’s any chance they’d ever use it. I really don’t. I think they’re gonna bail out again. They already, they already do.

00:27:36  They’ll, they’ll set up special lending facilities or ratchet interest rates down. You know, they’ll, if, if, you know, private equity, so actually I worry more about private equity than private credit because private equity funds are heavily exposed to software companies, which we don’t know how that’s gonna shake out. But there’s a quite a bit of concentration there is. So, you know, so, but if that sector gets into trouble, you know, the Fed will lend to the banks who can then lend the funds.

00:28:01  I mean, that’s, that’s just the way I think it works now. And I think a lot of the push for ev ever more deregulation, lower capital rules, is based on the assumption of the big bank lobbyist that they’re never gonna go down. There’s another kerfuffle, another problem. The fed’s just gonna open up the spigot again.

00:28:18  So, you know, why should they have to operate with all this capital when they can lower their capital and get much higher returns on equity? And I do think that’s, that’s the unspoken rationale, because it doesn’t make any sense otherwise. Because we’ve got a lot of uncertainties in the banking system right now to be lowering capital. Makes no sense.

00:28:37  Unless you’re just banking on a bailout if things get dicey.

00:28:40  Barry Ritholtz: Let, let’s talk about a financial crisis that really has gotten a lot of short shrift, given everything else we just discussed, which is the student debt crisis. Yeah. Yeah. We’ve seen just an explosion of student loans.

00:28:57  It was briefly and defaults, it was briefly put on pause during the pandemic. And right afterwards. I just saw a survey earlier today that said 83% of young people say this is a bad economy when by most historical measures, it’s a booming economy. Yeah.

00:29:18  Yeah. So, so how did we get here? Why is it so difficult to fix? What is a potential policy?

00:29:28  Solution to Yeah. The student debt crisis?

00:29:30  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, and I do, I think the headline numbers are, in this case shaped economy. I think the headline numbers can be, can be misleading. ’cause you gotta look at how, how that wealth is being distributed, of course.

00:29:39  But I think for student debt, I, I will give credit to the Trump administration in Congress. The, the BBB, the big beautiful bill, I hate that name, but it had some really important reforms to the student loan system. So they’ve dramatically simplified the repayment options. There’s now a standard plan and a one income based repayment plan.

00:29:59  They have imposed some accountability on colleges, which desperately needed to be done. And so it’s easy to kick colleges now with high default rates out of the, out of the loan system. They have gotten rid of negative amortizations. One of the, one of the frustrating things about student loan borrowers was that because in previous administrations, the repayment plans that were based on a percentage of your income were set so low that people were even, some of ’em were not, were paying zero because you had to earn a certain amount of money before, you know, a loan payment obligation even kicked in.

00:30:33  But what happened was, then they, for bookkeeping purposes or whatever, they would negatively amortize the loan. So all your unpaid interest was going into your debt principle and it was getting bigger and bigger. Just

00:30:43  Barry Ritholtz: Recapitalized.

00:30:44  Sheila Bair: Yeah, yeah. Forever. So even if you were, if even if you were making some payment, your got frustrated ’cause your debt was getting bigger and bigger. That’s all gone away with.

00:30:52  Now negative amortization has been abolished. Everybody has to pay at least $10 a month. I don’t think that’s unreasonable. If you got a loan from taxpayers, even if you’re struggling, you can pay $10 a month.

00:31:04  And then there’s, and then, so if you, and if that payment is so low, if you income driven payment is so low that you’re not covering your interest, the government will pay $50 a month to lower your principal. So, so long as you’re making at least $10 a month, your principal will go down each month. And I think this will be, it’s simpler and will provide better incentives to keep, make loan payments, keep up the loan payments, you’ll actually be able to see the principal going down. So I give credit, and in full disclosure, my son, who’s a fellow at the a EI was, was also heavily involved in this.

00:31:40  So he’s a chip off the old block though. We think a lot when it comes to student. Yeah. Simplification, more accountability.

00:31:47  And those are the things that this bill accomplished. So I’m, I’m hoping that this gets straightened up and people are having to pay now. But the transition to going from not paying for years, you know, and Trump did that too. We had this, what, three or four year long moratorium people are gonna have to pay now, it’s gonna hurt.

00:32:04  They haven’t made room in their budget for these lump

00:32:06  Barry Ritholtz: Payments. Well, $10 a month isn’t, isn’t,

00:32:08  Sheila Bair: It’s not huge. No, it’s

00:32:09  Barry Ritholtz: Not. Right. And if the government is kicking in 50, yeah. I mean, it’s not a ton of money, but it’s, no, it’s not, it’s not still, what, $600 a year?

00:32:16  Yeah. Yeah. Have we done enough to resolve the student debt crisis or no? What, what else can we do to move this along?

00:32:25  Yeah.

00:32:25  Sheila Bair: Well, I I do think there needs to be more accountability for colleges to assume some belong The schools themselves. Yes. The colleges themselves, because this is, this was, it was the classic misaligned economic incentives. So with the best of intentions, the Congress said, okay, and from now on, all the student loans can be made.

00:32:44  You know, pretty much all of ’em are gonna be made by the government. ’cause we’re worried the banks are not treating borrowers as well as they should. So we’re gonna be doing this. And then the, the colleges themselves will basically originate the loans.

00:32:56  So you apply to a college, and the college financial aid office will come up with a financial aid package, and they will calculate how much you need to borrow to go to their school. Well now what are their incentives? You know, they’re gonna get the money, right. Buying for a tuition room and board.

00:33:10  So they’re, they’re gonna get the money. They’re not on the hook if the student can’t repay the loan. So what do you think is gonna happen? And, and the the what happened exactly is you, you could have predicted it, inflation, you know, with tuition, you know, many multiples, what, you know,

00:33:26  Barry Ritholtz: 9% a year for 40 years, 50

00:33:28  Sheila Bair: Years for, for whatever. Yeah. So it’s crazy. Tuition is, as any parent knows or student knows, this skyrocketed become very unaffordable without borrowing.

00:33:37  And, but, you know, there was all this easy money. And the grad, the undergraduate is problem with the graduate schools. You know, a lot of young people then sold a bill of goods to get a master’s or a PhD because they’re unlike undergraduate loans. There is some caps on your federal loans, but no effective caps.

00:33:52  That’s been changed now too. There are some caps, thank goodness, on your graduate professional schools, you know, so somebody like me, oh, I’m gonna go get a PhD in philosophy so I can teach. Right? So I paid $300,000 to get my PhD in philosophy and get a job maybe paying 60,000 a year, some small college.

00:34:09  Well, that makes sense. But I think that’s happened to a lot of people. And, and I don’t think, you know, I don’t absolve the borrower either. They should have known better.

00:34:20  But the schools let this happen. These, these graduate professional schools can be real money makers. They are, the graduate schools in particular, real money makers for colleges. And the degrees are frequently do not enhance the earnings potential of the student.

00:34:32  Barry Ritholtz: So do you have any hope that students are, are in a better shape financially going forward? Or is this still very problematic and needs

00:34:41  Sheila Bair: More help? I know, I think things are getting better. And a lot of it is something else that Trump, the first Trump administration did, which Biden continues. And the, and the current Trump administration continues, is to publish postgraduate outcomes.

00:34:53  So you can go on college scoreboard now and put in a college and a degree that you may be thinking about it. And you can see what the graduates are actually making. And you can find out the graduation rate, you can find out the retention rate, you can find out all sorts of information that will tell you is that college graduating students and are they getting job good jobs after they leave? And so I think more and more parents and student advisors, high school, college advisors are using those tools are more calculators too, that are based on help you figure out how much you can borrow based on what your postgraduate income will likely be in that field at that college.

00:35:31  So there is more awareness. And then I think a lot of, you know, ironically this is coming back to buy a lot of the colleges now, because I think it got so expensive. People were starting to take a second look, well, do I really need to go to college? You know, for so long there was all this social pressure to go to college.

00:35:47  I was a college president. I’ve taught a university. I think it’s a wonderful experience, but it’s not for everybody. And you don’t have to do it.

00:35:53  And there’s no stigma if you don’t do it. You know, you might wanna go directly into the workforce, learn on the job, you might wanna go to a, a trade school. There are, you know, community colleges, you gotta be careful there too. But many of them provide really good, you know, education that’s less expensive and a shorter duration.

00:36:10  So I think students in their parents are also thinking more broadly that they don’t have to go to college. There may be other options available.

00:36:16  Barry Ritholtz: La last question about college and education. We have thousands and thousands of, of universities and colleges. Do we have too many? Too

00:36:28  Sheila Bair: Many? Yeah,

00:36:29  Barry Ritholtz: Probably do. I mean, are we gonna lose 10 or 20% of the college base over the next decade? Yeah,

00:36:35  Sheila Bair: We probably will. And I think the, the, the, the, the, the, the part of it that’s really, really struggling are the private liberal arts schools. And they, they became too pricey. And I, I think that’s sad because I used to be the president of one of those colleges and I think they do offer very special educational experience.

00:36:54  A very, you know, it’s, it’s, it’s more high touch. It’s more, you know, for some, you know, going to college when you’re 17, 18 years old can be pretty traumatic. You’ve never been away from home, you know, and so, so some students that small intimate college environment was a good option, but they’re really struggling now. And so I think we’ll still have them, but I think there’ll be a lot of consolidation there.

00:37:13  Hmm. And then it’s the weaker schools, you know, if they, they’re not proving their worth, they’re gonna, they’re gonna close probably, huh.

00:37:18  Barry Ritholtz: Yeah. Really, really fascinating. So you went from writing a crisis memoir for adults to totally the opposite direction, basic financial literacy for children. What made you decide to aim in between at yeah.

00:37:35  Young adults and teenagers? Yeah.

00:37:37  Sheila Bair: Well actually it was my editor who, you know, everybody, when I first started running the, the picture books, everybody said, oh, this is too, you know, elementary school children are too young for this. And they’re not, they absolutely. And the books have sold well, and, and they, they totally get it. But my, my publisher, everybody said, you need to write a book for teenagers.

00:37:54  And my publisher thought that was a good idea as well. And so I thought about it and I thought, yeah, because, you know, there’s more and more financial education being required in high schools. And I, I want, I’m concerned that as schools start offering these courses, that there’s, you know, good quality, accurate content. There’s a lot of people out there providing financial, you know, a lot of people on social media, a lot of curricula, you know, sponsored by industry groups.

00:38:19  And so I thought, well, you know, I’m gonna, I’m gonna throw my hat in here to try to provide some basic financial advice to teenagers as they’re entering adulthood. So that’s, that was the, I will have to say my, my publisher’s initiative, but I think it was a good idea and I’m pleased with the way they came book came out.

00:38:35  Barry Ritholtz: So, so I’m glad you brought up social media. Yeah. Gen Z and what’s the new generation after them? Generation Alpha.

00:38:43  Yeah. I, I can’t get someones generation. Jones is another one. I can’t keep up with it.

00:38:48  But they all seem to get a lot of financial advice from Instagram and YouTube. Yeah. And TikTok. Yeah.

00:38:55  Rather than, let’s say, more professional experienced folks. Right. How did that impact how you thought about reaching this age group and, and how did it shape the tone of, of your book? Yeah,

00:39:11  Sheila Bair: So it was, I did wanna get some accurate information out there because there’s, and a a, a big theme of this book is, you know, I say in the introduction, building wealth is not hard. You need to establish a regular saving investing habit. You need to avoid debt. That’s really what you need to do.

00:39:29  And, and, but there’s so much advice that’s just the opposite. And especially on social media, it pushes debt. You know, well, why bother with a nice safe index fund? You can go borrow some money and buy a rental property and make way, you know, way more returns than No, no, no, no.

00:39:45  So, but there’s crazy stuff like that or, or borrowing to invest in crypto or mim stocks or, you know, gambling, you know, and their kids are getting confused about the difference between gambling and investing. They’re very different things. So I wanted to, to provide some correctives to that. And then just basically also address and flag common financial behaviors that cost people money.

00:40:07  Like carrying a credit card balance that I’m very open in my first chapter about my, I totally got in trouble with credit card debt. I was just, just graduated from law school. I was a civil rights lawyer, then. Didn’t know anything about finance, didn’t care, thought it was beneath me.

00:40:22  I needed to, you know, buy some clothes for work. I needed to get a, an apartment and furnish my apartment as I was getting all these solicitations from various credit card issuers who had found out that I was now, you know, working for a living somehow. So yeah, I got in trouble with credit card debt and I made that minimum payment and I thought, wow, this is great. I can borrow this money and it, this tiny little payment every month.

00:40:43  And I ended up, I think it was about $6,000 in interest when all of a sudden done,

00:40:46  Barry Ritholtz: Oh my god, that’s a lot. Well,

00:40:48  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Which if it invest in the s and p 500, it would be worth around 240, 200 $50,000 now. So there you go. So, but I think, you know, just avoiding things like that, the average family pays 1600 a year in credit card interest.

00:41:01  If that was just put into an s and p 500 index fund, boy, you know, over 30 or 40 years, that’s, you’re talking real money, huh. So that was, I I wanted to emphasize that is the simplicity of, of how to build wealth compounding opportunity costs are big themes. Those are, I think those are so fundamental to understanding how to manage money. And, but I basically, I just wanna help kids avoid mistakes.

00:41:23  I don’t want them to have financial problems when they grow up. I want them to get off on a, on the good, on the right foot, which I did not, and a lot of people don’t.

00:41:29  Barry Ritholtz: Coming up, we continue our conversation with Sheila Bear discussing her latest book, how Not to Lose a Million Dollars, A Young Person’s Guide to Avoiding the Tricks and Traps of Our Financial System. I’m Barry Ritholtz, you’re listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I am Barry Ritholtz. You are listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

00:42:12  My extra special guest this week is Sheila Bear. She is the former chair of the FDIC. Her latest book is out How Not to Lose a Million Dollars, A Young Person’s Guide to Avoiding the Tricks and Traps of our Financial System. So, so you mentioned a couple of really interesting things that taken together.

00:42:34  Howard Linson runs a venture fund and he calls it the degenerate economy. Gambling speculation. Yeah, yeah. End of day options.

00:42:43  Mean stocks, crypto coins. Yeah. And all of these have been through, through apps and other Yes. Methods, yes.

00:42:51  Because of the phones have been adopted by teenagers en mass. What do you make of the DGen economy and what does it mean to the future health of, of these young adults? Yeah.

00:43:04  Sheila Bair: Well, it’s very dangerous and it’s particularly a problem with young boys. And oh, by the way, they shouldn’t be doing this if they’re under 18, but a lot of ’em, ours, we know they’re targeted and they, they don’t understand the, the worth of money. The, the apps just make it so easy and don’t, you know, they don’t make the connection between the financial losses they’re experiencing. It’s a game for them.

00:43:24  And, and the industry advertises. They, they do gamify it. So, and even, you know, stock trading, some of these online brokers are big ones. They, they gamify it and it’s not a game.

00:43:34  It’s, it’s serious money. Serious. And I think one of the things from early on, if parents give their children allowances, but tie that to work, I think it’s really important for kids to understand early on the connection between work and money. It’s not just free, easy, you know, ’cause too many kids don’t make that connection and their parents are generous with the credit cards or whatever.

00:43:56  And, and they use their credit card numbers to do all these gaming apps. And, and I just don’t think it, the reality of what these kids are doing actually sinks in until they’re really in over their head. And I think it’s purposeful. I think, you know, kids don’t understand the difference between gambling and investing.

00:44:13  Well, there’s a big difference. And you’re investing, you’re supporting capital formation and the real economy helping businesses who make real goods and real services raise money and operate or supporting the secondary market that enables all of that. And what are you supporting with gambling or crypto? I mean, some crypto to the extent it, it represents the technology, I think crypto technology is, is very valuable.

00:44:36  But these, these, these, you know, these different currencies and tokens that have nothing

00:44:41  Barry Ritholtz: Behind them, you can call ’em shit coins.

00:44:42  Sheila Bair: That’s what they’re, how I call ’em shit coins. ’cause that’s, that’s nothing behind them. I’m amazed that Bitcoin is held up. I think it’s just, you know, it’s kind of the, the granddaddy of ’em all.

00:44:50  So if you’re gonna invest, most people do a Bitcoin ’cause they’ve, they’ve heard about it and the rest of it is crap. But Bitcoin may be too, but it has lasted. I will give it that. But yeah, I mean, what are they supporting?

00:45:02  And they’re losing money. You know, there’s a, there was a study done of gambling apps that showed that the people that use gambling apps, only 5% take out more money than they put in. And it’s addictive in these, these gambling platforms. If these, even if you start winning, well wow.

00:45:18  Oh, you’re doing great. Here’s a little money, why don’t you keep going? You know, they want you to keep going until you start losing money. ’cause the yard are, you will always lose money.

00:45:25  And Bloomberg came out with some great research recently on prediction markets. 75% of the profits, I believe are going to 1%

00:45:32  Barry Ritholtz: Of the users. Less than 1%. Yeah. Less than 1%.

00:45:34  It’s crazy. It’s so less money.

00:45:36  Sheila Bair: The whole game is rigged. Well, even active trading of stocks, very few people can do that and make, make money consistently

00:45:42  Barry Ritholtz: Over time.

00:45:42  Sheila Bair: Yeah. And you’re gonna be going against people who do it for a living, have a lot more access to data and expertise and, you know, algorithms and all the things, all the tools you’ll not have when you try to actively trade

00:45:53  Barry Ritholtz: Stocks. So, so this is kind of fascinating. I bet most people don’t know how much of a passion project this has been for you so long. I’m not, did I read this correctly?

