Zero Hedge

John Brennan Lawyers Confirm Their Client Is A "Target" Of A Grand Jury Investigation

John Brennan Lawyers Confirm Their Client Is A "Target" Of A Grand Jury Investigation

Authored by Sundance via The Last Refuge,

Lawfare lawyer Kenneth Wainstein representing former CIA Director John Brennan confirmed in a proactive litigation letter to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, their client is a “target” of a grand jury investigation.

The word “target” is important here, because the letter specifically outlines how Brennan has received subpoenas for documents and information surrounding his construct of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.

The letter notes that prosecutors from the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Jason Reding Quiñones, have advised Mr. Brennan that he is “a target” of a grand jury investigation.

[SOURCE]

The letter by is by Mr. Kenneth Wainstein, a partner in Mayer/Brown law firm, Washington DC, who served in the administrations of Presidents George W. Bush and Joseph R. Biden Jr., and he describes a “concocted case” and “politically motivated and fact-free criminal investigation.”

Wainstein is seeking proactive intervention by Chief Judge Altonaga to block U.S. Attorney Quinones from seeking jurisdiction in the Fort Pierce Division, the court with jurisdiction over the Mar-a-Lago raid, led by Judge Aileen Cannon.

I strongly urge everyone interested to READ THE ENTIRE LETTER to understand why I shared prior warnings about the nonsense ramblings of perhaps well-intentioned voices who will create problems for this case against Brennan if it is to continue.

Pay attention to the footnotes being cited by Brennan’s lawyers as they begin to pull in some of the commentary by voices who have publicly given opinion about the overall Trump targeting operation.  Mike Davis name appears frequently in this letter, as the Brennan defense team begins to frame the conspiratorial nature of some claims against their client.

In essence, the Brennan legal team are attempting to refute the evidence by pointing to the blanket of some crazy commentary that covers it. This is exactly what I have been cautioning about {SEE HERE}.

U.S Attorney Quinones already faces an uphill battle, because John Durham already reviewed the ICA origination as part of his investigation – but Durham never prosecuted anyone inside government.

This year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a tranche of background information, [114 pages of information], showing how the Obama administration intentionally and with great purpose fabricated the Russia election interference story. DNI Tulsi Gabbard Press Release Here – Files Containing Evidence Here

What the evidence shows is a focused targeting operation intended to fabricate a false premise by the United States Intelligence Community, centered around a fraudulent CIA analysis (ICA) led by John Brennan, and organized through the Office of former DNI James Clapper.  The op was green-lighted by Barack Obama as a way to impede the agenda of incoming President Donald Trump.  All three branches of government eventually collaborated on the scheme.

Lawyers for John Brennan are now seeking to proactively undermine the grand jury proceedings and influence the venue where any investigation and review might be taking place.  [pdf, Page 9] 

In addition to sending the letter to the Southern District of Florida, John Brennan also sent the letter to the New York Times to help him frame a media defense.

[…] Pursuing the case in Fort Pierce, Fla., would draw jurors from a more conservative area than the District of Columbia and put it under Judge Cannon, who showed Mr. Trump unusual favor during the documents investigation. In particular, Mike Davis, an influential former Republican Senate staff aide and friend of Mr. Reding Quiñones, has pushed the idea of a Fort Pierce grand jury, warning Mr. Trump’s adversaries to “lawyer up.” (read more)

Again, get familiar with this letter, because you will find me citing it quite a bit in the next few weeks.

Wainstein and Brennan have made a significant strategic mistake by detailing their defenses, specifically by framing the background context of prior investigative authorities in their positions.  What they have inadvertently done for Jason Quiñones is to give a potential expanded witness list for a conspiracy review.

With information from a mountain of previous research, Quiñones can now call ancillary actors to testify as to the nature of their participation based on the storyline of Brennan.  Wainstein even cited the Robert Mueller investigation as part of his defense for his client.

Example, people like the SSCI chair Rubio, and/or Vice-Chair Warner, along with Feinstein’s lead staff Dan Jones, and/or the SSCI Security Director James Wolfe, can be called to answer questions within a grand jury proceeding based on the claims of Brennan’s defense team in this letter.

Former DNI James Clapper, former NSA Director Mike Rogers, former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and former counterintelligence officers could all be questioned based on Brennan’s defense.

All of the Brennan defense citations in the letter open up pathways for Quinones questioning.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 14:50

More Ukrainian Strikes On Russian Energy Sector Amid Ongoing Pressure For Zelensky To Make Concessions

More Ukrainian Strikes On Russian Energy Sector Amid Ongoing Pressure For Zelensky To Make Concessions

Ukraine is desperately hitting back at Russia's energy sector at a moment it remains under immense pressure from Washington to make serious concessions which might lead to achieving a peace deal.

Overnight drone attacks attempted to inflict damage on the Stavrolen petrochemical plant in southwestern Russia. The operation appeared at least somewhat successful amid reports of fires at the site, and as Russia confirmed attempts to intercept inbound drones.

Ukrainian drones attempted to attack the energy targets in the town of Budyonnovsk, triggering air defenses, with the regional governor confirming "There are fires in the industrial zone" and that "Emergency services are on site" - however thankfully that there were no casualties or damage to surrounding homes. Unverified videos widely circulating online do show large flames in the sky from the direction of the plant.

These Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian oil and energy sites have slowed compared to their high tempo of a month ago and prior.

This could in part be because every time Ukraine hits Russian territory with a significant or damaging attack, Russia's military comes back harder with large-scale retaliation on Ukraine's own critical infrastructure. 

Early Tuesday witnessed another huge Russian aerial attack across Ukraine which reportedly killed three people and plunged who regions into darkness. Local media details, "Explosions were reported across multiple regions, including Rivne and the Ivano-Frankivsk region in the far west, with hits recorded in the towns of Burshtyn and Rohatyn. The blasts were also heard near Cherkasy, as well as in Odesa, Khmelnytskyi, Ternopil, and Zhytomyr regions."

