Zero Hedge

Trump Issues 'Last Warning' To Hamas, Promises Deal On Gaza 'Very Soon'

Trump Issues 'Last Warning' To Hamas, Promises Deal On Gaza 'Very Soon'

Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,

President Donald Trump on Sunday issued a “last warning” to the Hamas terrorist group to accept a deal to secure the release of all hostages still held by the group.

He said in a post on Truth Social that Israel “[has] accepted my terms. It is time for Hamas to accept as well. I have warned Hamas about the consequences of not accepting. This is my last warning, there will not be another one!

The specific terms being negotiated by Trump have not been publicly released.

In comments to reporters at Joint Base Andrews after he returned from a brief trip to New York, Trump expressed confidence that his administration could reach a deal to end the conflict between Israel and Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip “very soon.”

“It’s a problem we want to solve, for the Middle East, for Israel, for everybody,” Trump said.

Israel launched an invasion into the Gaza Strip following an Oct. 7, 2023, surprise attack by Hamas terrorists into Israel, an attack that killed over 1,200 Israelis. A total of 251 people, including both Israeli and American citizens, were kidnapped during the incursion.

Of the 48 hostages who are still being held by Hamas, Trump expressed hope that all could be returned through diplomacy.

“I think we’re going to get them all,” he said.

He acknowledged that some may have died before they could be rescued. In such cases, the United States will pursue a return of the victim’s remains.

As the Trump administration continues to work towards an end to the war in Ukraine, Trump reiterated his intentions to bring an end to the Middle Eastern conflict.

“We’re working on a solution that may be very good,” the president said.

On Saturday, Israel-based N12 News reported that Trump had put forward a new cease-fire proposal to Hamas, under which Hamas would reportedly release the 48 remaining hostages in exchange for the release of thousands of Palestinians jailed in Israel. The plan calls for negotiations to end the conflict in the Gaza Strip entirely during the cease-fire.

The Epoch Times has contacted the White House for comment.

Trump said in his post that Israel is on board with his proposal, although Israeli officials have not yet publicly backed the plan.

Hamas said following Trump’s online post that it received some ideas from the United States on how to reach a cease-fire deal in Gaza and was discussing ways to develop those ideas but gave no specific details about any potential agreement.

The terrorist group in a statement repeated its openness to negotiations for the release of hostages in exchange for a “clear announcement of an end to the war” and withdrawal of all Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip.

Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 17:00

Trump Issues 'Last Warning' To Hamas, Promises Deal On Gaza 'Very Soon'

Trump Issues 'Last Warning' To Hamas, Promises Deal On Gaza 'Very Soon'

Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,

President Donald Trump on Sunday issued a “last warning” to the Hamas terrorist group to accept a deal to secure the release of all hostages still held by the group.

He said in a post on Truth Social that Israel “[has] accepted my terms. It is time for Hamas to accept as well. I have warned Hamas about the consequences of not accepting. This is my last warning, there will not be another one!

The specific terms being negotiated by Trump have not been publicly released.

In comments to reporters at Joint Base Andrews after he returned from a brief trip to New York, Trump expressed confidence that his administration could reach a deal to end the conflict between Israel and Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip “very soon.”

“It’s a problem we want to solve, for the Middle East, for Israel, for everybody,” Trump said.

Israel launched an invasion into the Gaza Strip following an Oct. 7, 2023, surprise attack by Hamas terrorists into Israel, an attack that killed over 1,200 Israelis. A total of 251 people, including both Israeli and American citizens, were kidnapped during the incursion.

Of the 48 hostages who are still being held by Hamas, Trump expressed hope that all could be returned through diplomacy.

“I think we’re going to get them all,” he said.

He acknowledged that some may have died before they could be rescued. In such cases, the United States will pursue a return of the victim’s remains.

As the Trump administration continues to work towards an end to the war in Ukraine, Trump reiterated his intentions to bring an end to the Middle Eastern conflict.

“We’re working on a solution that may be very good,” the president said.

On Saturday, Israel-based N12 News reported that Trump had put forward a new cease-fire proposal to Hamas, under which Hamas would reportedly release the 48 remaining hostages in exchange for the release of thousands of Palestinians jailed in Israel. The plan calls for negotiations to end the conflict in the Gaza Strip entirely during the cease-fire.

The Epoch Times has contacted the White House for comment.

Trump said in his post that Israel is on board with his proposal, although Israeli officials have not yet publicly backed the plan.

Hamas said following Trump’s online post that it received some ideas from the United States on how to reach a cease-fire deal in Gaza and was discussing ways to develop those ideas but gave no specific details about any potential agreement.

The terrorist group in a statement repeated its openness to negotiations for the release of hostages in exchange for a “clear announcement of an end to the war” and withdrawal of all Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip.

Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 17:00

Venezuela Preparing For 'Armed Struggle' In Case Of US Attack: Maduro

Venezuela Preparing For 'Armed Struggle' In Case Of US Attack: Maduro

Venezuela is preparing for armed struggle in the scenario it comes under attack by the United States, or its sovereignty is threatened, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro warned soon after President Trump escalated the Pentagon's force posture in the southern Caribbean.

"If Venezuela were attacked in any way, it would move into a stage of planned and organized armed struggle by all its people against aggression, whether local, regional, or national, in defense of peace, territorial integrity, sovereignty, and our people," Maduro had said Friday. On Sunday, tens of thousands of more troops were mobilized.

Via Reuters

President Trump soon after warned that if Venezuelan jets keep buzzing US warships in regional waters, then they would be shot out of the sky (if deemed a threat to American vessels).

Maduro has confirmed initiation of militia training to involve citizens in the country's national defense efforts - a 'popular mobilization' of sorts. Interestingly, in a televised statement he featured a visual diagram, outlining the current levels of operational readiness within the nation's defense forces, stating that currently a "yellow phase" of integrated defense is active.

The Maduro government on Sunday called up additional troops to deploy in border regions amid the US deployments off Venezuela's coast:

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has ordered more troops in the Guajira region of Zulia state and the Paraguana peninsula in Falcon, Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino said, adding that the area constituted "a drug trafficking route".

The military's presence on the island of Nueva Esparta and in the states of Sucre and Delta Amacuro will also be expanded. Some 25,000 troops are set to be deployed, up from the 10,000 which have been deployed in the states of Zulia and Tachira that border Colombia, he said.

Some interesting scenes coming from the Venezuelan coast:

And so it seems Maduro is making an effort to convince Washington that he has the narco-trafficking situation in and around Venezuela fully under control.

Importantly, Trump has rejected accusations that the US is plotting regime change in Caracas. "We're not talking about that," he told reporters Friday when asked about this scenario.

The US has justified its recent actions, which included last week's military strike on an allegedly drug-laden boat that killed eleven people, by saying that Maduro is in league with the cartels.

Via Reuters

Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has called Maduro "effectively a kingpin of a drug narco state" and that because of this he "should be worried."

Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 16:40

Venezuela Preparing For 'Armed Struggle' In Case Of US Attack: Maduro

Venezuela Preparing For 'Armed Struggle' In Case Of US Attack: Maduro

Venezuela is preparing for armed struggle in the scenario it comes under attack by the United States, or its sovereignty is threatened, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro warned soon after President Trump escalated the Pentagon's force posture in the southern Caribbean.

"If Venezuela were attacked in any way, it would move into a stage of planned and organized armed struggle by all its people against aggression, whether local, regional, or national, in defense of peace, territorial integrity, sovereignty, and our people," Maduro had said Friday. On Sunday, tens of thousands of more troops were mobilized.

Via Reuters

President Trump soon after warned that if Venezuelan jets keep buzzing US warships in regional waters, then they would be shot out of the sky (if deemed a threat to American vessels).

Maduro has confirmed initiation of militia training to involve citizens in the country's national defense efforts - a 'popular mobilization' of sorts. Interestingly, in a televised statement he featured a visual diagram, outlining the current levels of operational readiness within the nation's defense forces, stating that currently a "yellow phase" of integrated defense is active.

The Maduro government on Sunday called up additional troops to deploy in border regions amid the US deployments off Venezuela's coast:

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has ordered more troops in the Guajira region of Zulia state and the Paraguana peninsula in Falcon, Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino said, adding that the area constituted "a drug trafficking route".

The military's presence on the island of Nueva Esparta and in the states of Sucre and Delta Amacuro will also be expanded. Some 25,000 troops are set to be deployed, up from the 10,000 which have been deployed in the states of Zulia and Tachira that border Colombia, he said.

Some interesting scenes coming from the Venezuelan coast:

And so it seems Maduro is making an effort to convince Washington that he has the narco-trafficking situation in and around Venezuela fully under control.

Importantly, Trump has rejected accusations that the US is plotting regime change in Caracas. "We're not talking about that," he told reporters Friday when asked about this scenario.

The US has justified its recent actions, which included last week's military strike on an allegedly drug-laden boat that killed eleven people, by saying that Maduro is in league with the cartels.

Via Reuters

Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has called Maduro "effectively a kingpin of a drug narco state" and that because of this he "should be worried."

Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 16:40

Days Of Thunder

Days Of Thunder

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

"If we hadn’t won this election we would have all been vaxxed to death and censored so no one could hear our dying screams"

- Mike Benz on "X"

That reckoning you’ve heard about lo these many years? It’s here now. We’re in it.

You just can’t see all the moving parts, and if you did, you might not understand how or where they are moving, and what they are fixing to do next. Aside from certain US senators playing their pre-scripted mad scenes for the cameras, a disquieting quiet blankets the swamp like a miasma.

It feels like a long, still moment before some shaking of the earth. Everyone senses it and the guilty must feel it most keenly.

That’s why they are laying low and keeping their traps shut.

Every criminal defense lawyer inside the beltway is burning the midnight oil (and racking up the billable hours, ka-ching). Meanwhile, where are their clients? No longer peddling alibis on MSNBC (MSNOW), at least. I doubt that John Brennan is even in the country. My guess would be he’s cooling his heels in Abu Dhabi, where the extradition protocols with the USA remain comfortably squishy to his advantage. (He reportedly became a Muslim while running the CIA station in Riyadh between 1996-99, just in time for 9-11. . . hmmmm. . . .)

Hillary Clinton has been keeping her pie-hole closed for weeks now while rattling around that big house in Chappaqua, NY, like a BB in a packing crate. Is anyone counting the wine-boxes coming and going from the place? It must be maddening to be HRC — but that new extra edge of prosecution terror would just be larding the lily, considering what Vlad Putin learned about her mental state way back in 2016: deeply unstable. . .diabetic. . . on tranqs. . . often plastered. . . bursts of rage. . . .

Comey and Clapper? No more cute pranks on the beach for Big Jim, 86 on the menacing messages in seashells and putting out Taylor Swift fan-boy Tik-toks. Was that some attempt to not be taken seriously? Like you’re some kind of overgrown, harmless child?