00:46:04  You established the financial education division within the Treasury department early. I did

00:46:08  Sheila Bair: The Office of Financial thousand early education early in 2001. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Well I did, I still, I established the Office of Financial Education and it’s grown now. It’s in the treasurer’s office now.

00:46:17  And I think they held, they held, they held a group, it’s called fl and it’s basically a, a council of all the different financial education components of the various different regulatory agencies. And it’s a good group. Yeah, I did start it. That’s, that’s one of the things that got me interested in I, and actually my first book I was, was pre-crisis, was Rock.

00:46:37  Rock and the Saving Shock. It actually came out in 2006 because based on that experience, it inspired me to start writing kids books. ’cause I became aware that there really weren’t any resources for elementary age schools.

00:46:48  Barry Ritholtz: So, so how not to lose a million dollars covers basics like savings accounts, right. Student loans, debt avoidance. Right. And retirement planning it.

00:46:55  Yep. It kind of raises a question, why aren’t we teaching our kids financial fundamentals at the grade school level? Yeah. Why, why is this not just part of civics and Yeah.

00:47:07  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well it can and should be. I mean, I, I think there’s a big movement now to have a standalone high school personal finance class. But I think is good.

00:47:16  But it really, it needs to be more than that. It needs to be, every year it needs to be introduced. And, you know, math curriculum is an, an obvious place. ’cause I think it makes ma it will make math more interesting to kids if you do use money examples, right?

00:47:29  So you wanna learn about ratios and percentages. Let’s talk about compounding and how much your money grows at four percents a year, whatever. So it, it does need to be introduced every year. And, and again, that’s one of the reasons my books are, I mean there’s supplements to curricula.

00:47:44  I don’t write educational curricula, but there’s certainly could be assigned readings to go with those, those classroom efforts. And I think that’s important and the kids get it. They’re interested in it. They absolutely get it.

00:47:54  They’re not too

00:47:55  Barry Ritholtz: Young. One of my favorite parts of the BBB was the new newborn accounts. Oh,

00:48:03  Sheila Bair: It’s Trump accounts.

00:48:04  Barry Ritholtz: Yeah. The baby bonds, which Corey Booker started talking about, drawing a blank on the name of the venture capitalist who suggested something like this years ago. But it’s only a thousand dollars to every newborn in an investment account. Yeah.

00:48:18  Yeah. I Is this a good start? Is this gonna help kids learn about money? Yeah.

00:48:23  Yeah.

00:48:24  Sheila Bair: It absolutely is. It’s, I think, you know, it’s only for, there’s a three year period where children are born within this three year period we’ll get the thousand dollars. But it, it can be matched by employers. A lot of employers who

00:48:36  Barry Ritholtz: We’re hearing already, Dell and JP Morgan and a bunch of big employers. And they’ll do a a thousand dollars match. Exactly. And the assumption is this’ll be renewed after three years.

00:48:46  Sheila Bair: I, I hope so. I hope it is. I’m, you know, I’m kind of a fiscal conservative when it comes to our deficits, but I think this is a good way to spend the money. ’cause it goes directly, you know where it’s going.

00:48:56  You know, it’s helping. And it is, it’s a wonderful way to learn about the power of compounding. Congress mandated the, the money has to be invested in broad based index funds, which is good. Right.

00:49:06  I, you know, or we’d be seeing crypto and mim so, or whatever, right. So that’s, that’s good. But you can see over time how it’ll grow. And I hope, you know, when they’re 18 they can, they can take it out.

00:49:15  But I hope they leave it there and it just converts into a regular, i a at that point. But it’s, it’s great. It’s a wonderful financial educational tool as well as some additional financial security for low income families and their children.

00:49:27  Barry Ritholtz: So let, let’s talk about another aspect of money that’s so different today than it was when we were kids. Money is effectively invisible. Yeah. Credit cards, apps, buy now, pay later, subscriptions, all that.

00:49:42  There, there have been studies that have shown that if you give people a pile of cash to spend or a credit card loaded with the same amount, they spend more with the credit card than with actually paying, you know, greenbacks, which says a lot about the psychology of, you know, modern spending. It does. Yeah. So, so how do you, how do we recognize that and how do we teach kids the value of a dollar?

00:50:10  It’s, it’s, it’s really a challenge when you, you just tap the card and it’s magic.

00:50:15  Sheila Bair: It’s, it’s not real money. It’s funny money. Yeah. Well that’s what, you know, I think it’s important to attach an allowance to jobs.

00:50:23  I think helping kids make the connection between having to work and earning money is really, really important. ’cause the parents are too generous. They let ’em use their credit card. So that’s, they start getting that easy usage.

00:50:33  And if they’re using their parents’ credit card, they’re not having to, it’s not causing them any pain to spend money. So I think the parents can control a lot of this, but the, the kids need to understand the connection between earning money and spending money. And if they make that connection, they will be more judicious and careful with their money because they realize how dear it is because it took that $10, took an hour of their life, raking leaves or whatever, you know. So I, I think it’s, it’s important to make that connection and financial education understanding.

00:51:03  You know, I have a chapter on, I spend a lot of time on credit cards. ’cause I think it is a, an early trap for a lot of families and a lot of kids because it’s just so easy. And bnm PL is the same thing. B-M-P-L-I don’t like it.

00:51:15  Barry Ritholtz: Buy now, pay later,

00:51:16  Sheila Bair: Buy now, pay later. The whole idea is to facilitate impulse buying. Let’s face it, you know, you’re using BMPL when it’s really beyond your budget to buy. You weren’t thinking about buying it.

00:51:25  You don’t really have the money now to buy it, but you really want it. And that’s what BNPL does. And they’re, you know, BNPL users a, a very high percentage of them. You know, first of all it’s not interest free ’cause it ends up going on your credit card ’cause you can’t pay it off.

00:51:38  So you’re just carrying the balance on your credit card or it’s coming outta your checking account and you overdraft and you get an overdraft fee. So it’s not really, they say it’s interest rate, it’s not for a lot of users’, it’s not really, it gets them in a financial

00:51:50  Barry Ritholtz: Trouble. When we were kids it was called layaway lay. That’s right. And you didn’t get the good or item, I tell you until you paid it off.

00:51:57  And you very much understood. Yeah, I gotta shovel more, more sidewalks or, or mom more lawns Yeah. If I want that bike or whatever it happened to be. Exactly.

00:52:08  Yeah. It, it was, this is the opposite lesson.

00:52:10  Sheila Bair: It is. It, it totally is. And I, you know, so I think it feeds a lot of overspending. I think impulse, I, you know, kids are making decisions and decisions more impulsively.

00:52:21  I mean, they don’t have the same impulse control adults have. And, and I think you know it, people know that, retailers know that. Commercial entities know that. So they, they try to encourage them to make snap decisions to, to buy something.

00:52:35  And it just, it’s so important. I, I have a rule, wait a week when my chapter I’m budgeting about buying things. Just wait a week. You know, there’s some things you have to buy your needs, like your rent or whatever.

00:52:44  Right? But if, if it’s your wants, first of all, don’t buy any want that’s not within your budget. And even if you do wait a week, you know, just don’t buy it on impulse. Wait a week, come back to it.

00:52:54  You really wanna, or not? When I go into grade schools and do readings, I, my common question is, raise your hand if you’ve ever bought something you wish you hadn’t bought. Every hand goes up. Every hand goes up.

00:53:05  Yeah. Every hand goes up. It’s amazing. Yeah.

00:53:07  Already, you know, at seven years old, they, they’ve got buyer’s remorse. It’s usually junkie toys. What,

00:53:11  Barry Ritholtz: What I, speaking of junkie toys, when there’s a car I fixate on. My little hack is I’ll buy one of the die cast models and put it on my shelf. So for 60 bucks, I like, alright. I feel like, all right.

00:53:27  I, I have a little experience in this car. Yeah. And after a few weeks, it’s like, all I have the toy, I’m good. I don’t need to spend a hundred thousand dollars on another stupid thing for the garage.

00:53:38  Well,

00:53:38  Sheila Bair: That’s right. There’s a, there’s, there’s a chapter on buying a car too. I just bought a by a, I just bought a car, actually, a used car. I didn’t wanna, they, they proceed so fast, it’s gonna be second car.

00:53:47  But this, this, I couldn’t believe it. I mean, I knew this, I’ve had experience in the past. It’s been a while since I bought a car. He was trying to upsell me with everything.

00:53:54  And now they’re trying to sell me, give me all these service contracts. So would increase the price of the car by about 25%. It’s just, it’s just unbelievable. They’re, you know, kids wanna buy cars.

00:54:04  They want their own cars. That is such,

00:54:05  Barry Ritholtz: Such erritory. I I don’t think that’s true anymore. Anymore.

00:54:08  Sheila Bair: Maybe not,

00:54:09  Barry Ritholtz: Not a lot. A lot of kids aren’t getting licenses. They can uber wherever on mom’s urban. I think that’s true.

00:54:14  Yeah. Right. And it, it’s, there seem, although there is a renaissance of kids buying, let’s call ’em 20-year-old analog as opposed to digital cars with stick, with stick shifts, really. Like there’s a whole generation of new car enthusiast coming up.

00:54:34  Yeah. That I, I think a stick shift today is an anti-theft device because, you know, nobody knows how to drive. You bring it to a valet, they look at you, you go to a restaurant, they’re like, would you mind pulling it in over there? Yeah.

00:54:46  Okay. Nice.

00:54:47  Sheila Bair: That’s funny. But it’s really true. It, and it’s good because, you know, cars are expensive. The average monthly payments, well, like 700 a month, you know, for a young boy party,

00:54:56  Barry Ritholtz: It’s a thousand dollars a month is not uncommon on a lease. Yeah.

00:55:00  Sheila Bair: Well

00:55:00  Barry Ritholtz: Lease. And kids don’t understand why, Hey, no down payment. Yeah. Well, yeah.

00:55:05  But no, no residual at the end, you have the back. Right. It’s just the cost.

00:55:10  Sheila Bair: It’s exactly right. Yeah. So it, yeah. It’s really expensive for in person to buy a car if they can avoid that.

00:55:15  Barry Ritholtz: So, so I only have you for a few more minutes. Yeah. So let me jump to my favorite questions. I ask all my guests.

00:55:22  Starting with, tell us about your mentors who helped shape this Yeah. Career you’ve enjoyed through academia, finance, and government. Yeah.

00:55:31  Sheila Bair: Well, Bob Dole obviously stands out. He was really, he, he really taught me what public service meant. And he was always focused on the public interest. He was a populist in the good sense.

00:55:42  You know, he was from a small rural town in, in Kansas. He was horribly injured during World War ii. Laid up for years. The townspeople rallied, supported him, got him back to health.

00:55:52  Helped him become who he became. So he was really, he really focused on, on the public. And I learned that. And I think later in my career and at the FDIC, we, we kept that focus on the public, the people who are using the banks, not the banks.

00:56:06  Who are we helping? Were we helping the people who use banks? So I, I’m proud of that. And I learned a lot from him.

00:56:12  You know, later I got to know Paul Volker. I learned a lot from him. I, Paul Paul. Yeah, that’s right.

00:56:19  Elizabeth Dole was someone, I never really had a chance to work with her, but I knew her through, through the Senator Bob and had maintained contact with her over years. Another woman who inspired me, not a mentor, but Senator d O’Connor, the first woman, Supreme Court Justice, when I was on the Judiciary committee, I got to handle her confirmation. And she was just a lovely person. So a lot of people I’ve met over the years, but Dole really stands out as, as my, my prime supporter and, and mentor in my career.

00:56:48  Hmm. Yeah.

00:56:49  Barry Ritholtz: Let, let’s talk about books. What are you reading now? What are some of your favorites? Yeah,

00:56:53  Sheila Bair: So I love murder mysteries. I’m reading Anthony Horowitz’s new book, A Deadly Episode. I mean, if we an know Anthony Horowitz, he’s a British mystery brother. I

00:57:02  Barry Ritholtz: Know the name. Yeah. My wife is a fan of those. So she, yeah.

00:57:05  Sheila Bair: Well, she burns through those. Yeah. He’s quite prolific. Yeah.

00:57:07  Right. He, he was the young, he, he was actually chosen by the Ian Fleming estate to continue writing. He’s written two. They’re really good.

00:57:14  Yeah. I actually like

00:57:16  Barry Ritholtz: Tofl owned by Amazon.

00:57:19  Sheila Bair: That’s right. That’s right. So, so yeah. And then I’m reading John Hershey’s Hiroshima.

00:57:25  My family and I are going to Japan at the end of the month. And I wanted to, I’m dying to go take them. Yeah. Yeah.

00:57:29  And I, the kids kind of bought, I said, we’re gonna go to Hiroshima. ’cause I think that’s an important part of history. You need to, we need to see this and, and understand it. And I read Hiroshima when I was young, you know, probably, you know, high school.

00:57:41  Right. I think when it came out and, and it had such an impact on me in so media again. And it still has an impact on me. And especially everything going on in the world now.

00:57:49  And other countries, even Japan talking about wanting to have a nuclear capability because things just don’t seem very unsettled on that score right now. So that’s, those are my two. I usually have two books going. One nonfiction and one fiction.

00:58:02  Barry Ritholtz: So yeah. So I’m gonna recommend a book to you. Okay. It’s just really kind of fascinating.

00:58:06  An American who’s a professor somewhere in, in the uk, Brian Klaus with two As. And the book is called Fluke. And the book starts with this story of a young couple honeymooning in Kyoto. Later in life, the husband becomes the head of the war department.

00:58:29  And when we have to figure out where to drop the abo, he absolutely vetoes Kyoto And Hiroshima is what gets, is what gets true because this couple went there for a honeymoon. Oh, that’s really interesting. That country, that city is spared. And then it wasn’t supposed to be Nagasaki, it was in, I don’t remember what city it was, but there was cloud cover and they couldn’t, back then you were doing visual reads.

00:58:59  Right. You couldn’t see. So they went to the secondary target. Yeah.

00:59:03  And so think about, talk about flukes. Yeah. How random things are. Yeah.

00:59:08  So Hiroshima gets it because somebody went there on a honeymoon.

00:59:12  Sheila Bair: On a honeymoon. Just crazy. Well, and now you look back and why did any city get it? Couldn’t you drop it over the ocean or something?

00:59:17  You wanna make a point? I mean, really. I don’t, it’s hard for me, me to understand now. I know.

00:59:22  And that’s just, you know, we are not there at the time. There was a lot of

00:59:26  Barry Ritholtz: The psychology during

00:59:27  Sheila Bair: War time. Yeah. So different. And the Japanese had been, everybody had been horrible, but the Japanese had done some brutal things.

00:59:33  Well, for

00:59:33  Barry Ritholtz: Centuries.

00:59:34  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, okay. All right. Speak

00:59:35  Barry Ritholtz: To speak to China. Korea. Not I’m, no, no. I’m a big fan of Japan.

00:59:42  Yeah. But no, but they were quite a, they in China Ruthless Empire

00:59:45  Sheila Bair: For a long time. Yeah. Yeah. So there was a lot of, so I understand that.

00:59:49  And I think, well, maybe the horror of it when, you know, and the, and I think that’s why John Hershey’s book was so important. ’cause it really underscored the horror of it. But maybe because people then understood how horrible it was, it made it even less likely every anybody would ever use it again. I’m gonna, I’m gonna rationalize it that way.

01:00:05  But it is hard. You know, you look back and, oh my gosh, did we really have to do that to people? Because it was, it was not just the people who probably were killed immediately were the lucky ones. Oh yeah.

01:00:14  The radiation sickness after the horrors

01:00:17  Barry Ritholtz: Slow up. I think I signed that same book in, in high school and

01:00:20  Sheila Bair: Everybody read it. Yeah.

01:00:21  Barry Ritholtz: And plowed through it. And it was just,

01:00:23  Sheila Bair: It was, yeah. No, it’s very well written. It was. Yeah.

01:00:26  Barry Ritholtz: Let, let’s shift to, are you streaming anything these days? You listen to any podcasts? I don’t. Or watching anything.

01:00:31  Yeah.

01:00:32  Sheila Bair: I don’t stream or podcasts that much. I get podcaster, I like to read transcripts of podcasts ’cause I can read a lot Faster. Faster. That’s what I can listen

01:00:39  Barry Ritholtz: Faster. Yeah. How, how about Netflix or HBO or anything like that? Yeah.

01:00:42  Sheila Bair: You know, again, I’m, I’m, you know, one note on this murder, BBC, I’m there, you know, I love the murder mystery box box. Yeah. The, all the, all the agathe IES I’ve seen in the, the David Che prose are by far the best. Foils war was great.

01:00:58  Also, Anthony Horowitz, the, he did a, the, the,

01:01:02  Barry Ritholtz: They made it into a series or a movie.

01:01:05  Sheila Bair: Which one? The Foils War. Foils of War. Foils War.

01:01:07  Actually, that was, that was a TV series. It wasn’t a book. That was one of the few things. But it’s, it’s, it’s, it’s really good.

01:01:13  I like the, the Morse. You know, have you ever watched Morse Inspector Morse? No. That’s, that’s so famous.

01:01:19  Sounds me familiar. It

01:01:20  Barry Ritholtz: Used to be on PBS at one point.

01:01:21  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Yeah. It’s old. But there were three Morse and then Endeavor, which was about Morse when he was younger.

01:01:27  And then Lewis, who was Morse’s sidekick. So BBC did a really good job there. So yeah, these are old stuff. I recycle ’em.

01:01:33  But yeah, I, I love, I love BBC and I love British. I love British Redbox. Excuse me. I love

01:01:38  Barry Ritholtz: Our final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in banking or finance or government service?