BBC related President Zelensky's description of the fresh attack as follows:

Russia carried out a "massive" overnight attack on several Ukrainian cities, President Volodymyr Zelensky has said, a day after he warned of strikes over the Christmas period.

At least three people were killed, according to Ukrainian officials, including a four-year-old child, while energy infrastructure was also targeted, leaving several regions without power.

Russia launched 635 drones and 38 missiles, Ukraine's air force said, adding that 621 of them were downed.

Zelensky said "people simply want to be with their families, at home, and safe" in the run-up to Christmas, and said the strikes sent "an extremely clear signal about Russia's priorities" despite ongoing peace talks.

Damaged home from Russia's fresh assault which spanned several cities and regions of Ukraine:

Power has been cut to many thousands in freezing winter temperatures across Ukraine, as the national energy ministry confirmed there would have to be more rolling blackouts as immediate repair work to the damage is undertaken.

Such power restrictions have become to the norm in various parts of Ukraine. Even US leaders have acknowledged that the energy grid is being degraded and damaged faster than it could possibly be repaired, and no solutions have been offered.

Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha has called on "collective transatlantic strength" in the face of these attacks and said that peace must be forced on Moscow. "This can be achieved through increasing the cost of continuing this war for the aggressor," he said on X.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 14:20

Chicago's Guaranteed Income Guarantees Less Opportunity

Chicago's Guaranteed Income Guarantees Less Opportunity

Authored by Josh Bandoch via RealClearPolitics,

There have been more than 150 guaranteed income pilot programs implemented across the country, but only one has made its program permanent – Cook County, Illinois.

The county, which includes Chicago, became the first place in America to commit to a taxpayer-funded program indefinitely, serving as the nucleus for expanding the scope of these programs nationally. Taxpayers and recipients beware.

A guaranteed income program is simple: Give low-income people a monthly amount of money to use as they see fit. These payments are in addition to other welfare benefits they receive, and don’t come with any requirements to work, to learn better money management, or to get job training.

The idea is to promote equity and help the poor and disadvantaged, a noble goal, but in practice it can harm families by reducing work, income, and opportunity.

They’re extremely expensive, too, and threaten to wreck the finances of any city or state that implements them with ever-higher taxes.

Cook County used $42 million in funds from the American Rescue Plan to run a two-year pilot program that provided 3,250 low- to moderate-income participants with $500 per month.

The results? One firm committed to “equitable economic development” found four apparent benefits.

Their modeling estimated that households directly spent 55.8% of the money received. The $42 million investment generated only $8.3 million annually for local businesses and a $5.4 million increase in annual economic output in Cook County. Generating $286,000 in tax revenue, $44,000 of which stayed in Cook County.

One concern with these findings is that no results from a control group were reported. There’s no way of knowing if the increases were a result of these 3,250 recipients or if it was simply a post-pandemic boon.

The county is continuing the program in 2026 at a cost of $7.5 million to local taxpayers.

Another study of a more rigorous Chicago-area pilot program with a control group found that the program discouraged participants from working and reduced their earned income.

Taking part in the pilot actually lowered participants’ earned income by $1800, excluding program payments. Recipients’ workforce participation dropped by 3.9 percentage points. 

Participants and, surprisingly, others in the recipient’s household, ended up reducing their hours worked per week. Children who grow up around full-time working adults are more likely to climb the economic ladder, so this reduction in work threatens the future of participants’ children.

Still, the appetite for guaranteed income programs is rapidly expanding in Illinois and nationally. Illinois allocated $827,272 in its 2026 budget to fund a pilot.

In October, Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ) reintroduced the Guaranteed Income Pilot Act, with the stated goal of lifting people out of poverty. The federal program would select 20,000 participants.

Of them, 10,000 would receive “a cash payment each month equal to the fair market rent for a 2-bedroom home in the ZIP Code in which the eligible individual resides, or a substantially similar amount.” In Chicago, the payment would increase to $2,670 per month. In New York, it’d be $2910. A control group would contain 10,000 people.

A final report on the program would explicitly be required to study the feasibility of expanding the program. The goal of these programs – sometimes explicitly stated – is to cover more people.  

The federal government spends $1.2 trillion on welfare programs. Despite all that spending, the federal poverty rate has stubbornly hovered between 11% and 15% for decades.

Providing no-strings cash payments won’t solve poverty, and it won’t ensure recipients can gain the skills and experiences necessary to climb the economic ladder.

The best way to help low-income Americans is to expand opportunity. This starts by removing systemic barriers the government has created that disincentivize work.

America’s welfare system makes it economically rational and psychologically understandable for poor people to reject opportunities due to “benefits cliffs.” Increases in income through raises and promotions can cause recipients to lose more in welfare benefits than they gain in higher earnings.

To solve these cliffs, federal lawmakers should consolidate programs to reduce redundancy, standardize benefit reductions across programs, and streamline benefit delivery systems.

State and local elected officials should focus on empowering people through work rather than disincentivizing it. The best way to do this is to adopt a career-first education system that’ll ensure people have the skills they need to work and cast aside the broken degree-first model.

With guaranteed income programs gaining traction, we need to instead embrace the reality that the only proven way to guarantee more income and opportunity and help low-income Americans is work.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 14:00

Ugly, Tailing 5Y Auction Sees Slide In Foreign Demand As Directs Take Record High

Ugly, Tailing 5Y Auction Sees Slide In Foreign Demand As Directs Take Record High

After a disappointing, subpar, tailing 2Y auction started off the last coupon week of the year, moments ago we got the week's second auction, a $70BN sale of 5Y paper which was also disappointing.

The auction stopped at a high yield of 3.747%, up from 3.557% in November and the highest since July. It also tailed the When Issued 3.7146 by 0.1bps. This was the 6th tail in the past 7 auctions.