James Clapper, of course, would be voted most likely to flip on his compadres, if such a canvass were taken on Coup island. He was the first to publicly announce his lawyering-up in the Russia collusion affair. He never expected it would come to this, this ordeal of interrogation. . . his “good soldier” self plopped ignominiously in the witness chair. . . the odor of his own fear. . . the proffer (just tell us what really happened). . . the US attorneys appearing to leer at him, his house mortgaged to pay the attorney’s fees. . . what’s a poor boy to do. . . ?

Adam Schiff has gone radio silent. A miracle! Alas, the autopen pardon granted for his J-6 Committee doings apparently does not apply to matters such as mortgage fraud and wire fraud. He realizes with chills and sighs of despair that this ain’t no foolin’ around. People go to jail for these things. . . gulp! His attorney absolutely forbids any televised appeals to his fan-base, as if the glamorati of Rodeo Drive could do anything to stop what’s coming. Too bad Ed Buck and his magic checkbook are no longer around.

Even the seeming untouchables, Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Lisa Monaco, Norm Eisen, Mary McCord, Anrew Weissmann, Marc Elias must be listening hard for shoes to drop. They thought they had it made in the shade after 2020. They had the USA on a string, they thought. Home free. The trouble with the smarty-pants way of life is sometimes you out-smart yourself and your pants fall down. But all they can do in this late hour is induce a bunch of federal judges — recently imported from countries where justice means casting goat neckbones across the dusty floor of a mud hut — to gum up every executive action coming out of the White House with a poorly-argued TRO. They might as well be on a U-haul box truck throwing furniture off the back at a fleet of pursuing cop cars.

Mr. Trump is having sport with them now. Their crimes spanning the decade past are being bundled into one big coup case against the country, a color revolution on their own citizens and against “the democracy” that they never stop pretending to tout. If I am perceiving all this correctly, the days and weeks ahead will be as consequential a train of events as ever rolled down the tracks into Union Station, DC.

Looks like it will start this week with Robert F Kennedy, Jr., announcing the suspected culprits in the great autism question. That will rock the pharma industry to the very hairs on its roots. They have been trying since the 1980s to bury that idea that autism comes from anything they do. Next, the nation will have to ask: why did it take Mr. Kennedy only seven months to arrive at a plausible answer to the decades’ long autism mystery? Maybe because it was not such a difficult mystery to solve. Just that nobody wanted to collate and assemble the information. The answer was too ugly. So, they buried it on-purpose.

That set of revelations will segue soon enough into the reveal of facts, data, studies retrieved from the thought-to-be hidden files of the CDC, FDA, and NIH as to just how damaging the Covid-19 vaccinations really were. . . which will lead to answers as to how the various agencies under HHS (and likely the Pentagon, too) conspired to materialize the Covid virus in the first place, and that means the names and titles of actual persons whop did it: the deputy secretaries of this and that, higher-ups, folks in dark NGOs. . . and all that will combine with new information about the supremely messed-up election of 2020, and so on down the long line of the many related, serial coup operations.

It’s one thing to reveal all that information, with its criminal overtone. And it’s another thing to get around to prosecuting it. I doubt you will be disappointed, though. Like I said. We’re in it. It’s happening. It’s roiling under the surface.

Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 16:20

Days Of Thunder

Days Of Thunder

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

"If we hadn’t won this election we would have all been vaxxed to death and censored so no one could hear our dying screams"

- Mike Benz on "X"

That reckoning you’ve heard about lo these many years? It’s here now. We’re in it.

You just can’t see all the moving parts, and if you did, you might not understand how or where they are moving, and what they are fixing to do next. Aside from certain US senators playing their pre-scripted mad scenes for the cameras, a disquieting quiet blankets the swamp like a miasma.

It feels like a long, still moment before some shaking of the earth. Everyone senses it and the guilty must feel it most keenly.

That’s why they are laying low and keeping their traps shut.

Every criminal defense lawyer inside the beltway is burning the midnight oil (and racking up the billable hours, ka-ching). Meanwhile, where are their clients? No longer peddling alibis on MSNBC (MSNOW), at least. I doubt that John Brennan is even in the country. My guess would be he’s cooling his heels in Abu Dhabi, where the extradition protocols with the USA remain comfortably squishy to his advantage. (He reportedly became a Muslim while running the CIA station in Riyadh between 1996-99, just in time for 9-11. . . hmmmm. . . .)

Hillary Clinton has been keeping her pie-hole closed for weeks now while rattling around that big house in Chappaqua, NY, like a BB in a packing crate. Is anyone counting the wine-boxes coming and going from the place? It must be maddening to be HRC — but that new extra edge of prosecution terror would just be larding the lily, considering what Vlad Putin learned about her mental state way back in 2016: deeply unstable. . .diabetic. . . on tranqs. . . often plastered. . . bursts of rage. . . .

Comey and Clapper? No more cute pranks on the beach for Big Jim, 86 on the menacing messages in seashells and putting out Taylor Swift fan-boy Tik-toks. Was that some attempt to not be taken seriously? Like you’re some kind of overgrown, harmless child?

James Clapper, of course, would be voted most likely to flip on his compadres, if such a canvass were taken on Coup island. He was the first to publicly announce his lawyering-up in the Russia collusion affair. He never expected it would come to this, this ordeal of interrogation. . . his “good soldier” self plopped ignominiously in the witness chair. . . the odor of his own fear. . . the proffer (just tell us what really happened). . . the US attorneys appearing to leer at him, his house mortgaged to pay the attorney’s fees. . . what’s a poor boy to do. . . ?

Adam Schiff has gone radio silent. A miracle! Alas, the autopen pardon granted for his J-6 Committee doings apparently does not apply to matters such as mortgage fraud and wire fraud. He realizes with chills and sighs of despair that this ain’t no foolin’ around. People go to jail for these things. . . gulp! His attorney absolutely forbids any televised appeals to his fan-base, as if the glamorati of Rodeo Drive could do anything to stop what’s coming. Too bad Ed Buck and his magic checkbook are no longer around.

Even the seeming untouchables, Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Lisa Monaco, Norm Eisen, Mary McCord, Anrew Weissmann, Marc Elias must be listening hard for shoes to drop. They thought they had it made in the shade after 2020. They had the USA on a string, they thought. Home free. The trouble with the smarty-pants way of life is sometimes you out-smart yourself and your pants fall down. But all they can do in this late hour is induce a bunch of federal judges — recently imported from countries where justice means casting goat neckbones across the dusty floor of a mud hut — to gum up every executive action coming out of the White House with a poorly-argued TRO. They might as well be on a U-haul box truck throwing furniture off the back at a fleet of pursuing cop cars.

Mr. Trump is having sport with them now. Their crimes spanning the decade past are being bundled into one big coup case against the country, a color revolution on their own citizens and against “the democracy” that they never stop pretending to tout. If I am perceiving all this correctly, the days and weeks ahead will be as consequential a train of events as ever rolled down the tracks into Union Station, DC.

Looks like it will start this week with Robert F Kennedy, Jr., announcing the suspected culprits in the great autism question. That will rock the pharma industry to the very hairs on its roots. They have been trying since the 1980s to bury that idea that autism comes from anything they do. Next, the nation will have to ask: why did it take Mr. Kennedy only seven months to arrive at a plausible answer to the decades’ long autism mystery? Maybe because it was not such a difficult mystery to solve. Just that nobody wanted to collate and assemble the information. The answer was too ugly. So, they buried it on-purpose.

That set of revelations will segue soon enough into the reveal of facts, data, studies retrieved from the thought-to-be hidden files of the CDC, FDA, and NIH as to just how damaging the Covid-19 vaccinations really were. . . which will lead to answers as to how the various agencies under HHS (and likely the Pentagon, too) conspired to materialize the Covid virus in the first place, and that means the names and titles of actual persons whop did it: the deputy secretaries of this and that, higher-ups, folks in dark NGOs. . . and all that will combine with new information about the supremely messed-up election of 2020, and so on down the long line of the many related, serial coup operations.

It’s one thing to reveal all that information, with its criminal overtone. And it’s another thing to get around to prosecuting it. I doubt you will be disappointed, though. Like I said. We’re in it. It’s happening. It’s roiling under the surface.

Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 16:20

"Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

"Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

On an autumn day in 2011, Jeffrey Epstein stepped into JPMorgan Chase’s headquarters at 270 Park Avenue and rode the elevator to the executive floors where the bank’s leaders, including Chief Executive Jamie Dimon, kept their offices. Epstein, who had pleaded guilty to a sex crime in Florida three years earlier, had a message for the bank’s top lawyer, Stephen Cutler: he had “turned over a new leaf,” he said, and powerful friends could vouch for him. “Go talk to Bill Gates about me.”

Key takeaways:

  • Epstein was connected to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, not just former PM Ehud Barak

  • He wired 'hundreds of millions of dollars in payments to Russian banks and young Eastern European women'

  • Accounts for young women were opened without in-person verification (in one case a SSN could not be confirmed)

  • Jes Staley was constantly running interference for Epstein vs. JPM compliance concerns

    • At Jes Staley’s urging, compliance spoke with Epstein’s lawyer Ken Starr, who insisted "no crimes" had been committed. 

  • Epstein had accounts at JPM for at least 134 (!) entities

  • JPMorgan funded/serviced pieces tied to Ghislaine Maxwell (millions, incl. $7.4M for a Sikorsky helicopter) and helped finance MC2, the modeling agency linked to Jean-Luc Brunel.

For more than a decade, JPMorgan Chase processed over $1 billion in transactions for Jeffrey Epstein - including hundreds of millions routed to Russian banks and payments to young Eastern European women, opened at least 134 accounts tied to him and his associates, and even helped move millions to Ghislaine Maxwell - including $7.4 million for a Sikorsky helicopter - while anti–money laundering staff repeatedly flagged large cash withdrawals and wire patterns aligned with known trafficking indicators, according to a new report from the NY Times following a six-year investigation that involved "some 13,000 pages" of legal and financial records. Funny how they sat on this until now - maybe it's related to this, but do read on. 

Illustration via FT

Inside JPMorgan, the debate over whether to keep Epstein as a client had been simmering for years. Epstein was lucrative. His accounts held more than $200 million and generated millions in fees, and he opened doors to wealthy prospects and world leaders. He had helped midwife the bank’s 2004 purchase of Highbridge Capital Management, earning a $15 million payday. Senior bankers credited him with introductions to figures such as Sergey Brin and Benjamin Netanyahu. 

Sure enough, just as more bank employees were losing patience with Epstein in 2011, he began dangling more goodies. That March, to the pleasant surprise of JPMorgan’s investment bankers in Israel, they were granted an audience with Netanyahu. The bankers informed Staley, who forwarded their email to Epstein with a one-word message: “Thanks.” (The bank spokesman said JPMorgan “neither needed nor sought Epstein’s help for meetings with any government leaders.”) And around that same time, Epstein presented an opportunity that, like the Highbridge deal years earlier, had the potential to be transformative.