01:01:50  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, I would say be open-minded, because I think the job market is, you know, we don’t know. AI is kind of having a negative impact on entry level white collar jobs. So they’re need to be thoughtful about that and how to navigate that.

01:02:05  So I think you need to be open-minded. But preferably, if you have options, you know, pick, pick a company that has a good culture. I, you know, ask them how they think about their customers. Right.

01:02:17  If they’re an investment firm and they talk about them like, Muppets, you probably don’t wanna work there. But if they talk, talk about them as

01:02:24  Barry Ritholtz: I remember Muppets

01:02:25  Sheila Bair: Mpe. Yeah. Just to mention an example. So I think, I think it’s important, any business actually, whether it’s finance or any real economy business, how they think about their customers and treat their customers.

01:02:36  ’cause I do think long, long-term success is based on having a mutually beneficial relationship with your customers. So I would, and, you know, just the work ethic and, but, and again, keep an open mind. Sometimes things you weren’t even thinking about come up and they turn out to be really, really good job choices.

01:02:52  Barry Ritholtz: And our final question, what is it that you know about the world of banking regulations, government service, financial industry today might have been useful to know way back when, when you were first getting started. Yeah,

01:03:07  Sheila Bair: I thought about that. Markets, right? Not personal finance, but market. Clearly credit card debt

01:03:14  Barry Ritholtz: Go whichever way you want.

01:03:15  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, compounding was something I did or did not understand in credit card rates. That

01:03:20  Barry Ritholtz: Comes up surprisingly

01:03:22  Sheila Bair: Frequently. Yeah. Yeah.

01:03:22  Barry Ritholtz: So because it’s not intuitive.

01:03:23  Sheila Bair: Yeah. No, it’s not. And the, the daily compounding is, you know, it, it, it backs up pretty quickly, I think for markets, financial markets and investing in particular. I, I’ve actually done pretty well over time.

01:03:35  I was, my grandmother gave me a thousand dollars when she was getting later in life near her death. And she didn’t have much, but she wanted to give my sister and I something. So she gave me a thousand dollars and told me to put it in IRA. That was back when IRAs had just gotten started.

01:03:50  And with my dad’s self, I put it in the contra fund. It’s worth a lot of money now. Right. So I, I’ve made some lucky I’ve, I’ve stuck mainly, I’ve picked a few stocks, but I’ve picked mainly diversified index funds of various sorts.

01:04:03  And I wish I’d understand better about being brave during the dips though. You know, I think I usually, I, I, I buy and hold, so I don’t, I don’t sell when the market’s going down, which is the worst thing you can do. But I think I would’ve been a little more courageous buying in the dips,

01:04:15  Barry Ritholtz: You know, buy, buying more into, into weakness. Yeah. Yeah. Well, well, Sheila, thank you for being so generous with your time.

01:04:21  As always, a delight. We have been speaking with Sheila Bear, former chair of the FDIC, author of the new book, how Not to Lose a Million Dollars. If you enjoy this conversation, well check out any of the 600 we’ve done over the past 12 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

01:04:44  I would be remiss if I didn’t thank the crack staff that helps put these conversations together each week. Alexis Noriega is my video producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. Anna Luke is my podcast producer.

01:04:59  I’m Barry Bri Holtz. You’ve been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio Video.