The bid to cover dropped to 2.35 from 2.41 last month; thie was the lost since September and also below the recent average of 2.36.

The internals were also soft, especially at the Indirects: foreign buyers took down just 59.5%, the lowest since September and well below the recent average of 61.8%. The trend is clearly not the 5Y tenor's friend. 

But it was Directs who saved the day: awarded 31.7%, this was the highest on record.

As a result, dealers were left holding 8.8%, tied for the lowest on record.

Overall, this was an ugly, tailing 5Y auction but it could have been even worse had Directs not stepped up. Or maybe they did just because they know that in a few more months the Fed will expand its universe of QE purchases from Bill-2Y all the way to 5Y... and beyond, as Powell gradually shifts to the endgame, which as readers know well, is nothing less than Yield Curve Control.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 13:24

The EU's Failed Attempt To Steal Russia's Seized Assets Was Self-Discrediting

The EU's Failed Attempt To Steal Russia's Seized Assets Was Self-Discrediting

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

It arguably dealt irreparable damage to the bloc’s reputation as a safe location in which foreigners the world over could store and invest their financial assets after influential members left no doubt about their desire to steal its assets, thus signaling that they might try to steal other countries’ one day too.

It was assessed last week that “The EU’s New Policy Towards Russia’s Seized Assets Isn’t About Helping Ukraine” after influential members of the bloc moved to either outright confiscate at least some of Russia’s seized assets for giving to Ukraine or use at least some of them as collateral for a loan to it. As was written, the real purpose was denying the US access to these funds for joint projects with Russia per point 14 of Trump’s reported 28-point peace deal framework, not arming Ukraine or reconstructing it.

For as much as European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and her compatriot German Chancellor Friedrich Merz tried, they failed to reach consensus on this unprecedented move, which would have provoked the US’ wrath like was explained in the analysis above. Instead, they reached a compromise whereby members – except Czechia, Hungary, and Slovakia – will raise common debt to finance a €90 billion loan to Ukraine over the next two years, thus perpetuating the conflict.

This was an attempt to “save face” after their whopping 16-hour-long talks on this issue since no outcome at all would have exposed the bloc’s impotency, yet The Economist concluded right afterwards that the US will still see it that way since its two most powerful politicians ultimately didn’t get their way. To add insult to the injury inflicted upon the German Chancellor’s reputation, the Financial Times then cited a source who claimed that “Macron betrayed Merz” by not backing the latter’s plot.

The EU’s failed attempt to steal Russia’s seized assets was therefore self-discrediting for him and von der Leyen personally but also for the EU as a whole since it arguably dealt irreparable damage to the bloc’s reputation as a safe location in which foreigners the world over could store and invest their financial assets. Even though Russia’s seized ones weren’t (yet?) stolen, there’s no longer any doubt that influential members of the EU had the intent to do so, thus shattering the aforesaid perception.

As was written in the analysis hyperlinked to in the introduction, “Foreign investors might be spooked into fearing that their assets are no longer safe and could thus pull them from EU banks and not deposit future ones there either. The bloc might therefore ultimately lose hundreds of billions of dollars, perhaps upwards of a trillion or even more with time”. After all, since they tried to steal Russia’s assets, they might also try to steal the assets of other countries with which they might have problems one day too.

Unlike Russia, however, relatively less significant states might not have the chance to reach a deal along the lines of the US’ proposed one whereby a share of these assets would be returned in the form of joint investments if other conditions are met. Even so, the EU would still have to cross the Rubicon by authorizing the theft of those countries’ seized assets and also importantly defend this decision in court when it’s legally challenged, with a supportive ruling dealing a deathblow to the bloc’s reputation.

Top non-Western countries like China and India, which are the possible targets of European political (and perhaps other forms of) aggression after Russia, might not want to risk that and could thus begin transferring some of their EU-based assets and not depositing more (at least at scale) in the future. It remains to be seen just how financially damaging the EU’s failed attempt to steal Russia’s seized assets was, but there’s no doubt that it was self-discrediting, which in any case damages the bloc’s reputation.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 13:20

Musk, US Gov't In Talks Over Land Swap Deal To Expand SpaceX Launch Operations

Musk, US Gov't In Talks Over Land Swap Deal To Expand SpaceX Launch Operations

The Trump administration is considering a proposed land swap that would transfer about 775 acres of federally protected land in the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge to SpaceX, allowing Elon Musk's rocket company to expand launch operations in the newly incorporated town of Starbase, Texas, helping ensure America continues to lead the space race into the 2030s.

New documents obtained by The New York Times show that SpaceX would give the federal government approximately 692 acres of land it owns elsewhere in Cameron County in exchange for 775 acres.

Not surprisingly, the proposed land swap has caused an uproar among conservationists and archaeologists who say the 775 acres are home to endangered species and even part of the Palmito Ranch Battlefield.

However, Fish and Wildlife Service officials have taken a more optimistic view of the proposed land swap. In an October memorandum, Stewart Jacks, the agency's acting regional director for the Southwest region, wrote that the swap deal would deliver a "net conservation benefit."

The deal would "facilitate greater habitat protections for important fish and wildlife resources," Jacks wrote in a letter to Brian Nesvik, the director of the Fish and Wildlife Service. He added that SpaceX would divest of lands that "include high-quality habitat for a myriad of species, including the endangered ocelot."

But Sharon Wilcox, the senior Texas representative for Defenders of Wildlife, a conservation group, said she was skeptical of Jacks' claims, noting that "With SpaceX present in this place, we have a very explosive force nestled in among all of these really fragile habitats."

What's clear is that any proposed land swap would have been rejected if Democrats were still in the White House. In fact, Musk blamed federal agencies, such as the Fish and Wildlife Service, for being weaponized against him during the Biden-Harris regime years that slowed rocket launches.