This one involved Bill Gates, who had only recently entered Epstein’s orbit. In an apparent effort to ingratiate — and further entangle — himself with his bankers and the Microsoft co-founder, Epstein pitched Erdoes and Staley on creating an enormous investment and charitable fund with something like $100 billion in assets. -NY Times

Compliance leaders urged the bank to "exit" the felon after anti–money laundering personnel flagged a yearslong pattern of large cash withdrawals and constant wires that, in hindsight, matched known indicators of trafficking and other illicit conduct.; instead, top executives overrode objections at least four times, allowed accounts for young women to be opened with scant verification, and paid Epstein directly - the aforementioned $15 million tied to a hedge-fund deal and $9 million in a settlement. Even in 2011, as concerns mounted, internal notes referenced decisions "pending Dimon review," while Jes Staley, a senior executive and Epstein confidant, traded sexually suggestive messages (“Say hi to Snow White”) and shared confidential bank information with the client.

Exact dollar figures and destinations across years:

  • $1.7M in cash (2004–05) and earlier $175K cash (2003).

  • $7.4M wired to buy Maxwell’s Sikorsky helicopter.

  • $50M credit line approved in 2010 even post-plea; ~$212M then at the bank (about half his net worth).

  • $176M moved to Deutsche Bank after the 2013 exit.

JPM of course regrets everything - calling their relationship with Epstein "a mistake and in hindsight we regret it, but we did not help him commit his heinous crimes," Joseph Evangelisti, a JPMorgan spokesman, said in a statement. "We would never have continued to do business with him if we believed he was engaged in an ongoing sex trafficking operation." The bank has placed much of the blame on Jes Staley, then a rising executive and close confidant of Epstein. "We now know that trust was misplaced," Evangelisti said.

A Client Too Valuable To Lose

Epstein’s ties to JPMorgan reached back to the late 1990s, when then–Chief Executive Sandy Warner met him at 60 Wall Street and urged a lieutenant, Mr. Staley, to do the same. Epstein soon became one of the private bank’s top revenue generators. A 2003 internal report estimated his net worth at $300 million and attributed more than $8 million in fees to him that year.

    Even then, there were warning signs. In 2003 alone, he withdrew more than $175,000 in cash. Bank employees recognized the need to report large cash transactions to federal monitors but failed to treat the withdrawals as a signal of deeper risk. In the years that followed, compliance staff repeatedly expressed alarm over Epstein’s wires, cash activity and requests to open accounts for young women with minimal verification. One internal note, describing large transfers to an 18-year-old totaling "about 450,000 since opening," read: “Sugar Daddy!”

    Still, influence carried weight. Epstein was prized not only for his personal balances but for the business he brought in. Through his network, which included hedge fund founder Glenn Dubin and a constellation of billionaires and officials, he introduced potential clients and helped shape the bank’s strategy. The Highbridge deal was heralded internally as “probably the most important transaction” of Mr. Staley’s career.

    Internal Dissent, Repeatedly Overruled

    From 2005 to 2011, the bank’s leaders revisited the Epstein question several times. In 2006, after a Florida indictment alleging solicitation from a teenage girl, JPMorgan convened a team to decide whether to exit the client. The bank swiftly jettisoned another customer, the actor Wesley Snipes, when he faced tax charges. It did not do the same with Epstein. Instead, it imposed a narrow restriction - not to “proactively solicit” new investments from him - while continuing to lend and move his money.

    Within the bank, even casual exchanges betrayed an awareness of Epstein’s proclivities. "So painful to read," Mary Erdoes, now head of asset and wealth management, emailed upon seeing news of the indictment. Mr. Staley replied that he had met Epstein the prior evening and that Epstein "adamantly denies" involvement with minors. At other moments, the tone turned flippant. Describing a Hamptons fundraiser, Mr. Staley wrote that the age gaps among couples "would have fit in well with Jeffrey," to which Ms. Erdoes replied that people were "laughing about Jeffrey."

    By 2008, after Epstein pleaded guilty and registered as a sex offender, pressure mounted to end the relationship. “No one wants him,” one banker wrote. Mr. Cutler, the general counsel, would later say he viewed Epstein as a reputational threat - “This is not an honorable person in any way. He should not be a client.” Yet he did not insist on expulsion, and the matter was not escalated to Mr. Dimon. Epstein remained.

    In early 2011, William Langford, head of compliance and a former Treasury official, urged that Epstein be “exited.” He warned that ultrawealthy clients could warp judgment and that patterns in Epstein’s accounts resembled those of trafficking networks.

    The bank’s head of compliance, William Langford, was especially alarmed. “No patience for this,” he emailed a colleague. Langford had joined JPMorgan in 2006 after years of policing financial crimes for the Treasury Department. He knew — and had warned colleagues — that companies can be criminally charged for money laundering if they willfully ignored such activities by their clients. He saw ultrawealthy customers as a particular blind spot; all the time that private bankers spent wining and dining these lucrative clients could cloud judgments about their trustworthiness. It looked like that was what was happening with Epstein. One of Langford’s achievements at JPMorgan was the creation of a task force devoted to combating human trafficking. The group noted in a presentation that frequent large cash withdrawals and wire transfers — exactly what employees were seeing in Epstein’s accounts — were totems of such illicit activity.

    ...

    Langford said in a deposition that he started off by quickly explaining the human-trafficking initiative. In that context, how could the bank justify working with someone who had pleaded guilty to a sex crime and was now under investigation for sex trafficking? -NY Times

    Mr. Staley pushed back, relaying Epstein’s insistence that allegations would be overturned. Days later, the bank agreed to keep the accounts open.

    Money, Access and a Second Chance

    Even as internal skepticism grew, Epstein stayed in touch with his former private banker, Justin Nelson, and continued to surface in meetings involving Leon Black, a billionaire client. Staley remained close to Epstein for years, exchanging personal messages and visiting his residences, even as he ascended to run Barclays. In 2019, after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges and later died by suicide in a Manhattan jail, investigators, journalists and regulators turned anew to his banking relationships.

    JPMorgan launched an internal review, code-named Project Jeep, and filed belated suspicious activity reports flagging about 4,700 Epstein transactions totaling more than $1.1 billion. The bank settled civil claims with Epstein’s victims for $290 million and with the U.S. Virgin Islands for $75 million, without admitting wrongdoing. No executives lost their jobs. Mr. Dimon, who testified that he did not recall knowing about Epstein before 2019, remains one of the most powerful figures in American finance.

    To Bridgette Carr, a law professor and anti-trafficking expert retained by the Virgin Islands, the case poses a larger question about incentives. JPMorgan, she concluded, enabled Epstein’s crimes. “I am deeply worried here that the ultimate message to other financial institutions is that they can keep serving traffickers,” she said. “It’s still profitable to do that, given the lack of substantial consequences.”

    Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 15:40

    "Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

    "Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

    On an autumn day in 2011, Jeffrey Epstein stepped into JPMorgan Chase’s headquarters at 270 Park Avenue and rode the elevator to the executive floors where the bank’s leaders, including Chief Executive Jamie Dimon, kept their offices. Epstein, who had pleaded guilty to a sex crime in Florida three years earlier, had a message for the bank’s top lawyer, Stephen Cutler: he had “turned over a new leaf,” he said, and powerful friends could vouch for him. “Go talk to Bill Gates about me.”

    Key takeaways:

    • Epstein was connected to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, not just former PM Ehud Barak

    • He wired 'hundreds of millions of dollars in payments to Russian banks and young Eastern European women'

    • Accounts for young women were opened without in-person verification (in one case a SSN could not be confirmed)

    • Jes Staley was constantly running interference for Epstein vs. JPM compliance concerns

      • At Jes Staley’s urging, compliance spoke with Epstein’s lawyer Ken Starr, who insisted "no crimes" had been committed. 

    • Epstein had accounts at JPM for at least 134 (!) entities

    • JPMorgan funded/serviced pieces tied to Ghislaine Maxwell (millions, incl. $7.4M for a Sikorsky helicopter) and helped finance MC2, the modeling agency linked to Jean-Luc Brunel.

    For more than a decade, JPMorgan Chase processed over $1 billion in transactions for Jeffrey Epstein - including hundreds of millions routed to Russian banks and payments to young Eastern European women, opened at least 134 accounts tied to him and his associates, and even helped move millions to Ghislaine Maxwell - including $7.4 million for a Sikorsky helicopter - while anti–money laundering staff repeatedly flagged large cash withdrawals and wire patterns aligned with known trafficking indicators, according to a new report from the NY Times following a six-year investigation that involved "some 13,000 pages" of legal and financial records. Funny how they sat on this until now - maybe it's related to this, but do read on. 

    Illustration via FT

    Inside JPMorgan, the debate over whether to keep Epstein as a client had been simmering for years. Epstein was lucrative. His accounts held more than $200 million and generated millions in fees, and he opened doors to wealthy prospects and world leaders. He had helped midwife the bank’s 2004 purchase of Highbridge Capital Management, earning a $15 million payday. Senior bankers credited him with introductions to figures such as Sergey Brin and Benjamin Netanyahu. 

    Sure enough, just as more bank employees were losing patience with Epstein in 2011, he began dangling more goodies. That March, to the pleasant surprise of JPMorgan’s investment bankers in Israel, they were granted an audience with Netanyahu. The bankers informed Staley, who forwarded their email to Epstein with a one-word message: “Thanks.” (The bank spokesman said JPMorgan “neither needed nor sought Epstein’s help for meetings with any government leaders.”) And around that same time, Epstein presented an opportunity that, like the Highbridge deal years earlier, had the potential to be transformative.

    This one involved Bill Gates, who had only recently entered Epstein’s orbit. In an apparent effort to ingratiate — and further entangle — himself with his bankers and the Microsoft co-founder, Epstein pitched Erdoes and Staley on creating an enormous investment and charitable fund with something like $100 billion in assets. -NY Times

    Compliance leaders urged the bank to "exit" the felon after anti–money laundering personnel flagged a yearslong pattern of large cash withdrawals and constant wires that, in hindsight, matched known indicators of trafficking and other illicit conduct.; instead, top executives overrode objections at least four times, allowed accounts for young women to be opened with scant verification, and paid Epstein directly - the aforementioned $15 million tied to a hedge-fund deal and $9 million in a settlement. Even in 2011, as concerns mounted, internal notes referenced decisions "pending Dimon review," while Jes Staley, a senior executive and Epstein confidant, traded sexually suggestive messages (“Say hi to Snow White”) and shared confidential bank information with the client.

    Exact dollar figures and destinations across years:

    • $1.7M in cash (2004–05) and earlier $175K cash (2003).

    • $7.4M wired to buy Maxwell’s Sikorsky helicopter.

    • $50M credit line approved in 2010 even post-plea; ~$212M then at the bank (about half his net worth).

    • $176M moved to Deutsche Bank after the 2013 exit.

    JPM of course regrets everything - calling their relationship with Epstein "a mistake and in hindsight we regret it, but we did not help him commit his heinous crimes," Joseph Evangelisti, a JPMorgan spokesman, said in a statement. "We would never have continued to do business with him if we believed he was engaged in an ongoing sex trafficking operation." The bank has placed much of the blame on Jes Staley, then a rising executive and close confidant of Epstein. "We now know that trust was misplaced," Evangelisti said.