 

~~~

 

 

 

The post Transcript: Shelia Bair, former FDIC Chair appeared first on The Big Picture.

"Taiwan Loses Its Strategic Importance In 18 Months," Says Chamath Palihapitiya

Zero Hedge -

"Taiwan Loses Its Strategic Importance In 18 Months," Says Chamath Palihapitiya

In an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier that aired Friday, President Trump said that he doesn't want "to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war" over Taiwan.

"I'm not looking to have somebody to go independent and, you know, we're supposed to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war," Trump told Baier. "I'm not looking for that. I want them to cool down. I want China to cool down."

Taiwan has been a major point of friction between Washington and Beijing. Last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC News that the issue was not a key topic during Trump's summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

The initial White House readout of the summit also did not mention Taiwan, home to the world's most advanced semiconductor production.

Taiwan is strategically important for three main reasons:

  • It is indispensable to global semiconductor production.

  • It sits at the center of the Western Pacific security architecture.

  • It remains a major flashpoint in U.S.-China relations.

In other words, Taiwan is critically important to the U.S. because it is not only a semiconductor production supernode, but also a geopolitical fortress against China and a potential flashpoint in U.S.-China relations.

However, Chamath Palihapitiya, CEO of Social Capital and part of the All-In podcast, pointed out that Taiwan could be on track to lose one of its most strategic advantages in the next 18 months.

Palihapitiya continued:

We're 18 months from Taiwan not being an important moment of conversation the way it is today.

Why 18 months? Because we are at a point where we're probably 1-2 nanometers away from being able to do what we need Taiwan to strategically do for us.

And so as we scale up our chip fabs, as we get more capacity, and interestingly, there are these orthogonal technologies being developed.

I don't know if you guys saw, but Neuralink was showcasing a machine that is literally operating at the almost nanometer scale to do the brain operations for the implantation, all automatically.

When you have the dexterity and the capability mechanically to make these things, the real reason then is a very different one than what it is today.

Today, it's economic. And if you take that off the table, I think we'll have a very different attitude to Taiwan.

Palihapitiya's take on the rise of U.S. chip fabs, many of which are based in Arizona and could soon turn the state into the new Taiwan, drew backlash on X, notably from geopolitical risk analyst Ian Bremmer, who said, "This is Trump's perspective: the only thing that matters about Taiwan is the chips. Very different from the view of U.S. allies in the region: Japan, South Korea, and Australia."

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:54

"Please Work Remote": NYC Braces For Commuter Chaos With Ongoing LIRR Strike

Zero Hedge -

"Please Work Remote": NYC Braces For Commuter Chaos With Ongoing LIRR Strike

Welcome to day three of the Long Island Rail Road strike, which is set to cause commuter chaos this morning in the New York City area, as more than 3,500 workers across five unions walked off the job Saturday after contract talks with the MTA collapsed.

Negotiations between the MTA and unions resumed Sunday and are set to continue Monday morning.

The MTA has urged riders to work remotely today and is deploying up to 275 free shuttle buses, though that capacity only covers a tiny fraction of the LIRR's nearly 300,000 weekday riders.

It seems that Socialist NYC Mayor Mandami finally got his promise of free buses, but at the cost of a strike and commuter chaos.

The disruption could also snarl travel to Long Island beach destinations over Memorial Day weekend, including the Hamptons.

Some employers, including JPMorgan and Citigroup, have advised affected workers to consider remote work this week.

The National Mediation Board, a federal agency that oversees labor disputes, summoned both sides late Sunday evening to continue negotiations, but no resolution was found. Talks are expected later today.

A spokesman for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters stated that their wage proposal was reasonable and that two federal review panels had sided with them.

"We remain ready to negotiate a fair agreement at any time and get back to work on behalf of Long Island commuters," the statement said.

The union wrote on X, "After more than three years with no raises, LIRR's union workers, including 500 Teamsters locomotive engineers, will not make any more sacrifices to cover for the MTA's mismanagement."

What an absolute mess for commuters this morning.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:45

Futures Slide After Bond Yields, Oil Prices Jump Around The Globe

Zero Hedge -

Futures Slide After Bond Yields, Oil Prices Jump Around The Globe

Futures are lower, but off their overnight lows as markets focus on soaring global yields after US/Iran talk progress remains stalled (but at least armed hostilities did not resume contrary to some speculation). Yields also spiked on rising oil prices, concerns of an extra budget in Japan and continued political chaos in the UK. As of 7:00am ET, S&P futures are -0.5%, while Nasdaq futures drop 0.3%; semis are bid, Mag7 are mostly lower ex-NVDA which reports earnings this week. Semis / AI are the bullish story pre-mkt with most names flat to down with the market expressing a slight preference for Defensives over Cyclicals. In other news, US-China will set up a trade/investment board, and China will increase Ag purchases from the US. Bond yields are flat to +1bp with the 10Y at 4.60% after last week's meltup;Japan’s 30-year yield surged as much as 20 basis points before paring most of the move on what may have been another round of BOJ intervention. Treasuries and European bonds were little changed, while the dollar was set to snap a five-day run of wins as it reverses overnight gains. In commodities, Energy is leading but crude prices have cut their gains: Brent trades around $11 after Trump warned that the “clock is ticking” for Iran to reach a deal that will end the war. Metals are weaker and Ags are bid. Today's macro data focus is on TIC, housing price index, and NY Fed activity indicator. 

In premarket trading, Nvidia is the only Mag 7 member rising: the $6 trillion semiconductor giant is slated to report first quarter results on Wednesday (Nvidia +0.8%, Alphabet -0.6%, Microsoft -0.6%, Apple -0.8%, Meta -0.9%, Amazon -1%, Tesla -1.1%)

  • Shares in UnitedHealth (UNH) fall 5.3% after Berkshire Hathaway exited its stake in the health insurer. The conglomerate also disclosed that it amassed a $2.6 billion stake in Delta Air Lines (DAL), boosting the carrier’s shares by 2.4%.
  • EchoStar (SATS), Rocket Lab (RKLB) and AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) rise as billionaire Elon Musk said he’s back in Texas working on plans for an initial public offering of SpaceX.
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN) falls 10% after the drugmaker’s phase 3 data for fianlimab in metastatic melanoma fell short of expectations. Citi downgraded its rating on the stock following the “disappointing” trial update.

The standoff in the Middle East shows no signs of easing after more than two months, puncturing an AI-driven rally that has pushed global stocks to record highs. Over the weekend, Trump said the “clock is ticking” for Iran to reach a deal, while G7 finance chiefs’ two-day meeting in Paris starts today, focusing on mounting imbalances and rare earths. Meanwhile, bond yields have climbed to levels seen decades ago on fears that central banks will lift interest rates and governments will ramp up borrowing to cushion the blow from rising energy prices. Japan’s 30-year yield surged as much as 20 basis points before paring most of the move.

“Bonds were more nervous about the inflation picture and the equity market was comforted and encouraged by the very strong earnings and AI-led optimism,” said Willem Sels, global chief investment officer at HSBC Private Bank. “What you now have is a bit of a catch-up movement in the equity market, a bit of an exhaustion of the momentum.”

As a fragile ceasefire between the US and Iran extends past 40 days and a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz remains elusive, President Donald Trump expressed frustration with Tehran and told it the “clock is ticking.” Earlier, drones targeted a nuclear power plant in the United Arab Emirates.

Elsewhere, at a time when markets expect the Federal Reserve under Kevin Warsh to hike rates as soon as December, minutes from last month’s meeting due for release Wednesday will give investors clues about policymakers’ thinking. “The absence of a near-term bullish catalyst can continue to pressure bonds, with spillover effects to exuberant equities,” said Laura Cooper, global investment strategist and head of macro at Nuveen. “Signs of conflict de-escalation are likely needed to assuage jittery markets.” 

Ed Yardeni wrote that the Fed needed to catch up with bond markets or risk losing control of borrowing costs. If the Fed fails to remove its easing bias, “investors will conclude that the central bank is falling behind the inflation curve and will demand a higher inflation risk premium,” Yardeni wrote. “We expect the Fed to hold rates unchanged at the June meeting and shift to a tightening policy stance.”

Meanwhile, the higher yields rise, the more bullish Wall Street strategists turn. Six out of the 21 strategists polled by Bloomberg have raised their target for the S&P 500 over the past month. Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson retains high conviction of an earnings recovery and broadening thesis, while noting the 10-year yield at the critical 4.50% threshold could be more of a “noticeable headwind” for equity multiples.

Bloomberg News interviewed 32 investment managers across the US, Asia and Europe who were overwhelmingly bullish, with 80% expecting equities to outperform other asset classes over the next three to six months. The top investment choice for about half of these buy-side professionals is megacap tech and AI stocks. Most investors interviewed pointed to the yield on 30-year Treasuries holding sustainably above 5% as the biggest threat to stocks. Perhaps they have been reading Michael Hartnett who has repeatedly said 5% on the 30Y is the "door to doom."

And while the tech-fueled stock rally is looking bubble-like to some investors, timing the pop is tough. Some are turning to exotic options that better protect against an eventual slump. Single-stock volatility — especially in parts of the tech sector such as semiconductors — far outpace relatively mild increases in indexes. 

d

In Europe, consumer and auto shares drove a 0.4% decline in the Stoxx 600, although stocks have trimmed some early declines Monday as last week’s selloff in bonds eased and energy shares outperformed.  Here are the biggest movers Monday:

  • Technoprobe shares rise as much as 7.7% to a record high, extending last week’s results-driven gains after an upgrade for the chip-testing equipment maker from Bank of America, which lifted its target price to a Street-high of €38
  • Sonova shares rise as much as 4.4%, the biggest gainer in the Stoxx 600 Health Care Index, after the Swiss hearing-aid maker’s full-year adjusted Ebita beat the average analyst estimate
  • FLSmidth gains as much as 5.3%, the most since April 8, after Nordea and Danske Bank upgraded their views on the Danish industrial equipment maker to buy from hold, with Nordea quoting a positive risk/reward profile
  • Publicis shares climb as much as 5.8% on Monday after the advertising agency increased its earnings growth targets for the next two years, following a $2.2 billion deal to buy US-based data collaboration platform LiveRamp
  • Draegerwerk shares rise as much as 4.7%, rebounding from a four-month low, after the medical and safety equipment maker was upgraded
  • Deutsche Boerse shares outperformed Monday after a regulatory filing showed Chris Hohn’s activist hedge fund TCI Fund Management has increased its voting rights in the German market operator to 5.15%
  • Smart Eye rises as much as 12%, the most since November, after the Swedish eye-tracking technology company reported what DNB Carnegie called a “solid” set of results, with Ebitda showing a “clear improvement”
  • Ipsen shares drop as much as 5.6%, the most since July last year, following the French biopharma company’s trial data for its experimental frown-lines treatment corabotase
  • Future shares slide as much as 10% after Stifel downgrades the publisher to hold from buy, saying it will take time for the firm to find new ways to monetize its content, as new AI tools threaten the search market
  • Alleima falls as much as 7.5%, the most since January, after Swedish business daily Dagens Industri recommended in a column that readers sell shares in the specialty steels group, flagging a weakening order book and rising short interest
  • Advanced Medical Solutions shares drop as much as 24%, the most since September 2023, after TA Associates confirmed late on Friday that it won’t make an offer for the London-listed firm

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks fell for a second session, as stalled progress on ending the Iran war and higher oil prices intensified concerns about inflation and economic growth. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index dropped as much as 1.4%, before paring losses. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Toyota Motor Corp. and Mitsubishi Corp. were among the biggest contributors to the losses. Benchmarks in Indonesia, Hong Kong and Australia all fell over 1%. Bucking the trend, South Korean stocks reversed losses of as much as 4.7%, as optimism over progress in Samsung Electronics Co.’s labor talks helped offset pressure from rising bond yields. Behind the global debt selloff and stock market weakness was a third consecutive day of oil price gains, after President Donald Trump renewed pressure on Iran to resolve the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Following the recent rally driven by optimism about artificial intelligence, equities investors are now shifting their attention back to the risk of worsening inflation. Separately, Chinese shares fell after data showed the country’s economic growth slowed across the board in April. 

In FX, The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is down 0.1%, while the pound takes top spot among G-10 currencies, rising 0.4% against the greenback. The yen is lagging.

In rates, treasuries erased an earlier drop, leaving US 10-year yields flat at 4.60%. US yields are cheaper by 1bp to 2bp across the curve with spreads trading broadly within a basis point of Friday close. US 10-year yields trade around 4.6% with gilts outperforming by around 3bp in the sector. Bunds are steady, while gilts are outperforming, with UK 10-year yields down 3 bps to 5.14% as UK gilts steadied after last week’s sharp selloff.  During Asia session, Japan’s 30-year yield surged as much as 20 basis points before paring most of the move as inflation fears continue to ripple through global bond market. IG dollar issuance slate includes a couple of names. Estimates from dealers for this week point to about $40 billion in bond sales. Treasury auctions this week include $16 billion 20-year bonds (Wednesday) and $19 billion 10-year TIPS reopening (Thursday)/

In commodities, Brent crude futures pulled back from their overnight highs to trade around $110 a barrel, helping arrest a selloff in global government bonds.

Economic data slate includes May New York Fed services business activity (8:30am), May NAHB housing market index (10am) and March TIC flows (4pm). Fed speaker slate empty for the session

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini -0.4%
  • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.2%
  • Russell 2000 mini -0.3%
  • Stoxx Europe 600 -0.3%
  • DAX +0.2%
  • CAC 40 -0.7%
  • 10-year Treasury yield little changed at 4.6%
  • VIX +0.6 points at 19
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index -0.1% at 1201.01
  • euro +0.1% at $1.1639
  • WTI crude +1.1% at $106.54/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • President Trump told Axios in a phone call that "the clock is ticking" for Iran and warned that if the Iranian regime doesn't come with a better offer for a deal, "they are going to get hit much harder." Axios
  • Trump declined to give a specific deadline for negotiations with Iran and will hold a Situation Room meeting with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss possible options for military action, while he spoke with Israeli PM Netanyahu about the situation in Iran, according to Axios. Trump also stated that he still thinks Iran wants a deal and he is waiting for an updated Iranian proposal, which he hopes will be better than the prior offer. Furthermore, Axios’s Ravid reported that Trump threatened that attacks would resume with greater intensity if the Iranian regime does not come up with a better proposal, while Channel 12’s Kraus posted that President Trump said in a phone call that he thinks the Iranians should be afraid of what’s going on right now.
  • China’s industrial output and retail sales growth slowed sharply last month while investment dropped as policymakers warned that geopolitical conflicts were creating a “severe” global economic environment. Industrial production rose 4.1 per cent in April from a year earlier, official data showed on Monday. FT
  • Chinese artificial intelligence groups have moved ahead of US rivals in video generation, a key battleground in generative AI in which there is rapid uptake across advertising, ecommerce and entertainment. FT
  • China agreed to buy at least $17 billion of farm products annually through 2028 and establish trade and investment boards, the US announced. Earlier, Beijing said the two countries will also reduce tariffs on certain goods. BBG
  • Japan's government is likely to issue fresh debt as part of funding for a planned extra budget to cushion the economic blow from the Middle East war. Any additional debt issuance would further strain Japan's ‌already worsening finances and may accelerate rises in long-term interest rates. RTRS
  • Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni asked the European Commission to extend greater latitude within European Union budget rules to measures aimed at tackling rising energy costs. Italy’s government is seeking to include investments and extraordinary measures to address the energy crisis in the so-called national safeguard clause. BBG
  • NextEra is said to be in talks to buy Dominion in a mostly stock deal valuing the utility at about $66 billion. BBG
  • Anthropic agreed to brief members of the Financial Stability Board on its AI model Mythos. FT
  • Over 60 allies of US President Trump have urged him to test and approve the most powerful AI models before its released: Axios 
  • Central banks’ gold purchases are expected to pick up to average 60 tons a month over 2026. We maintain a bullish target for prices to climb to $5,400 an ounce by the end of the year. Goldman
  • Trump told Fortune he thinks US could sell Intel (INTC) shares slowly over time without tanking the stock market. He added that "Intel should be the biggest company in the world right now... If I had been president when all these companies started sending their chips in from China, I would have put a tariff on that would have protected Intel."

Iran Headlines

  • US President Trump warned on Truth Social that the clock is ticking for Iran and that they better get moving fast, or there won’t be anything left for them, and that time is of the essence.
  • US President Trump declined to give a specific deadline for negotiations with Iran and will hold a Situation Room meeting with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss possible options for military action, while he spoke with Israeli PM Netanyahu about the situation in Iran, according to Axios. Trump also stated that he still thinks Iran wants a deal and he is waiting for an updated Iranian proposal, which he hopes will be better than the prior offer. Furthermore, Axios’s Ravid reported that Trump threatened that attacks would resume with greater intensity if the Iranian regime does not come up with a better proposal, while Channel 12’s Kraus posted that President Trump said in a phone call that he thinks the Iranians should be afraid of what’s going on right now.
  • Pakistan shared revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night, according to Pakistani sources. The course added that "we don't have much time", adding that both countries "keep changing their goalposts".
  • Western sources say the new Iranian proposal includes a commitment of unclear value not to produce nuclear weapons but no mention of uranium or Hormuz, according to Journalist Segal.
  • Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Baghaei said talks with the US continue through Pakistani mediation. The spokesperson added that they have made great efforts for safe movement and protection of the Strait of Hormuz and are in constant contact with Oman to develop a mechanism. On Uranium, Baghaei said Tehran does not need any party to recognize its right to uranium enrichment and will not discuss during negotiations with the US.
  • Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik warned of a regretful response to enemies and said that Iranian armed forces are fully prepared to confront any potential attack by the US and Israeli regime, according to IRNA.
  • Iranian Major General Rezaei said Iran is serious about diplomacy and negotiations, but is more serious about dealing with the aggressor, while he added that the US must now prove its good intentions and that Iranian armed forces are on the trigger as diplomatic efforts continue.
  • Iran said transit through the Strait of Hormuz would flow again once its conflict with the US and Israel is over, although the sides remain far from resolving their differences, according to Bloomberg. In relevant news, three cargo-empty, US-sanctioned tankers reportedly slipped through the US naval blockade in recent days, according to TankerTrackers.com.
  • Israel said it carried out a Gaza strike targeting the de facto head of Hamas's armed wing, while Israel also conducted an airstrike on the towns of Froun, Kfar Hounah and Zawtar al-Sharqiya in southern Lebanon. Furthermore, an Israeli air strike targeted Baalbek, Lebanon and killed an Islamic Jihad commander and his daughter.
  • UAE officials said a drone attack set off a fire near the UAE’s nuclear power station, while it was still investigating the source of the attack.
  • Saudi Defence Ministry said it intercepted three drones launched from Iraq after entering the kingdom’s airspace.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks were mostly in the red after last Friday's losses on Wall St, and with risk sentiment sapped as oil prices and yields extended higher after US President Trump warned the clock was ticking on Iran, heading into a meeting on Tuesday with his national security team to discuss possible options for military action, while participants in the region also digest disappointing Chinese activity data. ASX 200 was dragged lower amid losses across nearly all sectors aside from energy, and with sentiment not helped by disappointing data from Australia's largest trading partner. Nikkei 225 resumed its pullback from last week's record highs amid higher oil prices and the anticipation of the BoJ to resume rate normalisation next month. KOSPI was volatile as the index initially suffered heavy losses and the Korea Exchange triggered a sidecar after KOSPI 200 futures dropped 5.0% with jitters seen as Samsung Electronics faces an 18-day strike involving nearly 45,000 of Samsung’s unionised workers starting on May 21st. The index then staged a firm rebound alongside Samsung shares after the union said it would engage in government-mediated pay talks, and a court was said to partially accept an injunction request against the union's planned strike, although the union later announced that it would proceed with the strike as planned. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were pressured following the disappointing activity data in which Industrial Production, Retail Sales and Fixed Assets Ex-Rural Investment all missed forecasts, with the latter showing a surprise contraction, while the stats bureau noted the external situation is complex and that China's economic foundation still needs to be consolidated.

Top Asian news

  • China State Council said it will leverage national venture capital guidance fund to increase support for entrepreneurship in tech innovation.
  • Chinese MIIT Minister Li Lecheng said China should upgrade “outdated” industries, and not scrap them, because manufacturing remains the backbone of the economy.