To expand Starbase City, it seems a lot more land will be needed. SpaceX says on its website that it plans "to build 1,000 Starships per year in order to send enough crew and cargo during Mars transfer windows to build a self-sustaining civilisation."

Starbase City is incredibly special, with its cutting-edge industrial spaceflight infrastructure, including a purpose-built town that merges factories, launch pads, housing, and local services into a single live-work town built entirely around the Starship program.

The city is the first of its kind, well, at least in our generation, as building company towns in the 1800s and 1900s was popular nationwide when America was an industrial powerhouse. Those times are changing as the Trump administration seeks to revitalize the nation's industrial core.

Thanks to Musk, America leads the space race and will likely continue to do so well into the 2030s.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 12:40

Johnson Whips Out Warning Over 3rd Trump Impeachment If Democrats Win Midterms

Johnson Whips Out Warning Over 3rd Trump Impeachment If Democrats Win Midterms

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) warned that President Donald Trump could face another House impeachment inquiry if Republicans don’t win the 2026 midterm elections.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) at a press conference in Washington on Nov. 3, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times

“Everything is on the line in the midterms of 2026, and we have much more to do. But if we lose the House majority, the radical left, as you’ve already heard, is going to impeach President Trump. They’re going to create absolute chaos; we cannot let that happen, and I know you won’t,” Johnson told the audience at the AmericaFest event in Phoenix on Sunday.

The House speaker added that the audience should emulate Charlie Kirk, the conservative podcaster who was assassinated in September, saying that they should “fight like happy warriors, advance his principles, and adopt his approach.” AmericaFest is an annual event hosted by Turning Point USA, which Kirk had founded.

We will win next year, and we will save the greatest nation in the history of the world,” Johnson said.

House Democrats impeached Trump twice during his first term. In late 2019, they charged him with abuse of power centered around a phone call that he had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy over military aid. The second occurred in 2021 after the breach at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 of that year. The Senate acquitted him both times.

Earlier this year, Johnson told the Shreveport Times, “Democrats would vote to impeach [Trump] on their first day” in office if they won in the 2026 midterm elections. In October, he offered a similar message to Fox News’ Laura Ingraham and predicted that the GOP would win those elections.

It takes a simple House majority to impeach a sitting president. However, the bar is set much higher in the Senate, where a two-thirds majority is needed to convict.

Several Democratic lawmakers, including Reps. Al Green (D-Texas) and Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.), have said they will try to impeach Trump.

The House in June voted overwhelmingly to set aside an effort to impeach Trump on a sole charge of abuse of power after he launched military strikes on Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities without first seeking authorization from Congress. The measure was sponsored by Green. Most Democrats joined the Republican majority to table it.

Earlier this month, the House voted 237–140 to shelve another Green impeachment resolution, with 47 Democratic lawmakers voting present. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and his deputies said in a statement before the vote that impeachment “requires a comprehensive investigative process” that had not been undertaken by the Republican majority.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 12:20

DOJ Releases More Epstein Files After Blowing Deadline, Says Some Documents Contain False Claims

DOJ Releases More Epstein Files After Blowing Deadline, Says Some Documents Contain False Claims

After missing a Friday deadline to release 'all' of the 'Epstein Files,' nuking several files containing images of President Donald Trump (before restoring them!), and heavily redacting most of what came out (which can apparently be un-redacted to reveal salacious claims against Trump), the DOJ on Tuesday morning released nearly 30,000 additional pages according to a statement posted on X, which also warned that some of the claims made in the documents against Trump are 'untrue and sensationalist.'

"Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election," reads the post. "To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.

"Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims." 

For example:

The releases were mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency act, which was passed in Congress and signed into law by Trump. It requires the DOJ to produce all records related to Epstein, accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, and any other possible co-conspirators by Dec. 19. 

Over the weekend, Deputy AG Todd Blanche said that the DOJ is working to make redactions to files to protect possible Epstein victims, telling NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday "The reason why we are still reviewing documents and still continuing our process is simply that to protect victims," adding that the DOJ is "going through a very methodical process with hundreds of lawyers looking at every single document and making sure that victims’ names and any of the information from victims is protected and redacted, which is exactly what the [Epstein Files] Transparency Act expects."

Except, apparently it's amateur hour at the DOJ...

 In a Saturday evening statement, the DOJ wrote that it had re-released 119 pages of materials that had been entirely redacted.

"Documents and photos will continue to be reviewed consistent with the law and with an abundance of caution for victims and their families," the department posted to X. 

Maxwell is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence stemming from her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking crimes, while Epstein was found dead in a New York City jail cell in Aug. 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 12:00

Will The CME Raid The Silver Party?

Will The CME Raid The Silver Party?

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Silver’s parabolic rise has been remarkable. Its price has more than doubled this year and is nearly three times higher than in 2023. The current surge closely mirrors two previous price jumps shown below. 

In this article, we examine the two similar price surges shown below to provide context for what may be occurring today and, importantly, for what might cause this bubble to pop tomorrow.

The Post Financial Crisis Silver Surge

As the turmoil of the Financial Crisis of 2008 began to ease in 2009, the price of silver embarked on a 500% rally, rising from $8.50 to $50.00 over two years. The Fed’s excessive monetary responses to the crisis, alongside heavy speculation, created a perfect storm for silver.

During the crisis, the Fed cut interest rates to zero, introduced QE, and implemented a host of monetary bailouts. As a result, real interest rates (adjusted for inflation) collapsed into negative territory. The graph below shows that 2-year UST real yields fell sharply in 2009 and continued lower until mid-2011. The increase in silver prices coincided with the decline in real yields.  Such distortions in monetary policy, as evidenced by real yields, benefit silver as it is considered a high-beta monetary hedge against extreme monetary policy actions.  

While the monetary environment was conducive to such a rally, there was also a supply-demand mismatch benefiting prices. The supply of silver is relatively inelastic, meaning that mining operations can’t promptly increase output to meet rapid changes in demand. The advent of ETFs makes the asset class far more accessible to a much larger class of investors, adding to the supply-demand imbalance. Maybe most impactful, speculative investors, using futures, options, and other forms of leverage, significantly boosted demand.