    A Client Too Valuable To Lose

    Epstein’s ties to JPMorgan reached back to the late 1990s, when then–Chief Executive Sandy Warner met him at 60 Wall Street and urged a lieutenant, Mr. Staley, to do the same. Epstein soon became one of the private bank’s top revenue generators. A 2003 internal report estimated his net worth at $300 million and attributed more than $8 million in fees to him that year.

      Even then, there were warning signs. In 2003 alone, he withdrew more than $175,000 in cash. Bank employees recognized the need to report large cash transactions to federal monitors but failed to treat the withdrawals as a signal of deeper risk. In the years that followed, compliance staff repeatedly expressed alarm over Epstein’s wires, cash activity and requests to open accounts for young women with minimal verification. One internal note, describing large transfers to an 18-year-old totaling "about 450,000 since opening," read: “Sugar Daddy!”

      Still, influence carried weight. Epstein was prized not only for his personal balances but for the business he brought in. Through his network, which included hedge fund founder Glenn Dubin and a constellation of billionaires and officials, he introduced potential clients and helped shape the bank’s strategy. The Highbridge deal was heralded internally as “probably the most important transaction” of Mr. Staley’s career.

      Internal Dissent, Repeatedly Overruled

      From 2005 to 2011, the bank’s leaders revisited the Epstein question several times. In 2006, after a Florida indictment alleging solicitation from a teenage girl, JPMorgan convened a team to decide whether to exit the client. The bank swiftly jettisoned another customer, the actor Wesley Snipes, when he faced tax charges. It did not do the same with Epstein. Instead, it imposed a narrow restriction - not to “proactively solicit” new investments from him - while continuing to lend and move his money.

      Within the bank, even casual exchanges betrayed an awareness of Epstein’s proclivities. "So painful to read," Mary Erdoes, now head of asset and wealth management, emailed upon seeing news of the indictment. Mr. Staley replied that he had met Epstein the prior evening and that Epstein "adamantly denies" involvement with minors. At other moments, the tone turned flippant. Describing a Hamptons fundraiser, Mr. Staley wrote that the age gaps among couples "would have fit in well with Jeffrey," to which Ms. Erdoes replied that people were "laughing about Jeffrey."

      By 2008, after Epstein pleaded guilty and registered as a sex offender, pressure mounted to end the relationship. “No one wants him,” one banker wrote. Mr. Cutler, the general counsel, would later say he viewed Epstein as a reputational threat - “This is not an honorable person in any way. He should not be a client.” Yet he did not insist on expulsion, and the matter was not escalated to Mr. Dimon. Epstein remained.

      In early 2011, William Langford, head of compliance and a former Treasury official, urged that Epstein be “exited.” He warned that ultrawealthy clients could warp judgment and that patterns in Epstein’s accounts resembled those of trafficking networks.

      The bank’s head of compliance, William Langford, was especially alarmed. “No patience for this,” he emailed a colleague. Langford had joined JPMorgan in 2006 after years of policing financial crimes for the Treasury Department. He knew — and had warned colleagues — that companies can be criminally charged for money laundering if they willfully ignored such activities by their clients. He saw ultrawealthy customers as a particular blind spot; all the time that private bankers spent wining and dining these lucrative clients could cloud judgments about their trustworthiness. It looked like that was what was happening with Epstein. One of Langford’s achievements at JPMorgan was the creation of a task force devoted to combating human trafficking. The group noted in a presentation that frequent large cash withdrawals and wire transfers — exactly what employees were seeing in Epstein’s accounts — were totems of such illicit activity.

      ...

      Langford said in a deposition that he started off by quickly explaining the human-trafficking initiative. In that context, how could the bank justify working with someone who had pleaded guilty to a sex crime and was now under investigation for sex trafficking? -NY Times

      Mr. Staley pushed back, relaying Epstein’s insistence that allegations would be overturned. Days later, the bank agreed to keep the accounts open.

      Money, Access and a Second Chance

      Even as internal skepticism grew, Epstein stayed in touch with his former private banker, Justin Nelson, and continued to surface in meetings involving Leon Black, a billionaire client. Staley remained close to Epstein for years, exchanging personal messages and visiting his residences, even as he ascended to run Barclays. In 2019, after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges and later died by suicide in a Manhattan jail, investigators, journalists and regulators turned anew to his banking relationships.

      JPMorgan launched an internal review, code-named Project Jeep, and filed belated suspicious activity reports flagging about 4,700 Epstein transactions totaling more than $1.1 billion. The bank settled civil claims with Epstein’s victims for $290 million and with the U.S. Virgin Islands for $75 million, without admitting wrongdoing. No executives lost their jobs. Mr. Dimon, who testified that he did not recall knowing about Epstein before 2019, remains one of the most powerful figures in American finance.

      To Bridgette Carr, a law professor and anti-trafficking expert retained by the Virgin Islands, the case poses a larger question about incentives. JPMorgan, she concluded, enabled Epstein’s crimes. “I am deeply worried here that the ultimate message to other financial institutions is that they can keep serving traffickers,” she said. “It’s still profitable to do that, given the lack of substantial consequences.”

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 15:40

      'Critically Uneducated': Russia, China Mock EU's Kaja Kallas After Bizarre Commentary

      'Critically Uneducated': Russia, China Mock EU's Kaja Kallas After Bizarre Commentary

      European foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas is being widely mocked after a clip of her latest remarks on Russia and China went viral starting last week.

      While speaking at an event hosted by the EU Institute for Security Studies, Kallas presented some strange analysis claiming that Russians are strong in social sciences but weak in tech, and that the Chinese are the reverse. The comments lacked explanation or nuance, and came off as utterly simplistic and based merely on overly broad stereotypes in her mind.

      "Chinese are very good at technology but they are not that good in social sciences," Kallas said. "The Russians… are not good at technology at all, but super good in social sciences."

      She's also being called out for her reflections on the Soviet Union and China in World War 2. Her comments were a response to President Xi's massive military parade in Beijing. 

      Kallas, who is from Estonia, of course very much hates Russia and so does not want to give credit to Moscow's immense role in WWII against the Nazis. She dismissed the Russians and China's role in defeating the axis powers.

      She had said the following which has additionally angered both countries:

      I was at the ASEAN summit, and something seemed interesting to me. Russia turned to China and said: "We, Russia and China, fought together in The Second World War, we won the Second World War, we defeated Nazism together.

      And I thought, "Okay, this is something new. If you know a little history, then a lot of questions immediately arise in your head. But you know, today people read and remember history less and less, so, unfortunately, many people believe in such narratives."

      On Sunday the Russian foreign ministry blasted her analysis, calling Kallas "critically uneducated". Specifically on her labeling Russian and Chinese societies, the FM spokesperson said--

      “On the same note, China would not be able to govern a billion citizens without being strong in social sciences,” Zakharova wrote. “Kallas is critically uneducated.”

      China's foreign ministry has also responded, saying, "The statement made by the relevant EU official is full of ideological bias and lacks basic historical common sense, and blatantly stokes rivalry and confrontation. This is disrespectful to the history of WW2 and undermines the EU's own interests. It's preposterous and irresponsible."

      One China commentator, Arnaud Bertrand, concluded: "It takes a lot for China to officially call a senior foreign leader an idiot but that's what they essentially just did."

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 15:20

      'Critically Uneducated': Russia, China Mock EU's Kaja Kallas After Bizarre Commentary

      'Critically Uneducated': Russia, China Mock EU's Kaja Kallas After Bizarre Commentary

      European foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas is being widely mocked after a clip of her latest remarks on Russia and China went viral starting last week.

      While speaking at an event hosted by the EU Institute for Security Studies, Kallas presented some strange analysis claiming that Russians are strong in social sciences but weak in tech, and that the Chinese are the reverse. The comments lacked explanation or nuance, and came off as utterly simplistic and based merely on overly broad stereotypes in her mind.

      "Chinese are very good at technology but they are not that good in social sciences," Kallas said. "The Russians… are not good at technology at all, but super good in social sciences."

      She's also being called out for her reflections on the Soviet Union and China in World War 2. Her comments were a response to President Xi's massive military parade in Beijing. 

      Kallas, who is from Estonia, of course very much hates Russia and so does not want to give credit to Moscow's immense role in WWII against the Nazis. She dismissed the Russians and China's role in defeating the axis powers.

      She had said the following which has additionally angered both countries:

      I was at the ASEAN summit, and something seemed interesting to me. Russia turned to China and said: "We, Russia and China, fought together in The Second World War, we won the Second World War, we defeated Nazism together.

      And I thought, "Okay, this is something new. If you know a little history, then a lot of questions immediately arise in your head. But you know, today people read and remember history less and less, so, unfortunately, many people believe in such narratives."

      On Sunday the Russian foreign ministry blasted her analysis, calling Kallas "critically uneducated". Specifically on her labeling Russian and Chinese societies, the FM spokesperson said--

      “On the same note, China would not be able to govern a billion citizens without being strong in social sciences,” Zakharova wrote. “Kallas is critically uneducated.”

      China's foreign ministry has also responded, saying, "The statement made by the relevant EU official is full of ideological bias and lacks basic historical common sense, and blatantly stokes rivalry and confrontation. This is disrespectful to the history of WW2 and undermines the EU's own interests. It's preposterous and irresponsible."

      One China commentator, Arnaud Bertrand, concluded: "It takes a lot for China to officially call a senior foreign leader an idiot but that's what they essentially just did."

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 15:20

      French Govt Collapses As PM Loses Confidence Vote, To Resign Tomorrow

      French Govt Collapses As PM Loses Confidence Vote, To Resign Tomorrow

      Update (1300ET): As we previewed and expected, French PM Francois Bayrou, the fourth prime minister in just 20 months, became the latest to depart having failed to get sufficient support to push a budget through parliament as 194 voted for him, 364 against.

      Bayrou is reportedly going to submit his resignation to Macron early Tuesday, according to a government course.

      Macron has limited options to steer France out of this crisis, according to PoliticoEU.

      He is reportedly leaning toward appointing another prime minister — the fifth since January 2024 — but a new premier would face the same intractable parliament.

      So too would a technical government made up of civil servants.

      Another snap election looks unappetizing, though, as it could easily deliver another hung parliament.

      In an extreme scenario, Macron could even resign, but that’s highly unlikely given his past statements.

      Macron’s office hasn’t said whether he will speak tonight.

      The EURUSD dipped very modestly on the news but remains higher on the day...

      *  *  *

      You can support ZeroHedge with the purchase of a Waxed-canvas hat or a Multitool (or anything else we sell!)

      *  *  *

      Prime Minister Francois Bayrou’s government will likely fall Monday, a victim of his push to chip away at France’s massive debt load.  The premier called the vote to rally lawmaker support for his plan to narrow France’s 2026 deficit to 4.6% of economic output from an expected 5.4% this year. That plan includes €44 billion ($51.6 billion) of spending cuts and tax hikes. He also floated an unpopular proposal to cut two public holidays as a way to reduce costs in Europe’s second-largest economy.  France’s fiscal deficit is now the widest in the euro area. Debt is rising by €5,000 ($5,840) a second, and the cost of servicing it is set to hit €75 billion next year, according to the government.