  • China’s State Administration for Market Regulation set 34 priorities for this year to support private sector growth, with a focus on fair competition, legal protections and efficient regulation.
  • China's stats bureau said the external situation is complex and China's economic foundation still needs to be consolidated, while it added that China is to continue to optimise supply and that the domestic supply-demand imbalance remains prominent. China's stats bureau said China will continue to expand the domestic demand and should implement more active fiscal policies and moderately loose monetary policies. Furthermore, it said the international situation remains grim and complicated as of April, and the world economic recovery is facing greater headwinds, as well as stated that the will and capacity of people to spend needs improving.
  • Japan is likely to issue fresh debt as part of funding for a planned extra budget to soften the blow from the Middle East conflict, according to sources cited by Reuters. A separate report confirmed that Japanese PM Takaichi was set to announce an extra Japan budget. However, conflicting comments by Japanese Finance Minister Katayama followed, stating that they are not yet at a stage to talk about the specifics of an extra budget.
  • Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara said they are watching market moves with a high sense of urgency, including long-term rates. No comment on FX intervention.

European bourses (STOXX 600 -0.2%) opened entirely in the red this morning, given the lack of US-Iran progress, and further punchy rhetoric from President Trump. Over the weekend, he stated that the clock is ticking for Iran, though he declined to give a specific deadline. Since then, bourses have clambered off lows amidst positive geopolitical updates; notably, Iran’s Baghaei suggesting that talks with the US continue through Pakistani mediation. Moreover, Pakistani sources suggested that Pakistan shared a revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night.  European sectors opened with a clear negative bias, but this picture is now a little more mixed. Energy takes pole position, benefiting from higher underlying crude prices; Media and Utilities complete the top three. At the bottom of the pile reside cyclical sectors, such as Autos and Travel & Leisure. The latter has been pressured by post-earning losses in Ryanair after reporting in-line metrics, but warned that flat fares may put pressure on profits.

Top European News

  • UK PM Starmer has decided not to announce a departure timetable unless and until Andy Burnham wins the Makerfield by-election, ITV's Peston reported.
  • UK Deputy PM Lammy said PM Starmer will not be announcing a timetable for departure, speaking to Sky News.
  • UK PM Starmer was reportedly mulling whether he would bring more government stability by announcing a timetable for his departure and a leadership election, according to ITV.
  • Former UK Health Secretary Streeting vowed to stand in any Labour Party leadership contest to oust UK PM Starmer. In relevant news, Streeting said he would battle Manchester Mayor Burnham for the Labour leadership and called for the UK to rejoin the EU, while Burnham played down rejoining the EU.
  • UK Chancellor Reeves is reportedly to lay out more details in the week ahead regarding proposals to ease bank regulations that were imposed to prevent a repeat of the 2008 GFC.
  • Fitch affirmed Germany's sovereign rating at AAA; Outlook Stable, while DBRS maintained Portugal at A (high), Outlook Raised to Positive.

FX

  • FX shows a risk-on bias with high-beta outperforming and DXY in the red.
  • DXY firmed at the Asia reopen and rose to a 99.40 peak as participants digested US President Trump’s remarks over the weekend, “the clock is ticking for Iran.” However, with Brent crude falling from its USD 112/bbl peak (curr. 110/bbl), the index now trades modestly in the red, a touch above 99.00 where its 50 DMA lies. Nothing notable scheduled today, though the rest of the week sees weekly ADP jobs on Tuesday, FOMC Minutes + NVIDIA earnings Wednesday, Jobless Claims and PMIs Thursday and UoM on Friday.
  • GBP is one of the best G10 performers, likely a factor of technical factors than political reprieve with newsflow light heading into the likely June 18th by-election. EUR/GBP reversed from 0.8730, and Cable bounced from 1.33. On domestic politics, PM potential candidates Streeting and Burnham were on the wires talking up the importance of rejoining the EU. On the Fiscal/Consumer front, the Times reported Chancellor Reeves has plans to retain the cut on fuel duty from September amid fuel price concerns, while separately drawing up plans for a targeted intervention on energy bills - both potentially factors helping the Pound today. The week ahead sees Jobs on Tuesday, CPI on Wednesday and PSNB on Friday, the former which ING says is expected to be mild because of base effects.
  • JPY is the only G10 currency that trades lower against the buck amid: a) a weak 5yr JGB auction, b) reports that the Japanese government is to start compiling a supplementary budget, c) lack of Iran progress, and d) surging energy prices. (See Fixed Income 09:35 BST for more). USD/JPY +0.1%, up a touch despite earlier gains which were capped by the 159 mark.

Central Banks

  • BoE's Greene said some of the global economic resilience to the Iran war is due to inventories while second round effects of the energy price shock will not show up for another year. Should not be looking through negative supply shocks.
  • BoE's Breeden said the central bank should not be ‘trigger happy’ on rates, while she warned of a hit to business from political uncertainty, according to FT.

Fixed Income

  • A bearish start to the week as US President Trump's escalatory language on Iran and the associated energy move, with Brent peaking at USD 112/bbl overnight.
  • Amidst this, fixed benchmarks spent the APAC session in the red. Note, JGBs derived pressure from this alongside a weak 5yr outing and reports around the compiling of a supplementary Japanese budget, see 09:35 BST for more details.
  • USTs hit a 108-30 trough, a fresh contract low, in the early hours. Since, and particularly after remarks from the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, energy benchmarks have eased off, which has allowed fixed to lift, taking USTs to a 109-08 high with gains of one tick on the session. Today's US docket is quiet, but the week is busy with Nvidia due before the FOMC Minutes and a 20yr auction. From the Minutes, the last with Powell as Chair, BofA expects the account to "reinforce the Fed's recent hawkish tone", showing that Warsh will inherit a Fed with "little appetite to cut".
  • Bunds in-fitting with the above, hit a 123.74 base, which is also a new contract low. Given the discussed energy moves, the benchmark has pared much of its 53 ticks of downside and is now lower by a more modest c. 15 ticks, just off a 124.20 peak. Newsflow has been relatively limited, we had remarks from but no move to ECB's Lagarde, who essentially noted that she is watching the yield space. On yields, the German 10yr hit a 3.19% peak overnight, a new high for the year and the highest since 2011's 3.49% best. Furthermore, the energy moves continue to be reflected in near-term policy expectations, with 21bps of ECB tightening implied for June and 75bps by end-2026.
  • Gilts opened near-enough flat, as the bearish leads from overnight had already begun to moderate, in addition to the lack of significant weekend development on the fate of PM Starmer. Furthermore, the complex is perhaps deriving some support from a revival of coverage that contenders Burnham and Streeting would like to rejoin the EU at some point; albeit, Burnham did somewhat distance himself from this over the weekend, concerning the upcoming by-election campaigning at least. As it stands, Gilts are holding at highs of 85.53 with gains of c. 25 ticks. A bounce from the 84.96 base this morning, another contract low.
  • Japan sells JPY 1.9tln 5yr JGBs; b/c 3.22x (prev. 3.58x), average yield 2.024% (prev. 1.826%), Lowest accepted price 99.85 (prev. 99.84), Weighted average price 99.89 (prev. 99.88), Tail in price 0.05 (prev. 0.04).

Commodities

  • Crude futures surged at the start of Asia-Pac trade, with WTI making a new contract high of USD 104.37/bbl while Brent peaked at USD 112.00/bbl. Punchy rhetoric over the weekend by US President Trump, warning Iran that the “clock is ticking” and that “they better get moving, fast, or there won’t be anything left of them" initially spurred the upside in energy prices. However, benchmarks have pulled back as European trade gets underway, with WTI and Brent now trading at the lower end of its USD 101.59-104.37/bbl and USD 109.56-112/bbl range, respectively. More recently, according to Pakistani sources, Pakistan shared a revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night.
  • Spot gold briefly dipped below USD 4,500/oz amid higher energy prices as trade got underway but has since regained the handle and currently trading at the upper end of its USD 4481-4560/oz range. Jewellers in India have reported higher demand for the yellow metal, ahead of the wedding season, after Indian authorities hiked gold import tariffs and then later curbed the amount of gold that can be imported. Silver has also faced restrictions with tightening rules for imports, describing imports as now “restricted” rather than “free”. Spot silver is currently in a USD 73.71-76.76/oz range, consolidating following Friday’s selloff.
  • 3M LME Copper has started Monday’s trade on the backfoot, slipping back below USD 13.5k/t and falling closer towards last week’s trough of USD 13.4k/t. China’s growth slowed in April, with investment contracting while retail sales printed essentially flat Y/Y.

Trade/Tariffs

  • USTR Greer said President Trump will be presented with options for action on China if US investigations determine that industrial overcapacity is influencing Chinese exports.
  • White House released a Fact Sheet on Sunday following last week’s Trump-Xi summit, which stated that China will purchase at least USD 17bln in US agricultural products annually for 2026, 2027 and 2028.
  • EU is drawing up plans to force European companies to purchase critical components from at least three different suppliers, in an effort to lower the bloc’s reliance on China, according to FT.
  • France wants Stellantis (STLAM IM/STLAP FP) and Renault (RNO FP) to favour local parts suppliers to protect jobs and keep know-how in the region as Europe’s automakers deepen ties with manufacturers from China.
  • China flagged that Australian beef imports are approaching the safeguard threshold and are at the 80% of the annual quota, which caps imports at current tariff rates, while additional imports would be subject to 55% tariffs on top of existing tariffs three days after shipments reach 100% of the quota.

Geopolitics (ex Iran)

  • Ukraine upped the pressure on Russia with the biggest strike on Moscow in over a year involving dozens of drones on Sunday, according to WSJ.
  • Russian drones hit Odessa and damaged residential homes, according to Interfax.
  • Ukrainian manufacturers and officials warned the EU’s plan to slash steel imports would hurt Ukraine.
  • Intelligence claimed that Cuba has acquired more than 300 military drones and recently began discussing plans to use them to attack the US base at Guantanamo Bay, US military vessels and possibly Key West, Florida, according to Axios, which added that the intelligence could become a pretext for US military action and shows the degree to which the Trump administration sees Cuba as a threat.
  • Taiwan’s President Lai said on Sunday that Taiwan will never be sacrificed or traded, after US President Trump recently described a planned USD 14bln arms sale to Taipei as a bargaining chip with China.

US Event Calendar

  • 8;30am: May New York Fed services business activity
  • 10:00am: May NAHB housing market index
  • 4:00pm: March TIC flows 

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

Today is my annual thank you message for voting for the UK in Eurovision. Despite all your support, we finished last for the third time since 2019, and it was the fourth successive year of "nul points" from the public vote. To be fair listening to the song, I was impressed it finished as high as last! The winning song from Bulgaria is perhaps 30-40 years too modern for me but was at least quite catchy!

Moving onto more serious matters, the Iran war is 80 days old as of today, with no obvious end in sight, whilst the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. Notably though, the truce and ceasefire period (41 days) has now lasted longer than the initial kinetic phase (39 days). While an end to the ceasefire clearly cannot be ruled out, the fact this stalemate has persisted for so long suggests the US would prefer to avoid that route, given the political and economic consequences—particularly the political ones in an election year. As a result, the tense stalemate continues.
Nevertheless, the fragile nature of the ceasefire was exposed over the weekend when a drone attack caused a fire at an electrical generator at a UAE nuclear facility. Moreover, Trump suggested on Truth Social yesterday: "For Iran, the clock is ticking, and they better get moving, FAST, or there won't be anything left of them. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!" Trump and Israel’s PM Netanyahu spoke last night, which could prove to be a key conversation in determining the next stage of the conflict.

For markets, the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the prospect of a fresh escalation has pushed oil prices higher this morning. Brent crude is up +1.77% to a two-week high of $111.19/bbl. And it’s clear that investors are pricing in a more protracted conflict, as the 6-month brent future is also up to $92.14/bbl this morning, which would be its highest closing level since the conflict began.
Those oil moves have exacerbated fears about a stagflationary shock, which has pushed global bond yields even higher this morning. For instance, the 10yr Treasury yield (+3.2bps) is now up to 4.63%, its highest level in the last year, whilst the 30yr yield (+3.4bps) is up to 5.15%, which would be another post-2007 high. It’s a similar story in Japan this morning, where the 10yr JGB yield (+4.8bps) is up to 2.75%, a level last seen in 1997, and the 30yr yield (+9.3bps) is up to 4.11%, the highest since that maturity was first issued in 1999. That also follows comments from PM Takaichi, who said she’d asked the finance minister “to consider ways of funding including compiling a supplementary budget”. Indeed, Reuters reported the government was likely to issue fresh debt to fund part of it.

Stagflation fears have continued to hit risk assets as well, with the major equity indices moving lower in Asia this morning. In addition, the latest activity data in China was weaker than expected. Retail sales were only up +0.2% year-on-year in April (vs. +2.0% expected), whilst industrial production was up +4.1% yoy (vs. +6.0% expected). That backdrop has seen equities fall overnight, including the Nikkei (-0.83%), the Hang Seng (-1.35%), the CSI 300 (-0.69%) and the Shanghai Comp (-0.22%). That’s been echoed in the US and Europe too, where futures on the S&P 500 (-0.60%) and the DAX (-0.94%) are both lower as well. The only clear exception is South Korea’s KOSPI (+0.45%).

Those overnight declines follow several landmark bond moves in a global rout last week. Admittedly, if you look over the entire conflict, bond yields have moved in lockstep with oil, and Friday doesn’t look too anomalous. However, if you zoom in a bit, then yields have shifted from being broadly in line with the current price of oil to looking a bit high relative to it. That suggests some evidence of a small decoupling on Friday. With these end-of-week moves, 30yr US yields hit their highest level since 2007, 30yr Japanese yields their highest since their introduction in 1999, 30yr gilts reached levels last seen in 1997, and 30yr German yields returned to 2011 levels. You can see more details of the move in the review of last week towards the end. One thing to be aware of for risk assets is the relatively subdued reaction so far in the MOVE (bond volatility) index. This is the bond variable that most closely correlates with risk assets. It is currently around 80 and spent most of the period between early 2022 and early 2024 in a range of 100 to 150, so it remains relatively low so far which limits the impact of the rate shock.

Regardless, the bond move will no doubt be a major topic at the two-day G7 finance ministers’ meeting starting today in Paris. The meeting was billed as an opportunity to discuss global imbalances, such as the US budget deficit, China’s huge trade surplus, and Europe’s lack of investment. That might get a little overtaken by events.

This meeting follows on from last week’s Xi–Trump meeting in Beijing, which can best be characterised after the event, as a “summit lite”. It produced few concrete economic or geopolitical outcomes, with both sides emphasising stability and continued dialogue rather than agreements. Despite market hopes, China offered no assistance in reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and the US position remained unchanged on Taiwan, semiconductor controls, rare earths and AI cooperation. For markets, the key takeaway was what did not happen: there was no escalation, but also no progress on the issues that matter most to investors.

Another hot topic right now is the UK, where there’s been a lot of political turmoil in the last week. That helped push the 30yr gilt up +21.3bps, which was a clear underperformance, whilst the pound sterling had its worst week against the US dollar since 2024. That came as a route opened for Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham to return to Parliament, because a Labour MP resigned and a by-election will now be held. That’s significant for markets, because Burnham is seen as a contender for the Labour leadership, and he said in September last year that the UK should not be “in hock to the bond markets”. Although he’s since walked back his interpretation of those comments, markets are likely to fear higher fiscal spending with Burnham as PM. So the focus is now on that by-election, which the BBC have reported will be on June 18. Burnham has been cleared by Labour’s ruling NEC to stand as well. However, there’s no guarantee he will win the by-election, as it’s a marginal seat for Labour and Nigel Farage’s Reform UK performed very strongly there at the local elections earlier this month. Much will depend on how aggressively the Green Party contests the seat and splits the left-wing vote.

Looking at the week ahead, Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday, with a market capitalisation now of $5.46tn, could well be the main event. Elsewhere, we have the global flash PMIs on Thursday, along with inflation data from Canada tomorrow, the UK on Wednesday, and Japan on Friday. From central banks, the highlight will be the FOMC minutes on Wednesday. Those flash PMIs will be important, as they’re one of the first indicators on how the global economy has performed this month, so will be scrutinised for any signs of how the war in Iran is impacting activity and prices.

The US calendar is relatively light, with the NAHB housing market index today expected to remain unchanged at a cyclically low 34, followed by Tuesday’s pending home sales, where a modest +1.0% increase is anticipated (from +1.5% previously). Attention will then turn to Thursday’s April housing activity data, where housing starts are expected to ease to an annualised pace of 1.425mn (from 1.502mn), while permits are projected to tick higher to 1.375mn (from 1.363mn). All estimates are according to our economists.

Beyond housing, Thursday is the key day for macro releases. The weekly initial jobless claims are expected to edge slightly lower to 209k (from 211k). The same day will also bring the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing survey, where our economists expect a pullback to +21.0 (from +26.7), alongside the flash PMIs. In the US, manufacturing is expected to soften marginally to 53.7 (from 54.5), while services are seen ticking up to 51.5 (from 51.0).

In contrast to consumer sentiment—which will see an updated reading of the Michigan survey on Friday (expected at 48.2 versus 49.8 previously)—business surveys have generally remained more resilient despite the energy shock. That said, some indicators have shown rising input costs and lengthening delivery times, developments that could signal renewed inflationary pressure building beneath the surface.
Turning to central bank communications, the Fed speaker slate is relatively limited but still notable. Governor Waller is scheduled to participate in an ECB policy panel tomorrow, alongside comments from Philadelphia Fed President Harker (voter) on the outlook. On Wednesday, Vice Chair Barr will discuss consumer financial health metrics, while the Fed will also publish the minutes from the April FOMC meeting. Richmond Fed President Barkin (non-voter) will follow on Thursday with remarks on the economy, before Governor Waller rounds out the week with a further appearance on Friday.

In Europe, the highlights will include the UK labour market report tomorrow and inflation data on Wednesday. Our UK economist expects headline CPI to slow to 2.98% YoY and core CPI to fall to 2.61% YoY. More detail and forecasts are in the full inflation spotlight note here. The UK will also release the GfK May consumer confidence index and April retail sales on Friday. Other notable European releases include Eurozone consumer confidence on Thursday and Germany’s Ifo survey on Friday.

In Asia, Japan faces a busy week, with key data including Q1 GDP tomorrow and April nationwide CPI on Friday. Our Chief Japan economist expects positive real growth of an annualised 1.3% QoQ for the GDP report and sees core CPI inflation, excluding fresh food, holding at 1.8% YoY, alongside a retreat in core-core inflation, excluding fresh food and energy, to 2.2% (from 2.4% in March). The full week-ahead preview for Japan is available here.

Finally, beyond Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday, results are also due from major US retailers, including Walmart, Home Depot, and TJX.
Recapping last week now, the main story was the global bond selloff, with yields hitting new highs in multiple countries. That came as the Strait of Hormuz remained blocked, and Trump said that the US-Iran ceasefire was on “massive life support”, which helped to drive further gains for oil prices. So Brent crude ended the week up +7.87% (+3.35% Friday) at $109.26/bbl. Moreover, those inflation fears were exacerbated by strong CPI and PPI reports from the US, which led to mounting anticipation about a Fed rate hike this year. Indeed, the probability of a hike by the December meeting surged from 6% the previous week to 62% by Friday’s close. And over in Europe, the probability of an ECB hike at the June meeting was up from 79% the previous week to 89% by Friday’s close.

That backdrop led to significant pressure on sovereign bonds. In fact, 10yr Treasury yields were up +23.9bps last week (+11.1bps Friday) to 4.59%, their highest level since May 2025. Meanwhile, the 2yr Treasury yield was up +18.6bps (+5.2bps Friday) to 4.07%, its highest level since February 2025. And the biggest milestone came for 30yr yields, which rose +18.2bps (+8.9bps) to a post-2007 high of 5.12%. Similarly, in Germany 10yr bunds rose +16.2bps (+12.4bps Friday) to 3.17%, their highest level since 2011.

Here in the UK, gilts struggled in particular as the political turmoil showed no sign of easing. Notably, there were multiple ministerial resignations from PM Keir Starmer’s government, and Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham announced he would seek to return to Parliament in a by-election. So 10yr gilt yields rose +26.0bps last week (+17.8bps Friday), closing at a post-2008 high of 5.17%. Meanwhile, the pound weakened -2.24% against the US Dollar, marking its worst weekly performance since 2024.

For equities, there was a relatively stronger performance, with the S&P 500 just about posting a 7th consecutive weekly gain, up +0.13%. That’s its longest run of weekly gains since 2023, even as Friday saw its worst day since March (-1.24%) amidst the rise in bond yields and oil. Non-US equities struggled more clearly, with Europe’s STOXX 600 down -0.85% (-1.48% Friday), whilst Japan’s Nikkei fell -2.08% (-1.99% Friday). Meanwhile, US credit saw a mixed performance, with US IG spreads (-4bps) tightening but HY spreads (+1bps) marginally wider, whilst Euro IG (-2bps) and HY spreads (-14bps) both moved lower.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:42

EPA Unwinds Massive Biden-Era Auto Emissions Regulations That Had 2027 Deadline

Zero Hedge -

EPA Unwinds Massive Biden-Era Auto Emissions Regulations That Had 2027 Deadline

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times (Emphasis ours),