The boom ended in 2011 when the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) raised margin requirements five separate times in nine days. The graph below, courtesy of Business Insider, shows the doubling of silver margin requirements and the destructive impact on prices.  The CME’s action forced deleveraging in the futures markets, resulting in silver falling by nearly 30% over a few weeks. Demand for physical silver didn’t necessarily vanish, but leverage and the extra buying power it created did. Additionally, QE2 ended in June 2011; real interest rates began to rise, and the U.S. dollar appreciated.

The Fed’s unprecedented monetary policy actions and speculative leverage drove up silver prices. As those factors reversed, and the CME made leverage costlier, silver prices crashed.

The 1970s Hunt Brothers Squeeze

The Hunt brothers, Nelson, Lamar, and William, had extensive holdings in oil, real estate, cattle, and sugar. Concerned about the effects of what they believed were careless monetary and fiscal policies, as well as the risks posed by the newly formed oil cartel (OPEC), they sought to hedge their businesses and assets. Since it was still illegal for individual investors to own gold, they chose physical silver.

The Hunts began buying silver in 1973, when the price per ounce was $1.50. Over the next six years, the Hunts increased their holdings to more than 200 million ounces, valued at more than $4.5 billion.

Silver Rule 7

In late 1979, their massive holdings and the impact they were having on silver prices prompted action by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the CME. Both entities sought to restrict their purchases and compel the liquidation of the brothers’ silver assets. In January 1980, the CME enacted Silver Rule 7, which imposed stringent restrictions on the purchase of silver futures on margin. This rule significantly increased the amount of collateral required of traders, thereby curbing leveraged speculative buying. It also included restrictions on the number of contracts one could hold and effectively halted new margin buying.

These changes meant that if a trader wanted to continue buying, they would have needed to put up nearly 100% cash for their positions instead of borrowing on margin — effectively eliminating leverage.

Silver nearly hit $50 per ounce in mid-January 1980 and then, due to the abrupt changes in margin requirements, fell to $10 per ounce by the end of March. At that point, margin calls on futures contracts and borrowings against existing silver holdings depleted the Hunts’ cash, forcing them to liquidate their holding to cover margin debts.

Leverage Builds and Leverage Kills

The Hunts initially took physical delivery of silver and did not use leverage. Over time, though, they understood the power of using their silver as collateral to buy more. Buying silver futures on margin enabled them to positively influence the price at a fraction of the cost. Such leverage allowed them to multiply their purchasing power and drive silver prices higher. The only requirement for the Hunts scheme was to maintain sufficient cash to adequately fund their futures margin account.

In addition to the CFTC and CME efforts, the Federal Reserve also played a role in breaking the Hunt brothers. Fed Chairman Paul Volcker sharply raised interest rates in January 1980, from 11.75% to 20.0%, making margin borrowing for the Hunts and other speculators much more expensive. One week after the Hunts ceased market activity, Volcker began lowering interest rates.

Leverage allowed the Hunts to distort the price of silver, but it also killed their legendary squeeze. They incurred over $1.1 billion in losses on the trade. They also lost civil lawsuit claims, which, in part, led them to declare bankruptcy.

The Tiffany advertisement below describes the economic effect the Hunts had on various industries. 

Current Silver Situation

Today, there are many sound, fundamental reasons for the recent rise in silver prices, as there were in the 1970s and in the post-financial-crisis years. For example:

Monetary & Fiscal Tailwinds: Like in the post-Financial Crisis era, the post-pandemic environment has certainly provided those with a reason to hedge against monetary tomfoolery with precious metals. The monetary debasement narrative certainly adds to the conversation. Moreover, with QE resuming and a few signs that DOGE hasn’t reduced fiscal spending, there does not appear to be an end in sight to the monetary and fiscal problems we face. 

Supply Deficit: Silver has been in a multi-year supply deficit, with demand exceeding newly mined supply and silver from recycling.

Surging Industrial Demand: Silver is essential for solar panels, electric vehicles, power electronics, semiconductors, and data-center infrastructure. Given the rapid growth in these sectors globally, silver demand is increasing.

Limited Supply: Roughly 70% of silver production is a by-product of mining for other metals. This means that higher silver prices alone do not incentivize new supply, thereby slowing the market’s ability to rebalance. Moreover, reserve depletion, declining ore grades, mine closures, and underinvestment in exploration and development constrain supply.

Valuations

Silver investors often use ratios to assess silver value. Among the most widely used are the silver-to-gold and silver-to-oil ratios. The chart below shows both ratios. The silver-to-oil ratio (green) is at record highs going back to at least 1990. As the graph shows, there have been numerous spikes in the past. Assuming this too is a spike, either oil prices are ready to ramp higher, or silver is due for a mighty correction.

The silver-to-gold ratio remains cheap despite silver’s recent outperformance versus gold. If the ratio were to return to its late-2011 highs, silver prices would have to rise significantly more than gold prices. While a continued increase in the ratio is undoubtedly possible, note that the trend has been downward for most of the 55 years shown.

When Will The CME Raid The Party?

The problem with traditional valuation and fundamental analysis, as discussed above, is the precedent the CME has set when the price of silver goes parabolic. Accordingly, we think it’s only a matter of price before the CME and/or governmental action pulls the rug out from silver speculators.

If you disagree, consider that on December 12th, the CME raised silver margins by 10%, as shown below. In 2011, the first margin increase also had no impact. It was the subsequent actions that were the problem.

Silver investors should carefully read the sections above detailing the post-financial-crisis period and the Hunt Brothers boom-bust cycles. Changes in margin requirements and rules triggered mass liquidations of silver, resulting in an abrupt reversal of fortunes. Such actions are unpredictable and happen extremely fast.