      His plan may have backfired, however, as opposition parties in the National Assembly have mobilized against Bayrou’s minority government.

      “There are moments when we need a rude shock,” Bayrou told France 5 television on Saturday. “There’s never been a situation as blindingly clear as this one.”

      Bayrou will make a policy speech starting at 3 p.m. Paris time, followed by interventions by the political groups in the National Assembly.

      The vote will take place in the evening, with the result expected between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. (1400-1500ET)

      Below is a full primer of what to expect, courtesy of Newsquawk

      VOTE

      • French PM Bayrou called a confidence vote in order to get support for his fiscal plans. The vote is scheduled for Monday, September 8th - timing TBC.
      • As it stands, Bayrou is expected to lose the vote. There was some chance of his plans passing, though it would have required the support of at least one of the parties in opposition, as Bayrou’s government commands 210/577 Lower House seats, shy of the 289 majority figure.
      • To obtain 289, Bayrou would have needed to court either National Rally (RN) or a minimum of two parties from the Left. Note, the actual threshold to remain may be less than 289, as officials who abstain are removed from the calculation i.e. the majority of votes cast determines the outcome.
      • Parties on the Left have made clear that they will not be backing Bayrou; most pertinently, Socialist Party (PS/SOC) head Faure told Le Monde it would be “inconceivable' for them to back Bayrou's measures. Bayrou met with the Socialists on September 4th, but no breakthrough has been reported from this.
      • At the other end of the spectrum, RN President Bardella said “the miracle did not happen" in talks between Le Pen and Bayrou, remarking that the PM's fiscal plan crosses some RN red lines and they do not have confidence in the government.
      • Overall, Bayrou's failure to court support of the Left and/or Right means, barring an 11th hour change, that he will lose the confidence motion and Bayrou will have almost no choice but to resign.

      TIMINGS

      • In terms of the timing, Politico reports that PM Bayrou will speak in the National Assembly at 14:00BST/09:00ET to deliver a policy statement. Thereafter, each of the political groups will have the opportunity to speak and the PM can in turn respond to questions from the officials.
      • Thereafter, the statement and responses by Bayrou will be subject to a confidence vote. The verdict of this, Politico estimates, will not be known until 18:00BST/13:00ET at the earliest.
      • Following the vote, and assuming Bayrou loses the confidence motion, he submits his resignation to President Macron, who then dictates the next steps.

      OUTCOMES

      • There are a handful of potential scenarios ahead. 1) Bayrou wins the vote and pushes his reform plans through (very unlikely). 2) Bayrou loses, resigns and a new PM is appointed as part of the existing, or more likely an expanded coalition (possible). 3) Bayrou loses, resigns and a new PM cannot be agreed upon by the current parliament, causing President Macron to dissolve the Lower House and call new elections (possible). 4) Bayrou loses, either two or three occurs and the political instability continues, or three occurs and National Rally emerges victorious; at which point, President Macron could elect to resign (Macron cannot run for another consecutive term).
        • 1) Very slim chance of occurring, the market would likely see immediate relief from the surprise support for and progress on required fiscal reform. However, the French political landscape remains fractured so any relief may, ultimately, prove fleeting if the situation deteriorates once again in the weeks/months following.
        • 2) President Macron could appoint a new PM. However, any appointee would have the same issues Bayrou and Barnier before him, who faced a fractured political landscape, meaning this would be another sticking plaster rather than a lasting fix. One of the contenders for this could be current Finance Minister Lombard who, to the FT, outlined that Bayrou’s fall would necessitate concessions to the Left to secure broader support for reform. However, this feeler to the Socialist Party (PS) has already run into opposition from The Republicans (LR) as the right-leaning gov't coalition member has made clear they will not work with PS.
        • 3) Fresh legislative elections could be called by President Macron. However, the polling situation has not moved in Macron's favour since the 2024 election, as his Ensemble party has slipped by 21% of the vote share to c. 15% while RN and allies have been steady at around 32-33% (prev. 29%). Overall, the French system means an outright victory is very unlikely and as such the fractured political landscape would likely continue, with Macron running the risk of being President to a National Rally PM, likely Bardella.
        • 4) Macron has made clear that he has no intention of resigning ahead of his term ending around April 2027. Macron cannot seek a third consecutive term, though he could run again in 2032 or later, if he wished. If Macron stepped down, polling points to RN’s Bardella (Le Pen cannot run between 2025-2030 due to embezzlement, though she is planning to appeal this in the event of a Presidential election being called) securing victory in the first round with around 30% of the vote. Though, it is much less clear how he would fare in a second round vs Edouard Philippe, with polls for that round near-enough tied.
      • Note. Macron is reportedly seeking to avoid legislative elections, according to Bloomberg. The President believes that elections would result in another fractured political situation (outlined in scenario 3 above). Instead, Macron wishes to appoint a PM who could hold together the centrist bloc and court support from the Left, i.e scenario 2 and potentially a direct reference to someone like Lombard. However, the source makes clear that Macron is not ruling out legislative elections.
      • One final point of consideration are the strikes scheduled for September 10th, as there has been some talk of Macron potentially waiting until after the strikes pass before he announces his candidate to replace Bayrou.

      MARKET REACTION

      • Following the announcement of the confidence vote, French banks and bonds have been under pressure.
      • Emphasis has been on the moves in French yields with respect to European peers, particularly the OAT-Bund 10yr yield spread. Following the announcement, this peaked at 82.19bps, shy of the YTD high of 88bps and then the 2024 90bps peak.
      • Spreads have been gradually widening as we count down to the vote, though still shy of the mentioned YTD peak. Jefferies forecasts the spread to get towards 90bps into the vote and then, if Bayrou loses as expected, highlights a risk of an extension to 100bps if it results in fresh legislative elections. Note, the desk describes this as an attractive entry point as Presidential elections remain unlikely (Macron continues to make clear that he will not call for early Presidential elections).
      • On spreads, ECB's Lagarde has said they are attentive to the French movements but made clear that France is not in a situation which would require intervention.

      RATING AGENCIES

      • Given the tricky fiscal situation France is in, and the necessity for significant reform in order to bring key measures in-line with EU rules, rating agency updates have and continue to be keenly watched regarding France.
      • Reviews are due as follows: Fitch (AA-, negative) 12th September, DBRS (AA, negative) 19th September, Scope (AA-, Stable) 26th September, Moody's (Aa3, Stable) 24th October, S&P (AA-, Negative) 28th November.
      • If Fitch were to downgrade on the 12th, after the vote, then this would push French assets close to the point at which some funds would be forced to divest. Fitch last updated on March 14th, highlighting high levels of debt and a poor record of fiscal consolidation as points of weakness, adding the negative outlook is reflective of significant fiscal risks. While the confidence vote raises the odds of a downgrade, it is worth noting that Fitch in March expected new elections to occur in H2-2025, so it remains to be seen how much of this has already been 'priced' by the agency.
      • However, on the flip side, the agency highlighted a “failure to implement a medium-term fiscal consolidation plan...” as a factor that could spur negative rating action.
      • As a reminder, the EU's Stability and Growth Pact requires member nations to have deficits equal/less than 3% of GDP and public debt to a maximum of 60% of GDP; France comes in at around 5.8% and over 100% respectively. Though, the Commission has been and is expected to continue to be flexible with the rules, focusing primarily on the medium-term trajectory and credibility of fiscal plans.

      WHAT HAPPENS IF THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT FALLS?

      For Bayrou to survive, he needs to get the approval of a majority of those votes cast. Given that the groups that support the government represent just 210 seats out of 574 currently occupied (there are three vacant seats at the moment), Bayrou would need well over 100 abstentions in order to survive, assuming all members of those parties that support the government vote in his favor.

      If Bayrou loses the vote, Macron’s options include naming a new premier or dissolving the lower house and calling early elections, which aides have said is not in the plans for now. Macron has repeatedly insisted he wouldn’t resign, as some parties have demanded.

      If Macron were to name a new prime minister, it would leave unanswered the question of how the government passes an unpopular budget, which brought down the previous premier, Michel Barnier, last year. The context underscores the sudden return of France’s fiscal concerns to the forefront of investors’ attention at a time when European neighbors such as Italy are making comparative progress in taming deficits.

      As Bloomberg's Michael Msika and Julien Ponthus detail below, French assets are set for long-lasting underperformance as the country’s unstable politics keep investors at bay.

      Since Prime Minister François Bayrou called a vote of confidence on Aug. 25, the CAC 40 Index has fallen more than a broad European stock benchmark. The extra yield investors demand to hold French 10-year government bonds over German bunds has surged. Even so, French assets aren’t yet pricing the instability that can unfold over the coming weeks or months.

      “We’re not expecting for now a sudden tipping point by which bonds and stocks would suddenly collapse,” says Raphael Thuin, head of capital markets strategies at Tikehau Capital.

      “It’s rather about pricing a potentially progressive and long-lasting decline. The feedback we get from our clients is that they’re getting used to the idea that there’s a durable risk premium being attached to France.”

      France’s inability to fix its public finances has led to three governments in little more than a year, and there’s no sign that a fourth will fare any better.

      So investors may be left facing another deadlock over the budget for months to come, the prospect of another snap parliamentary election and even persistent calls for President Emmanuel Macron to resign.

      “The French equity market may be too optimistic about the political outcomes,” say Citi strategists led by Beata Manthey, who downgraded the country’s stocks to neutral at the end of August.

      “Potential election would in our view imply about 5% lower equity market valuations. Combined with the fact that French equities tend to be more volatile than peers’ around elections, this could be a reason to expect additional choppiness.”

      While the CAC 40 generates only 20% of revenues domestically, investors have been applying a discount to the benchmark since the snap elections last year and may continue to stay away on a relative basis. Sectors with the highest levels of local revenue reliance are telecoms, financials, and real estate, while technology, materials and health care are more internationally facing.

      Banks are at the forefront of investor worries, given their exposure to government bonds.

      Citi analysts note that key concerns include a higher cost of equity, increased funding costs and potential populist measures, but say that these fears remain “overblown” for now.

      Defense stocks should also be watched, they add. While French defense spending will most likely trend upward in 2025 and 2026, things might become more difficult in the medium term out to 2030.

      Construction and logistics companies like Vinci and Eiffage, residential real-estate developer Nexity and nursing-home operators Emeis and Clariane have also suffered recent bouts of volatility.

      The discount on French assets is likely to be validated in the event of Bayrou’s ouster, because any new government will have to dial back his proposed budget cuts. The premier failed to find a majority to back his plan for €44 billion of spending reductions and tax hikes, with the goal of narrowing France’s 2026 deficit to 4.6% of economic output from an expected 5.4% this year.

      The yield on France’s 10-year government bond climbed to almost 3.6%, threatening to surpass that of Italy, after Bayrou called the vote, though it has since receded to about 3.44%.

      The yield premium on French bonds over bunds has risen to almost 80 basis points, roughly 10 basis points higher than prior to Bayrou’s political gamble.