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a deregulatory action to delay compliance deadlines for Biden-era emission standards, in a bid to make vehicles more affordable for Americans while ensuring greater consumer choice, the agency said in a May 14 statement.

Ford Motor Company's electric F-150 Lightning on the production line at their Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn, Mich., on Sept. 8, 2022. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images

In March 2024, the Biden-administered EPA issued new rules regarding tailpipe emissions applicable to light-duty and medium-duty vehicles for model years 2027 and beyond. The regulations sought to “significantly reduce” greenhouse gas emissions, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and hydrocarbons from new light trucks, passenger cars, and larger pickups and vans.

The changes were projected to help tackle what the Biden-era EPA called “climate crisis” and reduce air pollution after the agency set limits on gas emissions. For instance, in passenger cars, the greenhouse gas emission limit was set at 139 grams of carbon dioxide per mile, which should reduce to 73 grams by 2032.

These regulations were expected to bring down carbon dioxide emissions by 7.2 billion tons through 2055, with the EPA saying there would be almost $100 billion in annual net benefits to American citizens, including $62 billion in lower fuel costs and maintenance costs, and $13 billion in public health benefits due to better air quality.

At the time, the EPA said that the emission standards were expected to “accelerate the transition to clean vehicle technologies.”

Between model years 2030–2032, around 30–56 percent of new light-duty vehicles and roughly 20–32 percent of new medium-duty vehicles were projected to be battery-electric vehicles, the document said.

In its May 14 statement, EPA said it was proposing to delay the compliance deadlines for these standards by two more years, until the beginning of model year (MY) 2029, since U.S. citizens have “overwhelmingly rejected” electric vehicles. Moreover, auto manufacturers have lost billions of dollars investing in the production of these vehicles, the agency stated.

The emission standards were “based on faulty assumptions by the Biden Administration that EVs would make up a significant percentage of MY 2027 and beyond fleets, causing the administration to set unrealistic emission standards for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles,” the EPA said.

If the proposal is finalized, it would allow auto companies to continue complying with current standards that “deliver substantial emissions reductions of up to 80 percent, for MY 2027 and MY 2028 vehicles,” according to the agency.

This would allow manufacturers to phase in the new emission standards starting with MY 2029 vehicles, “that better fit consumer demand for fewer EVs.”

The EPA said its proposal is estimated to save $1.7 billion, providing American families with hundreds of dollars in savings per vehicle.

“Freedom is the foundation of this nation, and this includes the freedom to choose the car you drive. The American people have been very clear; they do not want EVs forced upon them,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said.

“This proposal aims to return EPA regulations to reality, restoring consumer choice, protecting good-paying American jobs, and strengthening the nation’s global competitiveness” while the agency works to reconsider the emission standards, he said.

Ending EV Investments

In a May 15 statement, consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen criticized the EPA decision, saying that the agency’s proposal will allow automakers to sell polluting cars.

“The decision will not just cost lives; it will cost working-class people more money in medical bills, more missed days of work, and more years chained to volatile gas prices,” said Deanna Noel, deputy director with the organization’s Climate Program.

Working families are already stretched thin. Everything from groceries to home insurance to gas is getting more expensive, with no end in sight. Delaying commonsense emissions standards will only make communities sicker and send costs higher.”

In its recent statement, the EPA said that major auto manufacturers were already cutting down their electric vehicle fleets and related developments.

For instance, in January, General Motors announced a $6 billion write-down on its electric line. The company also canceled contracts with EV battery suppliers. Stellantis said it would cut its entire plug-in EV lineup for this year.

In December, Ford announced the cancellation of its flagship electric truck, the F-150 Lightning, after losing around $13 billion on its electric vehicle line since 2023.

The corporate decisions were taken after President Donald Trump ended a $7,500 tax credit for the purchase of electric vehicles in September, which had affected sales of these vehicles.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, which immediately followed the end of the tax credit, EVs made up only 5.8 percent of new cars sold in the United States, down from 10.5 percent in the third quarter, according to data from vehicle valuation company Kelley Blue Book.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:20

Samsung, Union Resume Talks After Labor Action Scare; Goldman Says "Korea: Buy"

Zero Hedge -

Samsung, Union Resume Talks After Labor Action Scare; Goldman Says "Korea: Buy"

Downward momentum in South Korean stocks was halted on Monday as optimism returned to Samsung Electronics after the company and its union reopened talks to resolve contract disputes and avert a strike that could begin as soon as Thursday.

Bloomberg reported that the union's leader would "sincerely engage" with Samsung executives. The world's most important memory chip maker was also granted several requests by a Korean court, including orders to block the union from occupying company facilities.

The union is still threatening an 18-day walkout beginning Thursday unless its contract demands are met, but both sides signaled earlier today a willingness to resolve the labor dispute.

On Saturday, Samsung also made a concession by replacing its lead negotiator, while Prime Minister Kim Min-seok and Chairman Jay Y. Lee publicly urged compromise.

Shares of Samsung in South Korea closed up 3.5%, helping lift the country's main equity index, KOSPI, after it had slid late last week on labor action fears.

Goldman analyst Christy Park told clients, "By now, one would know: any correction on Hynix & Samsung = Buy (*note Hynix shares corrected >1% only 5x times since April out of 30+ sessions in which at ALL times regained more than its losses immediately within the following 1~3 days)."

Park listed the catalysts for Samsung & Hynix:

  • Resolution to the labor union strike removing overhang (Samsung; co replaced its entire negotiation team)

  • Continued conventional memory pricing strength acting as a tailwind (Samsung has higher exposure vs. Hynix) 2027 HBM pricing upside given HBM now sold at a discount vs. conventional DRAM (both Samsung & Hynix)

  • Upside in shareholder return given the substantial growth in FCF (Samsung: 2024-2026 shareholder return policy of paying back 50% of this)

  • Potential ADR listing of Kioxia could be positive for Hynix sentiment (as Hynix owns a meaningful stake in Kioxia through a consortium) ADR listing of SK HYNIX (anticipated in July)

  • We see Agentic AI driving a 24x jump in token consumption by 2030 (120 quadrillion tokens per month) (both Samsung & Hynix)

In a separate note, Tom Kang, director at Counterpoint Research, said, "There is a clear need for both sides to reach an agreement," adding that both sides have relatively little experience because Samsung has historically lacked a strong union culture.

"The gap may seem large, but the issues are workable," Kang said. "I believe the differences can be resolved without a strike."

Taiwan-based market intelligence and research firm TrendForce pointed out:

Samsung's strike is set to formally begin on May 21. Because the company's semiconductor fabs are already highly automated, the impact on production is expected to be limited.

However, there will likely be noticeable disruptions to packaging and logistics, R&D and design, and customer relations. In terms of unionization, about half of all employees across the Samsung Group are union members, most of whom work in the semiconductor division. Internally, management has already extended an olive branch to the DRAM division, but has not yet reached an agreement with union members in the Foundry and LSI divisions.

Professional subscribers can read the full "[GS] KOREA: Buy" here at our new Marketdesk.ai portal. 

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 06:55

10 Monday AM Reads

The Big Picture -

My back-to-work morning train WFH reads:

Trump’s More Than 3,700 Trades Astonish Wall Street Insiders: President Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosures show that he or his investment advisers made more than 3,700 trades in the first quarter, a flurry totaling tens of millions of dollars and involving major companies that have dealings with his administration. The President’s personal trading record, surfaced in disclosures, is itself a market-integrity story. Even by political-class standards, the activity level is remarkable. (Bloomberg/Yahoo Finance)

Who wins and who loses from fewer corporate earnings reports:. Investors “have come to expect quarterly reporting and will exert pressure on companies to continue to provide quarterly reporting,” Erik Gerding, former director of corporate finance at the SEC. (Axios) see also Good Quarterly Earnings Behavior: Yours truly on what to actually do — and not do — during earnings season. Process beats prediction, every quarter. (The Big Picture)

Secret Memos, Frantic Texts and Juicy Confessions From the OpenAI-Musk Trial: We sifted through evidence and testimony to figure out how billionaires Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman ended up in a courtroom. (Wall Street Journal)

50 Years of Stock Market Returns: Ben Carlson’s annual long-view table. Useful as a sanity check the next time someone tells you ‘this time it’s different.’ (A Wealth of Common Sense)

The Rich Really Do Pay Lower Taxes Than You: The Saez/Zucman interactive still hits. Refreshed in the head whenever the ‘lazy rich aren’t taxed enough’ debate fires up again. (New York Times)

Apple Is Making Hit Products and High Profits From Imperfect Chips: The company’s popular, $599 Neo laptop is just one of dozens of Apple devices that use lower-performing processors. (Wall Street Journal)

The man they call Toad, and his lifetime collection of bikes that no-one wanted: A specialist’s lifetime collection, lovingly profiled. Almost everything about why hobbies matter is in this piece. The man they call Toad, and his lifetime collection of bikes that no-one wanted.  (The Bike Shed Times)

In northern Ukraine, it was boy vs. Russian drone. The boy won. A soldier taught a 12-year-old how to disable the fiber-optic drones that Russia has been using to hunt Ukrainian civilians in a campaign the U.N. has labeled a war crime. The ‘human safari’ phenomenon — Russian FPV drones hunting civilians on Ukrainian roads — has produced terrible footage and the occasional small victory. (Washington Post) see also Rumors of Instability in Moscow: Drone attacks, internet blackouts, and a sudden downturn in the economy have marked one of the worst stretches for Vladimir Putin since the start of the war in Ukraine. Kremlinology for the post-Wagner era. Reading the signals takes practice; this piece offers a useful framework. (New Yorker)

YouTube taught a Japanese teen how to kick field goals. Now he’s in the NFL. Kansei Matsuzawa, 27, became the first Japanese-born player ever signed by an NFL team when he agreed to a deal as an undrafted free agent with the Raiders. A lovely ‘distance learning, applied’ story. Specialist positions are the most disrupt-able corner of pro sports. (NBC News)

Stephen Colbert’s ‘Late Show’ comes to an ironic end: On the strange off-ramp for the late-night format. The economics killed the show; the politics gave the eulogy a louder coda. (Washington Post)

Video of the day: 7 Heritage Brands DESTROYED By Private Equity (And 5 That Survived)

Be sure to check out our Masters in Business this weekend with Sheila Bair, former Chairperson of FDIC from 2006-11. She helped steer the agency through worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Her new book is aimed at young adults and teenagers, titled “How Not to Lose a Million Dollars

 

In Credit Markets, Things Are Getting Better, Not Worse

Source: Apollo

 

Sign up for our reads-only mailing list here.

 

The post 10 Monday AM Reads appeared first on The Big Picture.

Canada Rethinks Selling Its Crown Jewel Pipeline

Zero Hedge -

Canada Rethinks Selling Its Crown Jewel Pipeline

Authored by Charles Kennedy via OilPrice.com,

  • The Canadian federal government may reconsider a plan to privatize the Trans Mountain oil pipeline.

  • Since the expanded TMX pipeline launched in 2024, exports to Asia—especially China—have surged, with up to 70% of shipments from British Columbia heading to Asian buyers by late 2025.

  • Officials now see TMX as a highly profitable “strategically important asset,” with potential for further expansion

The Canadian federal government may reconsider a plan to privatize the Trans Mountain oil pipeline and keep it state-owned amid a surge in appetite for Canadian crude to replace lost Middle Eastern barrels.

“The prior narrative had been that this should be returning to private hands,” the head of the government entity that owns Trans Mountain said at an event this week, as quoted by the Financial Post.

“That was in a different market and that was in a different time,” Elizabeth Wademan also said.

Indeed, this is a very different market from what it was when the government in Ottawa had to step in and buy Trans Mountain from Kinder Morgan, which quit the project under relentless pressure from climate activists who used environmental regulations to strangle the expansion project. The price tag for the nationalization deal, which took place in 2018, was about $3.3 billion, and the Trudeau government quickly signaled it would start looking for buyers as soon as possible.

By 2024, the cost of the pipeline expansion project had swelled to about $23 billion, but the project, somewhat surprisingly, was completed, and the expanded pipeline launched in May of that year, running at three times its original capacity or a total of 890,000 barrels daily.

The destination for these barrels was the vast Asian market, as a way to diversify away from the U.S., which has for decades been pretty much the only foreign market for Canadian crude—and an export conduit, with the oil transported from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast, and from there, to markets overseas. With the new TMX, Canadian crude producers got a new, more convenient channel to Asian energy buyers.

It did not take long for the effect to be felt: between the launch of the expanded pipe and spring 2025, the average flow rates for shipment to China reached 207,000 barrels daily. That compares with an average of 173,000 barrels daily pumped to the United States. Since spring, the shift has become even more marked. By October 2025, as much as 70% of Canadian crude exported from the British Columbia coast was going to China. Now, everyone else in Asia is also interested.

The Trans Mountain pipeline is a “strategically important asset”, Trans Mountain Corp.’s Wademan said this week, suggesting the project could be expanded further, with more “energy corridors” that would add value for Canadians, the Financial Post reported.

“Let’s look where we are, and look how important energy security is, and look how incredibly profitable this asset is; there’s a lot,” Wademan said.

“There’s a lot of merit to holding onto it and realizing that full value.”

Indeed, it would be profitable for the federal government to hold on to the infrastructure as the price of Canadian crude inches closer to $90 per barrel—a level hardly seen as possible just five years ago, and even more recently. TMX has turned into a game-changer for the Canadian oil industry and it will be in the center of the “golden opportunity” that Canada has to become a bigger global player in both oil and gas.

Canada has a “golden opportunity” to become a major global oil player as the war in the Middle East limits sources of crude and natural gas, the head of the International Energy Agency, Fatih Birol, said earlier this month, adding that “The cost of missing this train will be incredible.” It seems the Canadian government is acutely aware of that risk and plans to avoid it and make the best of the country’s resources in a fascinating departure from the previous government’s focus on emission reduction and alternative energy.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 06:30

Behind Turkey's Gold Sales: The Biggest Ever Plunge In Foreign Reserves

Zero Hedge -

Behind Turkey's Gold Sales: The Biggest Ever Plunge In Foreign Reserves

Shortly after the Iran war started, with gold unexpectedly tumbling, we showed that the reason behind gold's paradoxical move - after all, the precious metal has traditionally been a store of value in times of geopolitical stress - was the furious liquidation of gold by emerging markets, in this case Turkey, scrambling to obtain reserve dry powder so Ankara could cover soaring costs of energy imports.

And indeed, the latest central bank data showed that Turkey’s foreign reserves had their biggest monthly decline on record in March, as the Iran war triggered global selloffs in emerging market assets and strained the lira.

According to balance-of-payments data released on Wednesday, Turkey's official reserves cratered by $43.4 billion in March. Part of the decline reflected state intervention to offset portfolio outflows. The current-account deficit, meanwhile, widened to $9.7 billion in March from $7.3 billion in February as a result of soaring commodity prices.

A major energy importer, Turkey has been hit hard by higher oil and gas prices caused by the effective closing of the Strait of Hormuz and the resulting disruptions to world supplies of crude and refined products. Meanwhile, global banks have started changing their formerly favorable outlook on the lira, citing the exploding current-account deficit. Should inflation pressures persist, Turkey will have no choice but to pursue another accelerated devaluation of the Turkish lira. 

“As international institutions continue to raise their average oil price forecasts for 2026, disruptions in supply chains and ongoing regional tensions — and their potential negative impact on transportation and tourism revenues — keep upward risks alive in year-end projections” for Turkey, said Istanbul-based economist Haluk Burumcekci.

Turkish central bank Governor Fatih Karahan said last week that the ratio between the current-account deficit and gross domestic product would be “below historical averages” this year while acknowledging the upside risks.

Since President Erdogan’s reelection in 2023, a new economic team has sought to stabilize Turkey’s external finances by cooling demand through conventional tools such as higher interest rates and restrictions on credit growth.

The central bank has kept its benchmark rate at 37% for two straight meetings but has effectively lended from a costlier rate of 40% since the outbreak of the Iran war — a technical measure to tighten liquidity without instituting a formal rate hike.

Inflationary pressures persist, however, with annual price growth picking up to 32.4% in April, a number that is set to rise higher in the coming months. 

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 05:45

Trump Tells Iran 'Clock Is Ticking, Move Fast' After New Peace Proposal As Analysts Predict Likely Return To War

Zero Hedge -

Trump Tells Iran 'Clock Is Ticking, Move Fast' After New Peace Proposal As Analysts Predict Likely Return To War

Update(1410ET): President Trump has warned Iran on Sunday that the "clock is ticking" as Pakistani-mediated talks have not only stalled, but show no signs at all of restarting anytime soon. "They better get moving, FAST, or there won't be anything left of them," he wrote on Truth Social. "TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!"

He spoke the same day with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who along with Lindsey Graham has been calling for resumption of robust anti-Tehran action to ensure Iran can never go nuclear. Trump's words have been somewhat of a familiar refrain going back several weeks. 

As we detailed below, Iran says it received a counter proposal of '5 conditions' for peace from the White House. In many ways they are directly opposite the 5 conditions Iran sent to the US last week, which Trump had rejected as "garbage".

But as yet there's been no indicator that the US side has attached a timeline to its latest demands. Trump is perhaps pushing this new "clock is ticking" as a timeline threat of sorts. But again, there was no specific date included in the fresh warning.

Last week Bloomberg Intelligence circulated a report titled, Iran Rejects Trump's Offer - Return to War Likely. It concluded:

The diplomatic dance continues: the US and Iran exchanged offers yet again. But they remain far apart, shooting maximalist demands at each other. A comprehensive peace deal is unlikely to materialize. We think the US and Iran will likely return to strikes. But we expect an intense exchange of fire to be temporary and reduce to lower-levels of fighting – what we call the new normal in this protracted conflict. 

More from the Bloomberg Intelligence analysis: 

Short but Intense... and Costly

Trump doesn’t want long war. His popularity is taking a hit as its economic impact is being felt.

We think Trump will likely revert to a short air and missile strike campaign on Iranian infrastructure, military positions, and energy assets while simultaneously continuing the blockade. Tehran will likely respond with strikes of its own, both on US military assets and America’s regional partners. But we expect this to be a short bombardment, rather than the sustained, high-intensity strike campaign that marked the beginning of the war.

The war has already imposed a heavy economic cost. Oil markets flipped from an expected record surplus to historic supply disruption. Major central banks, facing fresh inflation risks, are turning more hawkish. Consumers now pay more for energy, while their borrowing costs also rise, and the future grows more uncertain.

The longer the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, the more it will drain the oil stockpiles cushioning governments, companies, and consumers today. Once inventories run thin, prices need to do the hard work: rising high enough to curb demand back in line with available supply.

Since that report was issued, nothing has changed, and both sides seem to have dug in their heels even more.

*  *  *

According to a Sunday report from Iran's semi-official Fars news agency, the United States has laid down a firm, take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum to Tehran. Both sides are still trying to patiently wait out the Hormuz crisis, hoping to inflict more economic pain on the other until they blink.

At the top of the list, the US is demanding a near-total dismantling of Iran's atomic ambitions, "allowing only one Iranian nuclear facility to remain operational." 

Anadolu Agency

The list includes direct rejections in response to Iran's own five conditions from a week ago, which President Trump said were "unacceptable" and "garbage".

For example the US is refusing to pay compensation for damage caused during strikes on Iranian territory - a 'maximalist' sticking point which Tehran had demanded previously.

Washington is also reportedly insists that 400 kilograms of enriched uranium be transferred from Iran to the US, while only one active nuclear facility would remain operational inside the Islamic Republic.

Iran for its part has recently vowed to never transfer its nuclear material out of the Islamic Republic, calling the issue a matter of national sovereignty and energy security which it alone has say over. This after even Russia offered to take it.

The newly reported five conditions by the US side further states that the US does not intend to release more than 25% of frozen Iranian assets. Tehran has demanded the dropping of all US sanctions as a key basis for lasting settlement.

Here are the five newly proposed Washington conditions, which some pundits have called 'wishful thinking':

  1. No war compensation from US
  2. Give up 400kg of Highly Enriched Uranium to US 
  3. Iran can only have on nuclear facility to remain active
  4. Not more than 25% of frozen assets to be unfreezed 
  5. Halting war on all fronts depends on negotiations

So this leaves a huge distance between the Washington list and Tehran's list, as the seemingly unbridgeable gulf remains, also as Iran is digging in its heels.