Summary

At its core, this article provides yet another lesson on the high price that leverage can inflict on investors. When the market for an asset becomes highly leveraged, the risks increase markedly. We are reasonably confident that this bullish charge in silver will end poorly, as it has in the other two instances. What we don’t know is when the shift will occur. Complicating the timing is that the CME could, on any day, terminate the leverage.

Fool me once, shame on you. Twice, then shame on me. But fool me three times….

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 11:40

Christmas Day Gasoline Prices Set To Fall To COVID-Era Levels

Christmas Day Gasoline Prices Set To Fall To COVID-Era Levels

Authored by Alex Kimani via OilPrice.com,

U.S. gasoline prices are set to fall to the lowest level since 2020, thanks to increasing supplies, despite some ongoing refinery maintenance, GasBuddy has predicted.

GasBuddy has predicted that U.S. motorists will pay an average of $2.79 per gallon on Christmas Day, down from $2.95 per gallon a year ago.

That will mark the cheapest gas since prices averaged $2.26 per gallon in the Christmas of 2020.

Christmas is often when gas prices settle near the lowest levels of the year, and 2025 is no exception,” said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy.

Refinery maintenance has wrapped up, supplies are rising, and winter demand is much lower than in summer — all of which help keep a lid on prices.

Provided there are no surprises; holiday travelers should see pump prices that come in a bit lower than last Christmas.

We’re also seeing encouraging early trends as we prepare to release our 2026 Fuel Outlook in January, with signs that lower prices could continue into next year,” he added.

The national average price of gasoline has continued on a downward trend after dropping below $3 a gallon two weeks ago, sinking to their lowest level since 2021.

The average U.S. gas price is now $2.905 per gallon, down from $3.030 a year ago.

However, prices vary widely by state, with motorists in Oklahoma paying $2.339 per gallon compared to $4.343 in California.

Diesel prices have seen an even steeper decline, with the national average price of diesel currently standing at $3.642 per gallon, down from $3.765 a month ago.

Crude oil prices are currently falling due to a significant global oversupply, weaker-than-expected demand growth, and easing of geopolitical risk premiums.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 11:00

US Launches Tariff Action Over Chinese "Unreasonable" Pursuit Of Chip Industry Dominance

US Launches Tariff Action Over Chinese "Unreasonable" Pursuit Of Chip Industry Dominance

It appears that the unstable trade truce between the US and China is over.  

In what the SCMP calls a "decisive trade move against China’s semiconductor industry" the US Trade Representative Office said it had determined that Beijing’s drive for dominance in the sector is “unreasonable and discriminatory” and poses a direct threat to US commerce.

In a formal Notice of Action filed with the Federal Register, the agency said the US will slap tariffs on Chinese semiconductor imports over Beijing's "unreasonable" pursuit of chip industry dominance, but would delay the action until June 2027, at which point the rate will be raised to a higher level that will be announced 30 days before the deadline.

The filing follows a year-long investigation into China's chip imports into the United States, launched by the Biden administration on December 23, 2024, which concluded that China has employed “sweeping non-market policies” to capture global market share and displace foreign competitors.

The USTR said China’s industrial plans target “every major segment of the semiconductor supply chain,” including fabrication, design, assembly, testing and packaging.

“China’s pursuit of its dominance goals has severely disadvantaged US companies, workers, and the US economy generally,” the notice said, citing lost sales, reduced competition, and the creation of dangerous economic dependencies.

"China’s targeting of the semiconductor industry for dominance is unreasonable and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is actionable," the U.S. Trade Representative concluded. 

According to Reuters, the move represents the latest effort by President Donald Trump to dial down tensions with Beijing, faced with Chinese export curbs on the rare earth metals that global tech companies rely on and which China controls. We disagree, and view the decision - which finds that China is aggressively abusing free markets - will be one which forces Beijing to retaliate in tit-for-tat fashion. 

The chip industry is awaiting the outcome of another investigation into chip imports that could hit Chinese goods and result in tariffs on a vast array of technology, but U.S. officials are privately saying that they might not levy them anytime soon, Reuters reported

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 10:40

The Bizarro-World Of The Forever Maskers

The Bizarro-World Of The Forever Maskers

Authored by 'sallust' via DailySceptic.org,

The Telegraph has a story about the ‘Zero Covid’ zealots refusing to re-enter society.

Not only that, but these forever maskers want everyone else masked up in perpetuity too. It’s a remarkable instance of the emergence of a new form of cult based on a surreal new ritual. And just for good measure, it seems that those leaning Left are most likely to be on board:

The claims of links to Covid circulating online amid the deadly chaos were not always proved beyond doubt, but in this climate of fear and confusion, a determined ‘Zero Covid’ community emerged. Co-opting a phrase that was originally an official public health policy, the ‘Zero Coviders’ believed they were watching a massacre in real time, and the maskless – especially those who were unvaccinated – were to blame. As governments relaxed the restrictions, they felt they needed to step up.

“I was like, ‘Okay, this is not right. This is f—–,'” says [Alyson] Hardwick, a second-year university student who does not have any underlying health conditions. The last time she ate indoors at a restaurant was in October 2022 for her 31st birthday. “I felt sketched out [uneasy],” she recalls. “I was leaving every place I was going inside without a mask, wondering, ‘Did I get it?’”

Hardwick began wearing a respirator mask – specialised, disposable facepieces called N95s or N99s which offer more comprehensive protection than a surgical mask – and spending most of her time alone.

She’s ostracised herself from other people and posts thousands of clips online and argues that it’s everyone else, not her, who is living in fear. “Denial is a fear response,” she insists.

Hardwick’s stance exemplifies the increasingly fraught Zero Covid movement – a citizen-led campaign across the Western world to keep the air clean. She is just one of thousands of geographically disparate people, many of whom are not immunocompromised, who are still living in their own self-imposed lockdowns, fearful of becoming one of the millions to suffer with serious long Covid symptoms, or anxious about transmitting the virus to someone less fortunate. Zero Covid has adherents across North America and Europe, including some in the UK, but followers from the US and Canada are the most visible online.