      Tension in the bond markets threatens to spill over to stocks, because higher benchmark yields mean higher borrowing costs, especially for smaller, indebted companies, says Thomas Helaine, head of equity sales at TP ICAP Europe.

      That in return reduces the money available for capital spending and growth, he said, and as a result, investors are looking to other markets.

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 14:45

      Trump: European Leaders Will Return This Week To Discuss Russia–Ukraine War

      Trump: European Leaders Will Return This Week To Discuss Russia–Ukraine War

      Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,

      President Donald Trump announced on Sunday that European leaders would return to the United States in the coming days to discuss the administration’s ongoing efforts to end the Russia–Ukraine War.

      Speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews after a quick visit to New York, Trump said that leaders would be coming to the White House “individually” to meet with him. He didn’t provide specifics on who would be visiting but suggested that the meetings would be held across Monday and Tuesday.

      Discussing the ongoing Russia–Ukrainian conflict, Trump said he was “not happy” about the current state of negotiations, Russia, or “anything having to do with that war.”

      “I’m not happy. I’m not happy about the whole situation,” he said. He said that the two Eastern European nations were losing, “between Ukraine and Russia, 7,000 soldiers every single week. It’s such a horrible waste of humanity. So no, I am not thrilled with what’s happening.”

      Pursuing an end to the conflict—which began with Russia’s invasion of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014, and escalated following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine’s mainland in February 2022—was a pillar of Trump’s 2024 campaign.

      Speaking to reporters, Trump expressed confidence that the conflict “is going to get settled.”

      Since his first term, Trump has sought to negotiate peaceful resolutions to international conflicts. He admitted that he had thought the Eastern European conflict “would have been maybe the easiest one to settle of all. But with war, you never know what you’re getting.”

      Nevertheless, Trump reiterated, “I believe we’re going to get it settled.”

      Across August, Trump has escalated his efforts to bring an end to the conflict.

      On Aug. 16, Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska to discuss an end to the conflict.

      Though Putin announced some broad areas of agreement between the two superpowers, no formal agreement was reached.

      “There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” Trump said at the time. He added, “We didn’t get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there.”

      The two leaders did not mention a cease-fire or other key elements of negotiations, such as security guarantees for Ukraine or further U.S. sanctions on Russia and its supporters.

      When later asked what key points the two sides disagreed on, Trump declined to say.

      A few days later, Trump hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and a contingent of other European leaders at the White House.

      At the time, Zelenskyy said that Ukraine was ready to bring an end to the war and wanted a face-to-face meeting with Putin.

      He said such meetings are the only way to move forward with the “complicated and painful issues” the discussions will entail.

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 14:40

      Appeals Court Upholds E. Jean Carroll's $83.3 Million Judgment Against Trump

      Appeals Court Upholds E. Jean Carroll's $83.3 Million Judgment Against Trump

      Via Headline USA,

      A federal appeals court has upheld a civil jury’s finding that President Donald Trump must pay $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll for his repeated social media attacks against the longtime advice columnist after she accused him of sexual assault - even though a jury ruled that she lied about her rape allegations.

      Carroll, whose advice column ran in the women’s magazine Elle from 1993 to 2019, has reportedly accused at least six prior men of raping her, including former CBS President Les Moonves.

      Her bizarre social-media history also included posts making light of sexual trauma and even asking her followers if they found Trump sexually attractive.

      Trump was prevented from submitting that evidence in his trial.

      Despite her dubious track record, on Monday the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump’s appeal of the defamation award, finding that the “jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable.”

      Trump had argued that he should not have to pay the sum as a result of a Supreme Court decision expanding presidential immunity.

      His lawyers had asked for a new trial.

      A civil jury in Manhattan issued the $88.3 million award last year following a trial that centered on Trump’s repeated social media attacks against Carroll over her claims that he sexually assaulted her in a Manhattan department store in 1996.

      That award followed a separate trial, in which Trump was found liable for sexually abusing Carroll and ordered to pay $5 million.

      That award was upheld by an appeals court last December.

      In a memoir, and again at a 2023 trial, Carroll described how a chance encounter with Trump at Bergdorf Goodman’s Fifth Avenue in 1996 started with the two flirting as they shopped, then ended with a violent struggle inside a dressing room.

      Carroll said Trump slammed her against a dressing room wall, pulled down her tights and forced himself on her.

      A jury found Trump liable for sexual assault, but concluded he hadn’t committed rape, as defined under New York law.

      Trump repeatedly denied that the encounter took place and accused Carroll of making it up to help sell her book.

      He also said that Carroll was “not my type.”

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 13:20

      GM CEO Mary Barra Sells 40% Of Stock As EV Slowdown Pauses Cadillac Lyriq, Vistiq Production 

      GM CEO Mary Barra Sells 40% Of Stock As EV Slowdown Pauses Cadillac Lyriq, Vistiq Production 

      A General Motors spokesperson confirmed to the Detroit Free Press that CEO Mary Barra sold 994,863 shares last month, valued at roughly $35.4 million. The sale accounted for 40% of Barra's personal stake in the struggling legacy automaker, which is facing a slowdown in electric vehicle sales.

      Barra's fire sale, one of her largest ever, included shares linked to performance rewards dating back to 2011, plus a wind-down of her estate-planning trust. It should be noted that these sales occurred under her 10B5-1 plan. 

      Here's the breakdown (view Form 4 here) of the selling:

      • Sold 297,000 shares at an average price of $58.24, making up to roughly $17.3 million.

      • Sold 235,000 in money options at a strike price of $39, adding up to roughly $4.5 million.

      • Sold 375,024 in the money options with a strike price of $35.49, adding up to roughly $8.5 million.

      • Sold 87,839 shares from the annuity trust priced at $58.13, making roughly $5.1 million.

      The Detroit Free Press cited Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, who said Barra's stock sale should not be viewed as alarming. 

      "We are not concerned about this, and it's about shares that hit some triggers," Ives said, adding, "Barra remains a key part of the GM's success, and we do not view this as a needle mover."

      Barra's selling raises a new question: What does that say about GM's future?

      Bloomberg data shows that Barra's stock sales began in the summer of 2024 and have continued ever since, reducing her total position to 2018 levels. Barra became CEO in January 2014.  

      The selling comes as the Detroit Free Press announced in recent days that GM's Spring Hill Assembly plant in Tennessee will experience several weeks of downtime. The plant makes the Cadillac Lyriq SUV and Vistiq. 

      Additionally, GM's Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City, Kansas, and its CAMI Assembly Plant line in Ingersoll, Ontario, are adjusting production plans.

      "General Motors is making strategic production adjustments in alignment with expected slower EV industry growth and customer demand by leveraging our flexible ICE and EV manufacturing footprint," GM spokesman Kevin Kelly told Detroit Free Press last week. 

      Sales are slowing.

      Only time will tell what 17 months of selling stock means for the future of GM's leadership.

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 13:00

      Why Diversification Is Failing In The Age Of Passive Investing

      Why Diversification Is Failing In The Age Of Passive Investing

      Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

      Diversification has been the backbone of “buy and hold” strategies for the last few decades. It was a boon to financial advisors who couldn’t actively manage portfolios, and it created a massive Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) industry that allowed for even further simplification of investing. The message was basic: “Buy a basket of assets, dollar cost average, and given enough time, you will grow your wealth.”

      But where did that marketing revolution come from? Based on the premise of index investing, it created massive firms like Vanguard, Fidelity, BlackRock, and others. For that answer, we need to go back in time to 1952. Then, Harry Markowitz revolutionized investment strategy with his portfolio choice theory. His work, for which he received a Nobel Prize, gave rise to what we now know as Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), which proposed that the best portfolios don’t focus on individual securities but on how groups of assets interact.

      The goal was to combine uncorrelated assets to reduce overall volatility while optimizing returns. This model encouraged investors to spread risk through diversification. Critically, it assumes that assets wouldn’t all move together in times of stress. This theory served as the bedrock of portfolio construction for decades, especially for institutional investors. The strategy worked well before the turn of the century, when sectors rotated leadership and assets moved independently based on distinct economic drivers. Back then, diversification across asset classes, sectors, and geographies was a reliable way to reduce portfolio risk.

      However, over the last 15 years, following the financial crisis, the investing environment has changed. Monetary and fiscal interventions, global central bank interest rate policies, the maturity of algorithmic and computerized trading strategies, and concentration have reduced diversification’s value. As shown, any portfolio “diversified” between large, mid, and small-cap stocks, international and emerging markets, real estate, and gold, has significantly underperformed being invested solely in the S&P 500 index. Furthermore, in times of crisis, like 2020, the diversification failed to protect investors from the downturn as correlations went to “1.”

      The reality is that markets have changed.

      The assumptions that supported MPT, uncorrelated assets, stable relationships, and rational price behavior, have eroded. Central banks have injected liquidity, distorted yields, and suppressed volatility. Meanwhile, passive investing has reshaped how money flows into stocks.

      The basic premise of diversification is under pressure from structural shifts that Markowitz could not have anticipated.

      Passive Investing’s Impact on Market Structure

      Passive investing has grown from a niche strategy into the dominant force in equity markets. Index funds and ETFs now account for over half of U.S. equity ownership. These vehicles allocate capital based on market capitalization, not valuation, fundamentals, or business quality. As more money flows into these funds, the largest companies receive the lion’s share of new capital. That’s created a powerful feedback loop, where price drives flows, and flows drive price.

      This shift has radically changed the effectiveness of diversification. Investors who think they’re diversified across multiple ETFs often have overlapping exposure to the same few mega-cap names. For example, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia are top holdings in technology ETFs, dividend funds, and large-cap growth portfolios. In the U.S., there are roughly 4000 ETFs, and 771, approximately 20%, own Apple. Therefore, if you own an S&P index fund, a Nasdaq index ETF, and a technology-focused ETF, you have multiple holdings of the same companies. This overlap increases portfolio risk and concentration. What looks like diversification is often just duplicated exposure dressed up as balance.

      As noted in “The Bull Market Is Alive And Well,” the top 10 stocks have a hefty weighting in the S&P 500 index, which absorbs $0.36 of every dollar invested. Furthermore, the top 10 stocks impact the S&P 500 index the same as the bottom 440 stocks combined.

      Furthermore, the top ten stocks in the S&P 500 now account for more than 70 percent of the index’s return. These names dominate the performance of most portfolios, even those that appear broad on the surface. As passive flows continue to distort market mechanics, the ability of traditional diversification to reduce risk has declined. Assets that once behaved independently now rise and fall together, leaving portfolios more vulnerable when markets correct.

      But that is where we find the demise of Modern Portfolio Theory, which assumes that asset classes will not move in perfect unison. Historically, this was true. Sector correlations typically ranged between 0.3 and 0.6, allowing diversification to smooth out returns. When one part of the market fell, others could rise or stay flat. That dynamic gave portfolios resilience. But today, those correlations are breaking down. During market stress, correlations spike as high as 0.9. Nearly every asset class sells off together, erasing the protective benefit of diversification.