As a reminder, the below is the Islamic Republic's list, which it hasn't backed down from. It has offered the following as the only basis on which to restart talks:

  1. Ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon
  2. Lifting all sanctions
  3. Releasing frozen Iranian assets
  4. Compensation for war damages and losses
  5. Recognition of Iran’s sovereign rights over the Strait of Hormuz

While a Pakistani-mediated ceasefire managed to take effect on April 8, subsequent talks in Islamabad completely collapsed, but then President Trump later extended the truce indefinitely, likely to buy time and to figure out "what's next" - while seeking a complete blockade of Iranian oil exports, and of all vessels entering or exiting Iranian ports.

With Washington demanding total disarmament and Iran demanding control over the world's most critical oil transit choke point, the stage is set for a likely coming renewal of direct clashes, given the zero sum demands of each side now on the table.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 05:10

So Where Does Wokeism Come From? (Spoiler Alert: The French, Of Course!)

Zero Hedge -

So Where Does Wokeism Come From? (Spoiler Alert: The French, Of Course!)

Authored by Monica Showalter via AmericanThinker.org,

How did wokeism happen?

A French intellectual, who goes by Brivael Le Pogam on X, has written a tightly focused and brief explanation of it worthy of Eric Hoffer, putting his finger on the thinking of French philospher-historian Michel Foucault, French philosopher Jacques Derrida, and French philospher-literary critic Gilles Deleuze, the first of whom claimed there was  no such thing as truth, just power relationships, the second of whom claimed truth was malleable, and the third of whom made the really weird claim that seeds were greater than fully developed trees because becoming was more important than being, poor romantic devil.

Married to guilt-tripping academics of the U.S., he explains how wokery was the result.

His tweet is in French, but Grok translate kicks in on my site, so I will post the translation below the tweet.

Grok translate, (with censorship from me of one cuss word that means merde): (emphasis ours)

I want to offer my apologies, on behalf of the French, for giving birth to French Theory (which in turn gave birth to the worst of all ideological monstrosities: wokism).

We gave the world Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. And then, in the intellectual ruins of post-1968, we gave Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Three brilliant men who forged, in the elegance of our language, the ideological weapon that today paralyzes the West.

We must understand what they did.

Foucault taught that truth does not exist, that there are only power relations disguised as knowledge. That science, reason, justice, the medical institution, the school, the prison, sexuality—everything is merely a staging of domination.

Derrida taught that texts have no stable meaning, that every signifier slips away, that every reading is a betrayal, that the author is dead and the reader reigns supreme.

Deleuze taught that we should prefer the rhizome to the tree, the nomad to the sedentary, desire to the law, becoming to being, difference to identity.

Taken individually, these are debatable theses. Combined, exported, and popularized, they form a system. And that system is a poison.

For here’s what happened.

These texts, unreadable in France, crossed the Atlantic. The departments of Yale, Berkeley, and Columbia absorbed them in the 1980s. They found there a soil that did not exist among us: American Puritanism, its racial guilt, its obsession with identity. French Theory married this substratum, and the child of that union is called wokism.

Judith Butler reads Foucault and invents performative gender. Edward Said reads Foucault and invents academic postcolonialism. Kimberlé Crenshaw inherits the framework and invents intersectionality. At every step, the matrix is French: there is no truth, there is only power, so every hierarchy is suspect, every institution is oppressive, every norm is violence, every identity is constructed and thus negotiable, every majority is guilty.

That’s how three Parisian philosophers, who probably never imagined their practical consequences, provided the operating software to an entire generation of activists, university bureaucrats, HR managers, journalists, and legislators. That’s how we ended up with a civilization that no longer knows how to say whether a woman is a woman, whether its own history is worth defending, whether merit exists, whether truth can be distinguished from opinion.

It’s sh** for one simple reason, and it must be stated calmly.

A civilization stands on three pillars: the belief that there exists a truth accessible to reason, the belief that there exists a good distinct from evil, the belief that there exists a heritage to be transmitted.

French Theory set out to dynamite all three. Not out of malice. Out of intellectual play, fascination with suspicion, hatred of the bourgeoisie that had nurtured them. But the result is there. An entire generation learned to deconstruct and never learned to build. An entire generation knows how to suspect and no longer knows how to admire. An entire generation sees power everywhere and beauty nowhere.

I apologize because we French bear a particular responsibility. It’s our language, our universities, our publishers, our prestige that gave this nihilism its chic packaging. Without the legitimacy of the Sorbonne and Vincennes, these ideas would never have crossed the ocean. We exported doubt the way others export weapons.

What is being built now, in Silicon Valley, in AI labs, in startups, in workshops, in all the places where people still make things instead of deconstructing them—that is the response. A civilization is rebuilt by builders, not by commentators. By those who believe that truth exists and is worth devoting oneself to. By those who embrace a hierarchy of the beautiful, the true, the good, and are not ashamed to transmit it.

So, forgive us. And back to work.

His viral tweet has been retweeted by Elon Musk, Javier Milei, and 20,000 other people on X, multiplied many more times by Musk and others. 

Eric Hoffer used to write about these guys in the '50s and '60s, the earlier wave of them, French and German intellectuals, plus numerous academics in the states, often noting that they have never having done a day of work in their lives. He linked their relativist and nihilist radicalism to antisemitism, too. Hoffer knew who they were and he  had their number.

So does this guy.

His tweet advances to the recent wave of them, which created an unholy fusion with U.S. academics to produce wokesterism, the reason we see in our culture the inability to define what a woman is, the collective racism charge that never, ever can be ended, and more rubbish that a whole industry has been built around.

Eric Hoffer, who died in 1983, loved those who could express ideas concisely. Since I knew him personally as a high school and college student, I think he would have enjoyed X.

I hope we hear more from this French guy, because knowledge of this kind is power -- that is why this tweet went viral. It's why, when I first discovered Eric Hoffer's True Believer book as a 12-year-old kid, I hid the book under my bed, because to a kid like me, it felt like it contained all the secrets of the universe. Hoffer has never been out of print, because what he tells is the truth. Truth like this French tweet is the same kind of truth, and the gives me the same kind of feeling: Exposes the liars is the strongest way to stamp the wokeism out. It's a reminder that Western Civilization must win this war on ideas.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 05:00

Net Zero Fearmongering In Tatters After Climate Report 'Implausibility' Ruling

Zero Hedge -

Net Zero Fearmongering In Tatters After Climate Report 'Implausibility' Ruling

Authored by Chris Morrison via DailySceptic.org,

The fallout from the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ruling that computer model high emissions pathway RCP8.5 is “implausible” is only just beginning. Most mainstream media fearmongering stories over the last 15 years need to be moved into the junk file, as do the increasingly shrill sandwich-board pronouncements of King Charles and Sir David Attenborough.

But the rot goes much deeper than ill-informed public comment, although that alone has been enormously influential in promoting the Net Zero fantasy. Activist-ridden science bodies such as the UK Met Office have brazenly used RCP8.5 to flam up weather predictions which in turn has led to onerous requirements being placed on British industry and finance. Politicians have been convinced by patently ridiculous claims and Net Zero rules and regulations have cascaded through the economy and society.

All the politicised predictions need to be junked and all the resulting regulations reconsidered with a view to abolition. They are all based on assumptions that many at the time said were ridiculous and have now been officially marked as not wanted on voyage. Those inclined to be uncharitable might suggest it was all a hoax from start to finish.

In 2022, the Met Office published its latest ‘UK Climate Projections Report‘ (UKCP18) and claimed it provided users “with the most recent scientific evidence on projected climate change with which to plan”. Many words come to mind to describe the output of computer models, none of which include ‘evidence’. In fact, the Met Office made a feature of its deliberate use of RCP8.5, highlighting its findings in bold type and describing them as “plausible”. These plausible projections, a more accurate description might be laughable, suggested summers and winters in the UK by 2070 could be up to 5.1°C and 3.8°C warmer respectively. More bold claims suggested summer rainfall could decrease by up to 45%, with winter precipitation increasing by 39%. Severe droughts and floods would inevitably follow.

The Met Office concludes: “Governments will make use of UKCP18 to inform its adaption and mitigation planning and decision-making.” Unfortunately, they probably did.

The science writer Roger Pielke Jr. was the first to spot the IPCC’s rejection of RCP8.5, calling it “the most significant development in climate research in decades”. He said that the scenario described “impossible futures”, although the results have dominated climate research, headlines and policy for the best part of two decades. Helped also by the reporting in the Daily Sceptic which went viral across social media, the IPCC finding is firmly established in the public domain. But, notes Pielke, remarkably there has not been a peep from major US or international English language mainstream media outlets.

The New York Times is said to be perhaps the most prominent home for promoting news stories based on studies that rely on RCP8.5. It has said nothing, likewise the BBC and the Guardian. Green Blob-funded Climate Brief has covered RCP8.5 more than perhaps any other English language publication, but again silence reigns. Pielke is led to observe: “The outlets most invested in their longstanding promotion of RCP8.5 have the most to lose from a clear-eyed accounting of what its retirement means for science, policy and their own coverage.”

Nevertheless, there have been some rare sightings of mainstream coverage. The Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant published a front page story headed ‘UN Climate Panel Drops Doomsday Scenario’. The writer of the story Maarten Keulemans later posted on X:

Also in Europe, the Berliner Zeitung ran an article suggesting that “extreme climate scenarios played too large a role in public debate for too long”. Another German publication Die Welt also picked up the story, observing: “A lobby made RCP8.5 famous: the most sensationalist of all climate scenarios has determined scientific studies, media and politics – yet it is unrealistic. Now it is actually being phased out”.

Two members of that ‘lobby’ are the main science publications Nature and Science. In recent years it has sometimes been suggested that climate scientists have moved on from RCP8.5 but the evidence suggests the popular climate crackpipe is difficult to put down. Pielke notes that so far in 2026, more than 2,600 studies have been published using the high emission scenarios, and tens of thousands before that. Both Nature and Science have thrived on publishing RCP8.5 drivel – it will be interesting to see how they spin the passing of an attention-seeking, grant-manufacturing old friend.

The implications of RCP8.5’s demise are vast. Science and journalism careers will be affected, trust in another branch of politicised science will be diminished, rules and regulations imposing unnecessary financial climate costs will need to be re-written (don’t hold your breath), while the promoters of Net Zero will lose a vital fearmongering weapon propping up their Great Reset fantasy. Watch this space.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 03:30

Japanese Company Simplifies Ketchup Packaging Amid Ink Shortage Tied To Middle East Conflict

Zero Hedge -

Japanese Company Simplifies Ketchup Packaging Amid Ink Shortage Tied To Middle East Conflict

Kagome is revamping the packaging of several ketchup products after supply disruptions made white printing ink harder to source, according to Japan Today. The shortage stems from raw material constraints tied to the conflict in the Middle East.

Under the redesign, bottles of Kagome Tomato Ketchup will no longer feature the brand’s usual full white-and-red label. Instead, part of the bottle will be left clear, creating a more minimal look. Kagome said switching to a different ink is not a practical option because of technical printing limitations.

Japan Today writes that the updated packaging will be introduced gradually later this month for 500-gram, 300-gram, and 180-gram bottles.

The change reflects broader supply strain across Japan’s food industry. Earlier this week, Calbee Inc. said it would temporarily sell 14 potato chip varieties in monochrome packaging as shortages of naphtha — a petroleum-based material used in production — continue to disrupt operations.

Calbee’s affected products include popular flavors such as Lightly Salted, Consomme Punch, and Seaweed Salt. The company also said it will raise prices on 25 snack items starting Sept. 1, including potato chips and Jagarico. Chip prices are set to increase by 5% to 10%, while Jagarico products will rise by 3% to 10%.

The back-to-back announcements highlight how geopolitical tensions are rippling into everyday consumer goods, affecting everything from packaging materials to retail prices. For shoppers, the most visible impact may be simpler packaging now — and higher grocery bills later.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 02:45

Poland Is Now The Last Country Standing In The Way Of A Federalized Europe

Zero Hedge -

Poland Is Now The Last Country Standing In The Way Of A Federalized Europe

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Its conservative president is totally against this project and can veto related legislation tabled by the liberal prime minister since the latter’s ruling coalition doesn’t have the two-thirds majority to overrule him, thus enabling Poland to play the role that Hungary did prior to Orban’s downfall.

Politico earlier reported that “European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen waited less than a day after Hungary voted Viktor Orbán out of office to call for the EU to get more power over national governments to force through foreign policy decisions.” In particular, she wants qualified majority voting on foreign policy matters whereby at least 55% of member states vote in favor and they represent at least 65% of the EU’s population, which hasn’t yet happened in order to safeguard state sovereignty.

Spanish journalist and analyst Javier Villamor published a piece at The European Conservative that same day about how “Hungary’s Fall Clears Path for a More Centralized EU”.

In brief, “The removal of Brussels’ most persistent opponent is set to accelerate plans to curb national vetoes, expand EU borrowing, and tighten control over member states.” The combined effect would amount to furthering the plan to federalize Europe in alignment with what the EU elites have wanted for some time already.

Von der Leyen’s plan in summer 2024 to “build a veritable union of defenseas well as Germany’s “two-speed Europe” proposal earlier this year and the proposal to fast-track Ukraine’s EU membership are all complementary means to this end that’ll now be easier to implement after Orban’s downfall. If progress is made on any of what was mentioned thus far, then states will lose even more sovereignty than they already have, and this could have disastrous implications for their national identity and social cohesion.

Many of the EU elites pushing this agenda are German, which is why Polish opposition leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski said before the election that Orban’s win would help prevent the EU from becoming a tool for “German neo-imperialism”. He also accused Germany in late 2021 of building a “Fourth Reich” through the EU. Polish President Karol Nawrocki, who’s an independent in alliance with Kaczynski’s conservatives, alluded last December to this significant non-military threat that the German-led EU poses to Poland.

One month prior, he shared his “vision of the direction in which the European Union should go”, which advocates reforming the bloc in order to restore states’ sovereignty, while last month he presented Poland and implicitly himself personally at CPAC as Europe’s conservative champions. With all this in mind, Poland is now the last country standing in the way of a federalized Europe since Nawrocki can veto related legislation and the ruling liberals don’t have the two-thirds majority to overrule him.

The next parliamentary elections aren’t till fall 2027, and given how close they’re expected to be, liberal Prime Minister Tusk isn’t expected to risk the public’s wrath by tabling doomed-to-fail federalization-related legislation. Accordingly, von der Leyen and her ilk’s plot won’t prospectively make any progress despite Orban’s downfall due to these Polish domestic political reasons, and the conservatives’ potential retaking of parliament could then doom it for another four years after that.

In Christian eschatology, the katechon is the one who prevents the arrival of the anti-Christ, so a political comparison among critics of the EU would be the one who prevents the bloc’s federalization. That was Orban up until last year, but then this role was shared with Nawrocki and is now exclusively held by him, with their Czech and Slovak counterparts being considered too susceptible to EU pressure. This is a huge responsibility, an historic one in fact, and his legacy will be determined by whether he stands strong.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 02:00

A Deadly Day In Butler

Zero Hedge -

A Deadly Day In Butler

The following is an excerpt from the newly published book “The Trump Assassination Plots: What the Investigations Missed, and Why it Matters.” The book, which can be found here, attempts to provide the most complete account to date of the attempts on Donald Trump’s life (emphasis ours),

A Deadly Day in Butler

*CRACK* *CRACK* *CRACK*

Three shots rang throughout the Butler Farm Show - causing Trump to grab his ear and fall on the ground, his security detail piling on top of him moments later. Numerous rallygoers later said that they thought they were hearing fireworks at first, but there was a shooter on the AGR rooftop. His first three shots were aimed at Trump, but then he started spraying seemingly indiscriminately.

*CRACK* *CRACK* *CRACK* *CRACK* *CRACK*

As Crooks fired, Butler ESU operator Aaron Zaliponi, who was on the ground, could see his head peeking over the rooftop. Zaliponi had been one of the Butler ESU operators deployed seconds before Crooks started firing. When the shooting began, he was between Trump’s podium and the AGR building - by the fence that separated the Farm Show from the company’s property.

Keeping calm despite the bullets whizzing by, Zaliponi focused on Crooks through the EOTECH red-dot sight on his M4 AR platform SWAT rifle.

*CRACK*

Zaliponi returned fire with a single 5.56mm NATO 62 grain TAP Barrier projectile.

I can see the gas emit from his barrel, his muzzle. Then right after that I hear the snap of his fifth shot go off. Then immediately after that, I press one off, and that’s whenever he immediately goes down. When I say he goes down, it wasn’t like he was ducking to get out of the way. I mean, like, I know I hit him. Like there’s no doubt about it,” Zaliponi later recounted. “He goes down. He kind of jerks to the right, and then he kind of slumps over slowly and then kind of slowly rolls backwards out of my field of view.

For the next 10 seconds, the crowd seemed to be under a spell. Some in the stands ducked down, some turned toward the AGR building, and some looked with concern at Trump.

“What are we doing? What are we doing?” one of Trump’s security agents could be heard saying frantically.

At the bottom of a body-bunker of agents who piled onto Trump, the second-in-command of his detail could see that he was bleeding.

“Sir, are you okay?” said Nick Menster, the Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC).

“I think so,” Trump said.

Menster said that he used a white cloth that Trump had at the podium to apply pressure on his ear - the left one.

“No, it’s my right ear,” Trump corrected the agent.

Counter-Snipers in Disarray

On the barn rooftops behind Trump, the Secret Service counter-snipers were in similar disarray. Though they had reoriented their weapons toward the AGR building at 6:10 P.M. and were aware that local police were pursuing someone in that vicinity, they were still caught flat-footed when the shooting began.

A tree was blocking the northern barn counter-sniper team’s view of the rooftop gunman, and video shows them seemingly flinching at the first shots. One of them later told congressional investigators that he and his partner believed they took fire.

“I’m telling you, I could have reached out and smacked these projectiles out of the air with my hand. They were that close. I could feel the air, the pressure difference in my eardrum as these rounds passed,” said a Secret Service counter-sniper, who has not been publicly identified.

While the Secret Service counter-snipers were scrambling, Sgt. Zaliponi kept a watchful eye on the rooftop. He saw Crooks slowly crawl back up and into his sights. But just as the local cop was about to put another bullet into the would-be assassin, Secret Service counter-sniper David King fired a final, 10th shot — a .300 Winchester Magnum bullet. King’s shot, fired from the southern barn behind Trump, came 15 seconds after shooting began and 10 seconds after it had stopped.

*CRACK*

“I got him,” King said.

It’s unclear exactly how long King had the rooftop gunman in his sights.

According to notes King took immediately after the shooting, he saw Crooks “crawling” into position before firing.

I and my teammates positioned ourselves to observe that area that everyone was moving to. I noticed an individual, white male, white or gray shirt, low crawling on the roof. I noticed an AR-style weapon in his hands. As I moved to observe through my rifle scope I heard weapon fire,” King’s notes said.

“I looked up to see my engagement scope, looked back through the scope, observed the individual shooting, and engaged. At that time, the shooter dropped out of my sight in the scope. I continued to observe the area, as there were reports of another individual on the water tower at four o’clock,” his notes said.

However, King later told congressional investigators that he didn’t actually see Crooks crawling. In fact, he didn’t see Crooks until after he stopped firing, King said.

“I was observing the rooftops, didn’t see anything… When the first shot rang out, I identified the location that Crooks was at, put my binos down, got my rifle. At the time that I was getting into my rifle and getting the [view] of Crooks, that’s when I assumed that three rounds and then five went off,” King told House investigators.

King’s partner, team leader John Marciniak, claimed he didn’t see Crooks until he was dead.

Marciniak indicated that he was discombobulated after a bullet ruptured a hydraulic line on a nearby speaker tower, spraying him with fluid. At first, Marciniak thought that he was having a heat stroke. Another thought flashed through his head: “Am I seeing snow right now?”

Unlike his counterparts on the north barn, Marciniak and King didn’t think they were under fire — though Marciniak may have had second thoughts after speaking to federal investigators.

“At the time, I had no reason to believe shots were fired at us until speaking to the FBI… I guess a round — it was in the air, in our [general] direction, but not close to us.”

Excerpt from “The Trump Assassination Plots: What the Investigations Missed, and Why it Matters.”

Tyler Durden Sun, 05/17/2026 - 23:20