The charged movement to end ‘pandemic denialism’ has some high-profile advocates, including Left-wing US journalist Taylor Lorenz. “If ur [sic] not masking ur absolutely facilitating eugenics,” Lorenz posted to her 350,000 followers on X on December 6th.

“Refusing to mask during an ongoing pandemic is absolutely violent and it’s undeniably participating in social murder,” she said in another recent post, as well as calling out Leftist “super spreader” events. “You are actively *killing* and maiming people around you by intentionally spreading airborne disease during an active pandemic.” (Separately, she pilloried non-maskers for “raw-dogging the air and spewing ur disease laden breath all over ur elderly neighbours”.)

By 2022, the pandemic and the panicked measures were retreating into the past:

But the cautious, despite getting vaccinated and then boosted, couldn’t move on. Online communities became lifelines as in-person social circles frayed. Campaigners pushed ‘clean air’ as the next public-health frontier, and offered seatbelt analogies for masking: mildly inconvenient, obviously protective.

Masking was increasingly framed as an act of love, and it was overwhelmingly Left-wing groups which encouraged – even mandated – their continued use. Stevie Nicks of Fleetwood Mac encouraged continued mask wearing. “I f—— hate the masks, but I wear them,” she said. “People give you dirty looks. I dare anybody to give me a dirty look. I would just say, ‘Hey, you know what? I’m Stevie Nicks.'”

That would presumably be the same Stevie Nicks who reportedly blew a hole through her nose from snorting cocaine. By 2023 mask use was largely discredited, but the Telegraph quotes a Mayo Clinic source:

“People who rebuilt their entire lives and recast their identities around reducing the risk of catching Covid to zero couldn’t deal with this,” one former ardent Zero Covider recalls, speaking to me on condition of anonymity.

“The movement devolved into a massive online circle-jerk where members blindly validate each other on taking disproportionate precautions.

One ardent proponent of masking says that’s the way he’ll spend the rest of his life:

“I don’t just, like, go out the way I used to,” says Evan Sachs, who is in his early 30s and lives in New York with his three cats. He always wears a mask outdoors.

“Sometimes it’s a bummer.” Not because masking is keeping him from living his life, he adds, “but because other people [selfishly] aren’t doing the ‘wearing your pants’ levels of easy things” to keep everyone safe. He runs a ‘bloc’ in the Washington Heights area of New York which distributes personal protective equipment (PPE) to less well-off communities. “I do not have Long Covid, thank goodness,” Sachs adds. “I am very, very lucky on that front.”

He doesn’t want to get it either. “I honestly think I would [mask forever],” he says.’

An Austrian doctor called Spela Salomon has no time for non-maskers:

Outside work, she does not spend time with people who do not take equal precautions. “I just don’t feel like I get anything out of hanging around the maskless masses,” she says. “It’s sad and isolating.” In an article published by the World Health Network earlier this year, Salomon predicted that a rising toll of Covid complications would lead to a societal shift in which air quality is recognised as an essential public health priority like potable water. “It is those who persist in denial who are truly living in fear,” she wrote, echoing Hardwick’s sentiment in her social media video.

It appears that the forever maskers have become so dedicated to the cause that they are even fetishizing masks:

US college student Bela waxes lyrical about her powered air-purifying respirator, certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

“It blows air out so that no outside air can get in through the edges from a poor fit or seal,” she told campaign group MaskTogetherAmerica.

Meanwhile, Alyson Hardwick is increasingly focused on her “new passion for Covid”:

Getting a booster jab at least every six months is, for her, a necessary response to what she calls a “mass disability event in slow motion” that has completely transformed her life.

“I’m rarely ever sharing air with people,” she says. If she does meet up with anyone, it will be other Covid-safe people, outdoors. “I feel safe around them, because they’re also masking everywhere.”

Worth reading in full if only to explore the infinite capacity of human beings to turn any cause into a cult, however bizarre the rituals and customs devised to pursue their beliefs.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 10:20

US Industrial Production Rises At Strongest Annual Rate Since Apr 2022

US Industrial Production Rises At Strongest Annual Rate Since Apr 2022

Following the much-stronger-than-expected GDP print, US Industrial Production also surprised to the upside, rising 0.2% MoM in November and pulling the YoY change up to 2.52% - the strongest annual growth since April 2022...

Source: Bloomberg

US Manufacturing output was unchanged in November, but better than the 0.4% MoM decline in October, as Motor Vehicles & Parts fell 5.1% MoM while Utilities jumped 2.6% MoM.

Capacity Utilization limped lower to 75.9% (from an upwardly revised 76.0%), but remains off the Nov 2024 lows...

Source: Bloomberg

So a mixed bag with output up strongly as capacity utilization slides...

Source: Bloomberg

... does that signal the productivity boost everyone has been waiting for?

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 09:31

Education Department Announces Safety Review Of Brown University After Deadly Campus Shooting

Education Department Announces Safety Review Of Brown University After Deadly Campus Shooting

Authored by Kimberley Hayek via The Epoch Times,

The U.S. Department of Education on Monday announced it would conduct a review of Brown University to uncover potential safety violations after a campus shooting left two students dead and nine others wounded, and to determine if the Ivy League institution complied with federal laws requiring ample campus security measures to receive student aid funding.

The review, led by the department’s Office of Federal Student Aid, will assess whether the Ivy League institution met requirements under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, also known as the Clery Act. The law mandates that colleges receiving federal student aid maintain robust security measures, including timely warnings and accurate crime reporting.

Public reports in the hours after the incident suggested Brown’s surveillance and security systems fell short, allowing the suspect to escape while the university struggled to provide useful details about the shooter. Students and staff also reported delays in emergency notifications, sparking worries about the alert system’s effectiveness. If confirmed, these issues could represent major breaches of federal obligations.