      This shift is driven by the rise of passive ownership, which has increased the linkage between stocks, sectors, and even asset classes. Academic research from INSEAD and UC Irvine confirms that companies with high passive ownership become more volatile and exhibit stronger co-movement, especially during sell-offs. Central bank interventions have added another layer of distortion by suppressing price discovery and inflating asset prices indiscriminately. Liquidity flows, not fundamentals, now drive much of market behavior.

      Even portfolios designed to be “all-weather” or “risk-parity” have failed to deliver protection during sharp downturns. Diversification fails when everything is tied to the same flows and narratives. The illusion of balance breaks down exactly when it is most needed. This environment has made it harder to rely on traditional asset allocation strategies.

      Therefore, given this change to market dynamics, investors must now think differently about managing risk.

      New Approaches to Diversification in a Concentrated Market

      Yes, diversification still matters. In fact, it matters more now than ever. While the traditional benefits of diversification have weakened due to high correlations and market concentration, the need to reduce risk remains unchanged. The objective is not to eliminate volatility, but to manage it intelligently. That means ensuring portfolios can withstand market downturns while still participating in upside when leadership changes or new trends emerge.

      Surface-level diversification is no longer enough in a market increasingly driven by passive flows and dominated by a few mega-cap names. Owning multiple funds or asset classes does not guarantee protection if the underlying exposures overlap. Investors must go deeper and look beyond labels and into the actual drivers of risk and return. Here are seven strategies to help achieve more effective diversification in today’s environment:

      1. Limit Overlap Across Holdings: To reduce concentration risk in your portfolio, ensure you limit duplicate positions across your funds.

      2. Prioritize High-Conviction, Quality Holdings: Reduce broad exposure in favor of companies with consistent earnings, low debt, and durable competitive advantages. Quality stocks tend to be more resilient across market cycles.

      3. Allocate by Investment Factors, Not Just Sectors: Diversify based on factors like value, size, momentum, and low volatility. These traits respond differently to economic conditions, creating more effective diversification than sector spreads alone.

      4. Don’t Forget About Cash: When uncertain markets arrive, remember the value of cash as a hedge against volatility risk.

      5. Use Active Management Where It Adds Value: Tactical funds or active managers can navigate around crowded trades and avoid the systematic exposures built into passive indexes.

      6. Incorporate Alternative Allocation Models: Explore risk-based strategies like Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP), which adapt to changing correlations and distribute risk more evenly than traditional mean-variance approaches.

      7. Monitor Correlations Over Time: Correlations are dynamic, especially in periods of stress. Review your portfolio regularly to ensure your holdings are not moving in lockstep when it matters most.

      Each of these steps is designed to restore the core purpose of diversification: risk control without sacrificing the opportunity for return.

      In a market where broad ownership no longer guarantees safety, discipline, and deeper analysis make the difference.

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:40

      Outlook For Job Seekers Suddenly Craters To Record Low Amid Steady Inflation Expectations, NY Fed Finds

      Outlook For Job Seekers Suddenly Craters To Record Low Amid Steady Inflation Expectations, NY Fed Finds

      After sliding every month since April, short-term inflation expectations (inside a 1 year horizon) as polled by the Ny Fed survey of consumer expectations appear to have bottomed and after rising modestly in July from 3.0% to 3.1%, rose again in August, this time to 3.2%. At the same time, inflation expectations were They were unchanged for the 3rd consecutive month at the three-year horizon at 3.0%, and also unchanged at 2.9% for the five-year-ahead horizon (median inflation uncertainty, or the uncertainty expressed regarding future inflation outcomes, increased at the one- and three-year-ahead horizons and declined at the five-year-ahead horizon.)

      One place where consumers may be disappointed is that median home price growth expectations remained unchanged for the third consecutive month at 3.0%. This series has been moving in a narrow range between 3.0% and 3.3% since August 2023. However, as recent data has shown, home price growth is stalling fast, and at this rate will turn negative within a month or two at which point home price expectations will reprice dramatically.

      What is curious is what while short-term inflation expectations rose fractionally, the declined across the board when disaggregated by various components. to wit: median year-ahead commodity price change expectations declined by 0.9% points for the cost of college education to 7.8%, by 1.0% point for rent to 6.0%, and by 0.4 percentage point for the cost of medical care to 8.8%. Median year-ahead price change expectations remained unchanged for gas (3.9%) and food (5.5%) for the third consecutive month.

      Turning to household finance expectations, the median expected growth in household income remained unchanged for the second consecutive month at 2.9% in August, equaling its 12-month trailing average. Median household spending growth expectations increased by 0.1 percentage point to 5.0%. The series has been moving in a range between 4.8% and 5.2% since February 2025.

      Perceptions of credit access compared to a year ago improved with a smaller share of households reporting it is harder to get credit. Expectations for future credit availability deteriorated somewhat, with a smaller share of respondents expecting it will be easier to obtain credit in the year ahead.

      While the average perceived probability of missing a minimum debt payment over the next three months increased by 0.8% to 13.1%, it remained below its 12-month trailing average of 13.5%. 

      Somewhat amusingly, median year-ahead expected growth in government debt declined by 2.5% points to 6.6%. Spoiler alert: this will not happen. What also will not happen is that average interest rates on savings accounts will rise - on the contrary, once the Fed starts cutting rates in 2 weeks, expect much lower rates - but that didn't stop 24.3% of respondents, up 0.7% on th month, from expecting that saving accounts will be higher in 12 months.

      On the flip side, perceptions about households’ current financial situations compared to a year ago worsened with a larger share of households reporting a worse financial situation and a smaller share of households reporting a better financial situation. Year-ahead expectations about households’ financial situations became more dispersed. A larger share of households are expecting a worse financial situation, and an equally larger share of households are expecting a better financial situation in one year from now. 

      And yet despite the apparent deterioration in outlook, at least households can still cling to hopes for higher stock prices: the mean perceived probability that US stock prices will be higher 12 months from now increased by 0.6 percentage point to 38.9%.

      While the latest inflation and household finance readings were relatively tame the same can not be said for expectations about the Labor Market. Here, the most notable shift came from responses by those who lose a job now, and say that the prospects of finding new employment within three months dropped by almost 6 percentage points in August to the lowest reading since the New York Fed began asking the question in 2013. That’s also the sharpest downturn in one month since the pandemic. Specifically, the perceived probability of finding a job if one’s current job was lost fell markedly by 5.8 ppt to 44.9 percent, the lowest reading since the start of the series in June 2013.

      The darkening outlook for job seekers was broad-based across age, education and income groups, the New York Fed said. Yet it was most pronounced for those with a high school diploma as their highest level of education.

      A bit less dramatic, but tied to that, is that the mean perceived probability of losing one’s job in the next 12 months ticked up by 0.1% point to 14.5%. The reading is above the series’ 12-month trailing average of 14.0%. The mean probability of leaving one’s job voluntarily in the next 12 months decreased by 0.1% point to 18.9%, remaining slightly below its 12-month trailing average of 19.0%.

      Additionally, mean unemployment expectations, or the mean probability that the U.S. unemployment rate will be higher one year from now, increased by 1.7 ppt to 39.1% which however is well below the recent April highs of 44.1%. 

      The results followed a dismal employment report last Friday showing firms added just 22,000 net new positions in August. Revisions also revealed that companies shed workers in June. The unemployment moved up to 4.3%, and cemented the odds of a 25bps rate cut in two weeks.

      Fed officials say concerns are shifting from the inflation risks posed by tariffs to weakness in the job market. Many businesses have delayed price increases after stocking up on inventory at the beginning of the year.

      And sure enough, the latest NY Fed survey confirms that while fears of runaway inflation expectations are now long gone (except perhaps a dozen or so blue haired Karens which UMich polls relentless month after month), the labor market continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace, and absent a jumbo rate cut soon, the deterioration will be sufficient to trigger a recession. 

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:20

      Putin Doesn't Seem Worried As EU's 19th Sanctions Package Would Hit Russian Banks, Oil

      Putin Doesn't Seem Worried As EU's 19th Sanctions Package Would Hit Russian Banks, Oil

      The United States, Europe and Ukraine are still pinning their hopes on witnessing a Russian economic "collapse" that theoretically will hasten a desperate Putin to the negotiating table, where he'll make significant compromise.

      That's according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a Meet the Press interview Sunday. He said: "We are prepared to increase pressure on Russia, but we need our partners in Europe to follow."

      Urging Europe to act more aggressively, he said, "We are talking about what the two, the EU and the U.S., do together. But we need our European partners to follow us."

      At this moment the European Union is considering a new round of sanctions targeting several Russian banks and energy firms - which would mark its 19th package. The newest round would take aim at Russia’s payment and credit card networks, cryptocurrency exchanges, as well as impose additional restrictions on its oil trade. In total it would target about half a dozen Russian banks and energy companies.

      The action is expected to be coordinated, after EU representatives meet this week in Washington with Trump admin officials. Have nearly twenty rounds of sanctions really put the squeeze and hurt on Russia, enough to impact Putin's war aims? So far, the evidence has not been compelling.

      With each new round of sanctions going back to 2022, it remains the same mantra from people like European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who previewed starting early last month, "We have adopted 18 packages so far, and we are advancing preparation for the 19th. This package will be forthcoming in early September."

      She reasoned, "We need to prepare the 19th package so that Russia sees that we are serious. We must continue to limit Russia’s potential." The EU's position is that the sanctions pressure will eventually "President Putin to the negotiation table."

      The state of the battlefield in eastern Ukraine strongly suggests that the Kremlin could care less if Europe and the US are 'serious' - as Russian forces have kept slowly advancing piecemeal, and even last month penetrated into the central oblast of Dnipropetrovsk. This also comes off Putin's time in Beijing, which sent a message to the world doubling down on trade commitments in defiance of Washington, also involving India.

      As far as another round of major sanctions, it's looking like President Trump will probably pull the trigger, given events like Sunday's record-breaking drone and missile attack on Kiev and across Ukraine will only ramp up the pressure on him to act, amid the urgings of hawks. He might be more interested in salvaging bilateral US-Russia ties, however. Certainly the Russians have had a favorable approach to this.

      Germany's Deutsche Welle reviews:

      • Russia attacks with 805 drones and 13 missiles, most of which were intercepted, according to Ukraine's Air Force
      • Strikes hit residential areas in Kyiv, killing at least two people, and set fire to one of the main government buildings
      • Ukraine's president and prime minister continue to urge global allies to ramp up pressure on Russia by strengthening sanctions against country

      That attack marked the first time that high level 'decision-making centers' of the government were attacked, as the cabinet of ministers building was set a blaze, which is not far from Zelensky's office.

      There remains no forward movement on getting Putin and Zelensky into top level negotiations, as Trump has sought, and Zelensky even said he won't go the the capital of "that terrorist" Putin. Such rhetoric will ensure that a meeting doesn't happen, and Zelensky and Europe seem content with this - even as untold numbers continue dying by the day on the eastern battlefield.