Are There Really 'No Bad Ideas' When It Comes To 'Saving Our Democracy'?

Zero Hedge -

Are There Really 'No Bad Ideas' When It Comes To 'Saving Our Democracy'?

Authored by Eric Utter via AmericanThinker.com,

Former Vice President Kamala (hic!) Harris recently opined that there are “no bad ideas” when it comes to brainstorming ways to reinvigorate the Democrat party.

During a May 13th livestream on something called the "Win with Black Women" podcast, Hic! Harris suggested that the Democrat party prepare an "expanded playbook" of ideas to help it retake power after the 2026 midterm elections.

Harris opined:

"And in that no bad ideas brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College. We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court. We invite a conversation about multi-member districts."

The old sot suggested that, when Democrats retake the Senate, the Senate Judiciary Committee should quickly establish rules to "penalize people for lying" for Supreme Court justices and nominees.

It is always hilarious when Democrats speak of their dislike for lying … and always lie.

They are to prevarication as Kamala is to drinking, as retrievers are to … retrieving things. They can’t help themselves.

The Tipsy One added,

“Let's talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and D.C. These are the things I think that we've got to do.”

She concluded by saying of Democrats:

"We gotta fight fire with fire. We gotta be ruthless, too."

Democrats start fires. (They don’t always put them out, as clearly demonstrated in Los Angeles County last year.) And Democrats have always been ruthless, whether they were plantation owners or, more recently, possessed by Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) and the rabid desire to dispense, by any means necessary, with those with whom they disagree.

As for the notion that there are no bad ideas? How about “Let’s kill all the Jews” or “Islam is totally compatible with a free, democratic republic?” Or even, “I’ve only had 10 rum and cokes, I think I’ll take a nice drive in my car?” And let’s be honest, Kamala doesn’t have brainstorms, she has perhaps a mild squall or minor dust-up on occasion, maybe even a moderate gust of wind, but no brainstorms.

So, Democrats, just continue to call conservatives Nazis. Keep trying to imprison all your political opponents. An assassination or two might be needed here and there to, you know, “save our democracy.” (The problem is that Democrats actually think the country is their democracy, and that no one else has a right to govern it.)

Kamala may still have her mind set on Running for President Under the Influence (RPUI), but it is hard to see any current likely Democrat heading a ticket the equal of Vance-Rubio or vice-versa. As sure as water is wet, Democrats will resort to their time-tested tactics of slander, libel, lies, gas-lighting, projection, and cheating.

Maybe they should just, hic!, forcibly take power via a good, old-fashioned insurrection?

Anything to save their our democracy, right? 

Tyler Durden Sun, 05/17/2026 - 22:10

By Targeting Dairy Farmers, ESG Wants To Decide Your Milk

Zero Hedge -

By Targeting Dairy Farmers, ESG Wants To Decide Your Milk

Authored by Samantha Fillmore via RealClearMarkets,

It starts with a letter in the mail.

A dairy farmer opens it to find new requirements from their milk processing plant.

Herd data, energy usage, emissions figures. The letter calls it voluntary but if you don't comply, the plant can't take your milk. And if the plant can't take your milk, you're out of business.

That's 'Pathways to Dairy Net Zero' in practice...

Pathways to Dairy Net Zero (P2DNZ) is presented as a voluntary, science-based initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy producers. In practice, however, it functions as yet another sector-specific implementation of global ESG and net-zero governance.

In the case of P2DNZ, this governance model is applied to large-scale milk producers. The result is the downward transfer of climate-compliance costs and onerous ESG restrictions on farmers. Especially mid-sized and small farms, while offering no plausible pathway to detectable global emissions reductions. In short, this is the latest attack on American farmers from globalist board rooms seeking to control what you consume.

P2DNZ may be presented as a voluntary, science-based initiative but in reality, it's the same ESG playbook we've seen used to squeeze entire industries into net-zero compliance without a single vote being cast. The pressure doesn't come from government. It comes from the giant food corporations at the top of the supply chain. It comes from the boardrooms of companies like Nestlé and Danone and filters down through processors until it lands on the farmer who has no real choice but to comply.

What begins as “guidance” quickly becomes obligation.

For dairy farmers, especially the ones that make up the lifeblood of the American Heartland, that obligation carries a heavy cost. P2DNZ effectively embeds climate compliance into the financial and commercial conduits of the industry. It deeply impacts how farmers access credit, who processes their milk, who buys their milk, and under what conditions they can continue operating. The burden doesn’t fall on distant institutions or multinational coalitions. It falls squarely on the people milking cows before sunrise, managing tight margins, and trying to pass their family farms on to the next generation.

And for what measurable gain?

Even under the most aggressive assumptions, eliminating all emissions from U.S. dairy production would have no detectable impact on global climate trends. That’s not a political statement; it’s a matter of scale. Yet the economic consequences are anything but theoretical. Farmers face rising compliance costs. Consumers face higher prices at the grocery store. And the industry itself faces increasing consolidation, as smaller producers struggle to keep up with mandates they had zero role in shaping.

This is the uncomfortable truth at the heart of P2DNZ: it is less about environmental outcomes and more about control. It’s about shifting decision-making power away from independent producers and toward a network of globalist financial and corporate actors.

The attacks on American agriculture have taken on many forms. From discriminating against the use of diesel- and gasoline-powered farming equipment in the lending market, to corporate shareholder resolutions calling on food companies to “reduce greenhouse gas emissions” by cutting beef production, to utter demands to adopt plant-based alternatives to actual meat, and even outright litigation designed to bankrupt American businesses and farmers. Regardless of the tactic, they share a common objective. To create a world in which every single human is under the thumb of a global set of rules that would ensure more pain and misery than anyone should entertain. 

The good news is that the current federal administration seems to be sticking up for small- and mid-sized American farms and dairy producers. Yesterday, the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, shared a post on X highlighting the Pathways to Dairy Net Zero Problem. “Dairy farmers are vital in rural America, but now face radical ESG mandates disguised as “sustainability.” As (@Heartland Impact) notes, Pathways to Dairy Net Zero will burden small farms with costly compliance.”

P2DNZ is not an isolated initiative. It is the agricultural, and diary centered, expression of a broader ESG governance model that substitutes accounting targets for physical outcomes and private coordination for public accountability.

Hopefully, in the months and years to follow, more Americans and policymakers will become aware of the harms associated with incorporating ESG metrics into farming. American famers feed the nation, and they deserve better.

Samantha Fillmore (sfillmore@heartland.org) is the senior state government relations manager at The Heartland Institute.

Tyler Durden Sun, 05/17/2026 - 21:00

Largest Ukrainian Drone Attack On Moscow In Over A Year Leaves Four Dead

Zero Hedge -

Largest Ukrainian Drone Attack On Moscow In Over A Year Leaves Four Dead

The Russian capital has just suffered possibly its single biggest and deadliest Ukrainian drone attack of the war - and certainly the largest attack wave on Moscow in the last year. It ironically comes exactly a week after President Zelensky signed on to a three day Russian 'Victory Day' ceasefire at the behest of President Trump. It also comes after several days of major Russian missile and drone attacks on Ukraine.

At least four people have been killed in the overnight large-scale assault wave, with dozens more wounded. Regional airports have been shut down, and there's been a sense of panic as the threat lingered into the daylight hours Sunday, with onlookers filming drones flying uncontested over Moscow airspace. 

via Telegram

"A woman died in Khimki, north of Moscow, and a person was trapped under rubble, regional governor Andrei Vorobiev said. A man and a woman were killed in the village of Pogorelki," BBC reports, citing local authorities.

Additionally, "A male Indian citizen was killed and three others injured, India's Moscow embassy said, but it was not clear whether these casualties were included in Vorobiev's tally. Another person died in Belgorod region bordering Ukraine."

The regional governor said that residences were on fire, with a home in the village of Subbotino, southwest of Moscow, being one of them. 

Reports say the attack marks the first time of the entire 4+ year long war that Ukraine directly struck a Moscow oil refinery, considered to be the most protected energy facility in the country, with multiple strikes landing on target.

Moment of attack on Moscow refinery:

Hours-long fire at the key refinery...

Some eyewitness accounts said at one point drones were seen flying in formation over Moscow, as if to make a mockery of Russian anti-air defense.

Ukraine's drone swarms have long proven a major problem for Russia's military, being small and low to the ground, able to evade expensive air defenses which were designed to intercept larger, faster inbound projectiles like rockets or aircraft.

Overnight, Russia's defense ministry said 556 drones were intercepted around the country. Some 130 of them were intercepted in the Moscow region alone, but clearly at least dozens still made it through.

Amid the suicide UAV attack mayhem, Sheremetyevo - Russia's busiest airport that serves Moscow - suffered drone damage and falling debris, but there were no reports of injury at the airport.

"The situation in the passenger terminals is calm. Sheremetyevo Airport is providing stable passenger and aircraft services," airport officials said.

There have also been dramatic scenes of massive fires just underneath busy highways, causing panicked drivers to try and get past the flames quickly and safely, and watching the skies above.

Damage at Sheremetyevo airport...

via X

Ukrainian President Zelensky later owned up to authorizing the attack, saying the strikes were an "entirely justified" response to the last several days of Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities, including Kiev. This past week saw massive Russian attacks, which killed seven bystanders and wounded many more, including children.

Rare moment of chaos and fear over Moscow...

The tit-for-tat drone hits have increasingly expanded to include civilian neighborhoods on either side of the border, sadly. The ground war has lately been largely stale-mated, with Russia having the clear edge, but the air war has been heating up - with both sides suffering serious damage, particularly at energy sites.

Tyler Durden Sun, 05/17/2026 - 15:45

Massive Mushroom Cloud 'Test' Blast Rattles Uninformed Residents Outside Jerusalem

Zero Hedge -

Massive Mushroom Cloud 'Test' Blast Rattles Uninformed Residents Outside Jerusalem

Late Saturday night, a massive explosion and a bright fireball illuminated the skies over Israel's Beit Shemesh, deeply rattling local residents and setting off rampant speculation in local media and online commentary. 

The area lies just 19 miles west of Jerusalem, close enough to be located within Jerusalem District. Curiously, the state-owned Tomer rocket propulsion defense ministry-linked firm subsequently sought clarify that the blast was actually a controlled, pre-planned test and that authorities were notified in advance.

However, community members have complained about receiving absolutely no warning, and were shocked at the immensity of the blast which lit up the night sky, visible for many miles.

Tensions were already running high in the city which had been struck multiple times by Iranian missiles during the recent war. The sudden detonation fueled widespread anxiety and anger among residents already on edge, bracing for the potential renew of the Iran war and thus Iranian ballistic missile attacks.

Times of Israel has cited Channel 12, saying that "the test involved propellants for rockets, including those with a range of thousands of kilometers."

The same report interestingly called it "apocalyptic" in appearance but suggested this was misleading:

On Sunday, Kan reported that in the wake of the panic caused by the blast, a meeting was held at Tomer during which it was decided, in coordination with the Defense Ministry, to warn the public ahead of similar tests.

Tomer sources told the broadcaster that due to operational needs, the company is conducting testing at all hours, including during the night.

According to Kan, the company recently hired dozens of new employees, and the test was scheduled at night due to production constraints. Sources said it was carried out five kilometers from any population areas and that weather conditions had made the blast appear more "apocalyptic" than it actually was.

But it was significant enough to result in the convening of Israeli emergency management and defense officials, who subsequently told the public an investigation would ensue. The Defense Ministry said in the aftermath that "the issue of advance warning to the public will be examined with the company."

The company in question, Tomer, also separately stated, "A routine and planned test was carried out, conducted according to plan and achieving all its objectives."

It explained: "All emergency forces were notified in advance, as is customary, and the fact that emergency and rescue forces were not called in attests to this. The videos filmed from a distance amplified the force of the explosion and did not reflect the fact that this was a routine event."

But longtime resident and Beit Shemesh City Council member David Gozlan shot back, "There were quarries here, there were explosions at the Hartuv quarries, there were quite a few things here - but we have never experienced anything like this."

The whole incident saw US 'security experts' quickly speculate and weigh in, and try and make sense of it on Sunday morning...

Naturally the biggest fear among locals was that a final big Iranian attack was underway, also given prior reports of hypersonic missiles launched on Israel during the height of the 38-day Operation Epic Fury bombing campaign on the Islamic Republic.

Israelis across the country spent many anxious and sleepless nights in bomb shelters and hundreds of Iranian projectiles rained down - many of them targeting defense industrial sites in the Israeli countryside.

Tyler Durden Sun, 05/17/2026 - 13:25

AI vs Affordability And Rates

Zero Hedge -

AI vs Affordability And Rates

By Peter Tchir of Academy Securities

Last week, we contemplated, for the first time, that we might need to Understand Universal Basic Income. The timing was very good as on Monday, South Korea floated the idea of transferring some AI-driven tax revenue to its citizens. As uncertainty around jobs, income, and costs continue to weigh on overall confidence, expect this subject to get more airtime in the political arena. The concept of UBI does go hand in hand with two competing themes: AI and Affordability.

China, Iran, and a Whole Lotta Nothing

Iran took a backseat to the Summit in China. We had relatively low expectations for the Summit. The cards were stacked somewhat in China’s favor as examined in China and Trade. It turns out that even our low expectations seemed to have set the bar too high. Friday’s title pretty much sums it up: My President Went to Beijing and all I got was this Crummy T-Shirt. There may yet be some deals announced, either with Iran or with China, but it looks like we are starting the week roughly where we started the prior week, but with even lower expectations.

The Oil Curve

While Brent crude is most impacted by the ongoing problems in the Middle East, we will stick with WTI because that is what affects Americans the most.

One of the talking points for the admin had been that the oil market was predicting a “quick” resolution. Some officials pointed to the August contracts as demonstrating that $100 oil was a blip and things would “normalize” quickly. While $80 was still higher than pre-war, the argument had some legs. But now, the August contract is up to $95, and we are seeing $80 priced in all the way into 2027. This is certainly “higher for longer.” What is increasingly concerning is that it is difficult to tell if this is pricing in a re-opening or not. It was entirely plausible, a month or more ago, to believe that with the Strait of Hormuz getting back to normal levels of transit, global energy prices would “normalize” quickly. It is increasingly unclear what the “new” normal is. How much damage has been done to the “organism” that is energy? How quickly can things be fixed? Is the “new” normal the same as the “old” normal (see "Why One Bank Thinks It's "Magical Thinking" That Hormuz Reopens In June")?

Increasingly there are more and more questions about how long the damage will last, and if that damage will continue to elevate not just the price of oil, but also gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, etc.

The U.S. can continue to release its Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR). It is unclear how low the reserves can go (I’m told that some amount needs to be left in place for structural integrity). We have released about ½ of what was added back to the SPR. Keep an eye on this, as it does limit our options over time. No one is expecting the problems to last that long, yet here we are, 3 months into the conflict, and transit through the Strait remains limited. Higher for longer in the oil market is the single biggest issue for Global Affordability.

AI versus Affordability

We received some consumer spending data this week which wasn’t too bad. It did seem to highlight, yet again, the problems facing people in the lower income brackets. I’m not convinced it doesn’t obfuscate that we are spending more to get less, but that is for another day. But here is a “simplified” version of a chart I’ve seen in various formats.

Companies servicing the consumer are not seeing much appreciation in their stock price.

Companies making chips are growing like gangbusters!

Is this sustainable? That question is being asked with increased urgency. The “parabolic” rise is raising some concerns. Without a doubt, this is the sector experiencing growth. It does seem to justify not only today’s prices, but also possibly even higher multiples. The earnings engine (and growth) is there, but this market has had a habit of hitting “high-conviction” trades.

I find this chart extremely weird, but also interesting.

SOXL is a 3x leveraged SOX ETF. The assets in this ETF are about $20 billion, but the shares outstanding have been declining. While it may be inappropriate to label SOXL as a “degen” trade, I’m going to go there. “Degen” is an “affectionate” way of describing a group of very aggressive investors. Whether it is day trading leveraged ETFs, making bets in crypto altcoins, or playing in 0DTE options, there is a crowd of very aggressive traders that I will call “degen” for now (Warren Buffett would probably just call them gamblers).

I do think this crowd represents the “tip of the spear” on retail sentiment. If that assessment is correct, then it might indicate that retail is done (or almost done) fueling this trade.

The SOXX ETF weighs in at $33 billion (I had to do a double take, that it is “only” $33 billion while SOXL is $20 billion). The share count here tends to be more correlated with price. If anything, the last decline in SOXX was possibly telegraphed by a declining share count.

My view is that retail is slowing down on the semi-trade, just as institutions, including hedge funds, are treating it as a “must-have” position.

Retail, unlike funds, don’t have stop losses. Is this setting up for a pullback? Based more on positioning, and who is positioned, rather than the fundamentals?

Without the AI and semi story, market averages would be much lower. That is a fact. Is there anything to indicate that this trade cannot continue? No. But, I am curious what retail is up to here, and whether we are seeing enough of a pullback to create a reasonable pullback?

Which Brings Us To Rates

Yes, I “cherry picked” April 2024 as a starting point, because the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is unchanged, while rates across the globe have risen. Most noticeably for Japan. In 2 years, the 10-year JGB went from yielding less than 1% to almost 3%. This is incredibly important. Japan as a “nation of savers” has been funding much of the world’s debt. I remain convinced that “at or near-zero” bond buyers of all levels of sophistication will take steps to get positive yield. So, when Japan hovered near 0% on rates, many investors would find alternatives to their domestic market to get yield. That has changed.

Globally, U.S. Treasuries, are fairly “generic.”

  • If you do not need dollar exposure, you have local FX bonds that can serve your needs.
  • All countries face a variety of risks to their economy. All central banks are trying to navigate the data, their expectations, and their mandate. It is less certain today how the U.S. central bank will respond to data than it was a few months ago – so that uncertainty should have a cost?
    • It is likely one reason why our agency debt team is seeing agency and super sovereign debt spreads to Treasuries at very low levels.

Defense Spending Requires Money

  • While ProSec is about far more than defense spending, it certainly incorporates the need to spend more. Japan – spending more. Europe/NATO – spending more and it seems inevitable that they will have to ramp that up.

The AI and Data Center Build Out Competes for Money

  • The semiconductor valuations depend heavily on data center and AI spending. That is being funded in a large part by debt.

We have been arguing for “range-bound” Treasury trading, while slowly raising the midpoint of the range.

I’m a bit hesitant to be very bearish on bonds here, as 5% or so on 30s (we are well above 5.12% as of Friday’s close) has been a level where this admin has taken steps to drive yields lower.

I could see an “Operation Twist” sort of announcement (the Fed selling shorter-dated bonds they own, to buy longer-dated bonds), but I’m not sure they are prepared to act.

What I find “interesting” is that Bessent no longer seems to be able to do “no wrong.” At the height of Liberation Day fears, Bessent could appear on TV and calm things instantaneously. I heard of the TACO BELL trade. Trump Always Chickens Out. Bessent Explains Longer Later. It was pretty clever (I did not come up with that).

Maybe it is because the Iran conflict is so far removed from what a Treasury Secretary does, that his latest appearances haven’t had the same impact? Maybe I have Bessent Delusion Syndrome? (Anything is possible).

But as many market participants seem to be waiting for some sort of “intervention” to helps bonds, I’m left wondering if they can accomplish that easily now? 

Global bond yields are not helping. Higher for Longer on oil is not helping (that seems easier to correct – via peace with Iran, but that doesn’t seem imminent).

Bottom Line

Not “pound the table” bearish on bonds or stocks, but certainly not bullish. Not even really bullish for a trade. With the President likely looking for some “wins” and the admin likely exploring what they can do on the yield front, we could see relief in bond yields and higher stock prices, but I want hedges and would fade any such bounce. Price action in stocks seemed almost “sickly” on Thursday and Friday where every bounce/rally met some serious selling. Maybe all the AI-trained algos have read Sell in May and Go Away? Sorry, had to go there.

Caution into the summer seems warranted. Markets have priced in a lot of good news (China, Iran, and Semis), often multiple times (at some point is an earnings surprise really a surprise when everyone surprises the same way?).

Maybe it is time to “unprice” some of the good news? Affordability remains an issue and it seems to be becoming increasingly entrenched, which is a problem for bonds and stocks as a whole, if not just for the AI/data center spend, where my bigger questions are around positioning, than anything else.

Tyler Durden Sun, 05/17/2026 - 12:50

Pages