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 11:40

      Trial Of Trump Assassination Attempt Suspect Begins: What To Know

      Trial Of Trump Assassination Attempt Suspect Begins: What To Know

      Authored by Jacob Burg via The Epoch Times,

      Ryan Routh, the man accused of trying to assassinate President Donald Trump last year at his South Florida golf course, is set to go on trial in federal court on Sept. 8.

      In September 2024, Routh, 59, allegedly entered the grounds of Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, armed with a semiautomatic rifle. Prosecutors allege that Routh pointed the rifle barrel at a U.S. Secret Service agent while targeting Trump, who was then the Republican presidential candidate.

      Routh has pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, including attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer, and multiple firearm violations.

      Here’s what to know about the trial of the suspect in the second Trump assassination attempt, set to begin on Sept. 8.

      Routh Will Represent Himself

      U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, the same judge who presided over and tossed out Trump’s classified documents case last year, is also handling Routh’s case in Fort Pierce, Florida.

      Cannon approved Routh’s request to represent himself at trial during a hearing in July.

      Routh requested to represent himself at trial in a June 29 letter to Cannon, claiming that he and his lawyers are “a million miles apart” and that they refused to answer his questions.

      He also floated the idea of being used in a prisoner exchange with Iran, China, North Korea, or Russia.

      “I could die being of some use and save all this court mess, but no one acts; perhaps you have the power to trade me away,” Routh wrote.

      The suspect’s defense counsel, including attorney Kristy Militello, filed a motion on July 23 to terminate representation, saying her “attorney-client relationship” with Routh was “irreconcilably broken.”

      Cannon told the defense attorneys that they must remain as standby counsel.

      Routh Given Clear Instructions on Court Conduct

      During a hearing on Sept. 2, Cannon told Routh that he cannot make any sudden movements while representing himself at trial. While he will be allowed to use a podium while questioning witnesses or speaking to the jury, he will not have free rein in the courtroom, Cannon said.

      “If you make any sudden movements, marshals will take decisive and quick action to respond,” Cannon said.

      The judge also said that Routh will be dressed in professional business attire for the duration of the trial.

      Week one of the trial will begin with jury selection, which is expected to last three days, during which attorneys will question three sets of 60 prospective jurors. Twelve jurors and four alternates must be found before the trial begins. Opening statements will begin on Sept. 11, with prosecutors slated to start presenting their evidence afterward.

      While the court has designated four weeks for the trial, attorneys expect it to end sooner.

      Defense, Prosecution Plans for Trial

      In a court filing ahead of a Sept. 2 hearing, Routh said he wanted to subpoena Trump himself, while suggesting a “beatdown session would be more fun and entertaining for everyone.” He also used a list of insults for Trump, calling the president a “baboon.”

      Routh requested Cannon subpoena “every single person that had something negative to say about Ryan Routh” in another filing on the same day.

      “Please put them on the stand under oath and lets see who lies, themor [sic] the FBI,” Routh wrote.

      In response, Cannon denied Routh’s new witness requests after approving four previously, and said nothing the defendant has written suggests a “subpoena to President Trump would be relevant or necessary to prepare an adequate defense.” Routh also tried to subpoena a former lover, alleging her romantic experience with him “evidences his purported peacefulness, gentleness, and nonviolence.”

      Cannon referred to the request as a “farce to bring about obviously ludicrous and absurd results in a court proceeding.”

      The judge on Sept. 2 also unsealed the prosecution’s 33-page list of exhibits, which may be introduced as evidence during Routh’s trial. The list says that prosecutors possess photos of Routh holding the same model of semiautomatic rifle that was found at Trump’s golf club in September 2024, when the assassination attempt occurred.

      The list also contains electronic messages sent from a cellphone that law enforcement found in Routh’s car on the day of the attempt. In one that was dated two months prior to his arrest, Routh allegedly requests a “missile launcher.” The document also accuses Routh of sending a message in August 2024 seeking “help ensuring that [Trump] does not get elected.”

      In that message, Routh allegedly offered to pay an unnamed person to track the location of Trump’s airplane with flight tracking apps.

      The exhibit list also references a message about an electronic “chat about sniper concealment” during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and internet searches for how long gunpowder sticks to clothing and for responses by the U.S. Secret Service to assassination plots.

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 11:20

      Is It Simply "Too Late" To Fix?

      Is It Simply "Too Late" To Fix?

      By Benjamin Picton, Rabobank senior strategist

      US bond yields dumped on Friday as the August US payrolls report confirmed a weakening labor market. Yields on US 10s finished the session 8.5bps lower at 4.08%, and 10-year sovereign yields in Australia and New Zealand are taking the lead this morning, currently down 5 and 4.5bps respectively.

      OIS futures are now pricing a Fed rate cut in September as a virtual fait accompli, with at least one subsequent cut (almost two) priced in for the remainder of 2025 (and 10% odds of a 50bps rate cut). Nevertheless, US stocks closed Friday lower with the duration exposed NASDAQ performing best and the ‘earnings-today’ Dow Jones faring worst to end the session 0.48% lower.

      Gold prices are rising again in early trade this morning after pumping more than 4% last week to reset all-time-highs. The prospect of lower real rates is doubtless a driver, as the US front-end comes under pressure following the soft payrolls report and the market looks ahead to CPI figures later this week that could confirm the stagflation scenario that Jerome Powell said he couldn’t see as recently as last year.

      5y5y inflation swaps in the US have been rising since Liberation Day back in April, while 2-year treasury yields have been falling since the middle of May. Politicization of the Fed is undoubtedly a factor in the unusual price action. Short-end nominal yields dropped substantially after Adriana Kugler announced on August 1st that she was stepping down as a Fed Governor, and dropped again after Trump’s August 21st announcement that he was firing Lisa Cook. In both instances, long-end real yields remained comparatively well supported, creating an alligator-jaw effect on the graph.

      Trump further upped the ante in his campaign to assert control over monetary policy late last week. Following the release of the poor payrolls data (which followed poor reads on the ADP report, the JOLTS report and the weekly jobless claims report) he ‘Truthed’ that Jerome ‘Too Late’ Powell should have cut rates a long ago and also nominated a shortlist of Kevin Warsh, Kevin Hassett and Christopher Waller as potential successors to Jerome Powell as Fed Chair. Naturally, all three have shown an inclination to cut the Fed Funds rate.

      Events in other markets are also perhaps conducive to ideas of structurally higher borrowing costs at the long end of the curve. Firstly, Japan’s PM Ishiba has just announced that he will be stepping down. Ishiba is a fiscal hawk and while there is no clarity yet over a successor, it is likely that whoever takes over would be less inclined toward budget restraint and less supportive of tighter monetary policy from the BOJ. Sanae Takaichi, who finished second to Ishiba in a previous LDP leadership runoff, favours a more stimulatory fiscal stance and could be in the mix to become the new Premier.

      In a similar fashion, France’s PM Bayrou faces a confidence vote later today where he is likely to lose his job. Bayrou has proposed EUR 44bn of austerity measures over the next 12 months in a bid to repair France’s parlous public finances, but faces staunch opposition on both the left and right to his plans. If Bayrou loses the vote (which seems likely), President Macron could either appoint a new Prime Minister, dissolve the national assembly and call fresh elections, or step down himself. The latter is highly unlikely, and the second course risks an even less palatable composition of parliament. We believe that the most likely course is that Macron will appoint a new Prime Minister and plans for fiscal retrenchment will be necessarily curtailed by the unfriendly operating environment. Our full analysis is available here.

      And finally, the UK lost its deputy PM (who also happened to be the housing minister) late last week when news emerged that Angela Rayner had underpaid taxes on the purchase of a seaside flat, contravening the ministerial code of conduct in the process. PM Starmer has announced a comprehensive cabinet reshuffle but was at pains to stress that beleaguered Chancellor Rachel Reeves would be remaining in her current position in a bid to calm the already jittery gilts market.

      30-year gilt yields reached their highest levels since 1998 last week as markets lost confidence in the trajectory of the UK fiscal position. Rising yields and projected productivity downgrades have more than wiped out the ‘fiscal headroom’ that Reeves left for herself at her last budget and now puts her in the position of having to find tens of billions of pounds worth of savings measures that are almost certain to be opposed by her own backbench.

      Failure to pass savings measures will likely push gilt yields even higher, highlighting the economic doom loop that the UK now finds itself in as the Guardian reports senior Labour Party figures helpfully advising Keir Starmer to “stop making mistakes.” Keep in mind that the UK (and France!) also needs to find some money to re-arm on the off chance that they might have to fight the Russians.

      So, while front end yields are sinking today on hopes of easier money from central banks, the story at the long end is a little more complicated. Fixing bloated fiscal positions without clobbering the economy and simultaneously finding ways to finance spending priorities has become a policy paradox. Is it simply ‘too late’ to fix? Or can out of the box economic thinking still find a solution?

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 11:00

      Americans Sour On Capitalism As Democrats Go All-In On Socialism: Survey

      Americans Sour On Capitalism As Democrats Go All-In On Socialism: Survey

      A new Gallup survey reveals that Americans' positive perception of capitalism has slipped to 54%, the lowest level since the poll began in 2010 and down from 60% in 2021. Meanwhile, views of socialism remain steady at around 39%, though partisan divides are widening, with two-thirds of Democrats viewing socialism favorably.

      This comes as the next generation of Democratic politicians grows more radical than ever, calling for a socialist reconstruction of America, with some of these unhinged politicians openly embracing Marxism.

      Democrats and independents have grown increasingly skeptical of capitalism. For the first time, fewer than half of Democrats (42%) view the economic system that has allowed America to become a superpower as favorable. Republicans' views remain unchanged, with three-quarters holding a favorable opinion.

      Not surprisingly, two-thirds of Democrats view socialism favorably, up from 50% in 2010.

      This reflects an alarming shift within the party as it embraces far-left progressive policies, with an increasing number of Democratic leaders openly leaning toward Marxism. Republicans, by contrast, remain broadly skeptical of socialism, mindful of the lessons from the fall of the Berlin Wall decades ago.

      One thing voters agree on: positive views of mega corporations continue to slide over a multi-decade period to a record low. 

      Sixty percent of Republicans, 36% of independents, and 17% of Democrats view mega corporations positively. 

      "Americans overall continue to be skeptical of socialism, but Democrats are the exception," Gallup wrote in the report, adding, "Since 2016, more Democrats have held positive views of socialism than of capitalism, with the gap expanding to 24 points today." 

      Gallup noted, "Democrats' more positive views of socialism occur at a time when many high-profile Democratic officials — most notably, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as well as New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani — have identified themselves as Democratic socialists and advocated policies calling for a significantly expanded government role in economic matters." 

      The takeaway from the new survey confirms our reporting: Democrats have gone off the deep end. Rather than returning to the center of the political aisle, they've chosen to double and even triple down on all things woke and now openly embrace socialism. Some in the party are even cheerleading Marxism while calling for the collapse of capitalism and America.

      This type of revolutionary behavior by Democrats is not tolerated by President Trump, who campaigned against socialism in 2024, often declaring that "America will never be a socialist country." 

      Tyler Durden Mon, 09/08/2025 - 10:40

      Pages