“After two students were horrifically murdered at Brown University when a shooter opened fire in a campus building, the Department is initiating a review of Brown to determine if it has upheld its obligation under the law to vigilantly maintain campus security,” Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement.

“Students deserve to feel safe at school, and every university across this nation must protect their students and be equipped with adequate resources to aid law enforcement. The Trump Administration will fight to ensure that recipients of federal funding are vigorously protecting students’ safety and following security procedures as required under federal law.”

As part of the probe, the department has asked Brown to submit documents by Jan. 30, including annual security reports for 2024 and 2025, audit trails of crimes and arrests from 2021 to 2024, dispatch logs, daily crime logs, lists of timely warnings and emergency notifications from 2021 to 2025, and policies on alerts, crime logs, and active shooter protocols. The request also includes any assessments of campus safety practices since 2020.

The shooting, which occurred Dec. 13, drew national attention, with the FBI offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of a suspect.

Killed in the shooting were Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov, an 18-year-old from Virginia who aspired to become a neurosurgeon, and 19-year-old Ella Cook, vice president of the College Republicans at Brown and a native of Mountain Brook, Alabama.

The suspect, Claudio Neves Valente, a 48-year-old Portuguese national and former Brown student, was found dead in a storage unit in Salem, New Hampshire, days later. An autopsy determined he died by suicide with a gun two days before his body was found.

The department’s statement did not clarify a timeline, but noted the process would assess compliance in depth, along with safety requirements.

The university did not return a request for comment by publication time.

Under the Trump administration, the Department of Education has investigated institutions like the University of Pennsylvania for inaccurate foreign funding disclosures and others for allegedly excluding U.S.-born students from scholarships. Continuing disagreements revolve around federal funding linked to diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, as well as anti-Semitism concerns.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 09:20

Q3 GDP Unexpectedly Surges To 2 Year High On Soaring Health Insurance Spending

Q3 GDP Unexpectedly Surges To 2 Year High On Soaring Health Insurance Spending

By now, Q3 GDP - which should have been reported almost two months ago - is ancient history but it still matters in a world where the Fed's every sneeze is overanalyzed. Which is why the report by the Bureau of Economic Analysis that in Q3 US GDP surged by 4.3%, up from an already hot 3.8% in Q2 and driven by a spike in consumer spending, will surely raise some eyebrows (for those wondering, this report was originally supposed to hit on Oct 30, and the second estimate was scheduled for Nov 26; none of that happened due to the govt shutdown). This was the highest annualized quarterly GDP print since Q3 2023. 

The number was higher than all but one economist forecasts, and was a 3-sigma beat to the median consensus of 3.3%

According to the BEA, the increase in real GDP in the third quarter reflected increases in consumer spending, exports, and government spending that were partly offset by a decrease in investment. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, decreased. 

Compared to the second quarter, the acceleration in real GDP in the third quarter reflected a smaller decrease in investment, an acceleration in consumer spending, and upturns in exports and government spending. Imports decreased less in the third quarter.

Taking a closer look at the components, this is how the 4.34% increase in bottom line GDP happened:

  • Personal Consumption rose by a whopping 2.39%, up from 1.68% in Q2
  • Fixed Investment moderated, rising by 0.19%, vs 0.77% in Q2. Once again, this is mostly data centers
  • Change in private inventories declined by 0.22%, a moderation from the -3.44% drop in Q2, and to be expected as the trade aberration from the trade war moderate 
  • Net trade (exports less imports) also normalized and after a surge of 4.83%, the increase was a more modest 1.59%, driven by positive contributions from both exports (0.67%) and imports (0.92%).
  • Finally, government contributed 0.39% to Q3 GDP after subtracting from US growth in each of the previous two quarters of 2024.

And visually:

While the surge in personal consumption would be a red flag for the Fed, as it indicates the US consumer is much stronger than expected, the reality is that - as shown below - the bulk of the increase was the result of surge in healthcare spending, which increased at a whopping 0.76% adjusted annual rate. Which means that personal spending was not driven by discretionary splurging but by a need to meet much higher health insurance costs!

Linked to this surge in health insurance, the GDP price index for Q3 jumped 3.8%, up from 2.1% in Q2 and a big beat to the 2.7% estimate. The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index increased 2.8%, compared with an increase of 2.1%. Excluding food and energy prices, the PCE price index increased 2.9 percent, in line with estimates, and higher than the increase of 2.6 percent in Q2.

Overall, this was a stronger than expected print however for all the wrong reasons. As to whether it will change the Fed's thinking, we very much doubt it if the US labor market continues deteriorating as it has been for much of 2025.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 09:09

DOGE Delivers Massive $214 Billion In Taxpayer Savings... So Far

DOGE Delivers Massive $214 Billion In Taxpayer Savings... So Far

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

In a stunning victory against bloated bureaucracy, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), originally spearheaded by Elon Musk, has slashed an eye-popping $214 billion from federal spending in less than a year.

Official figures from DOGE’s own tally reveal a relentless assault on waste, including terminations of thousands of contracts, grants, and leases that were draining resources without delivering value.

From bloated defense deals to questionable health programs, the cuts are stacking up, proving that an America First approach can rein in the deep state’s excesses.

The milestone comes amid widespread praise for Musk’s no-nonsense tactics, even as legacy media nitpicks the details. According to DOGE’s breakdown, contract cancellations alone account for around $61 billion, targeting over 13,000 agreements like a $3.9 billion aircraft maintenance boondoggle and multi-billion-dollar health service pacts that ballooned under prior administrations.

Grants saw $49 billion axed, hitting everything from foreign aid handouts to domestic epidemiology programs that critics argue fueled unnecessary spending.

Leases weren’t spared either, with $113 million clawed back from underused federal spaces across the country—think vacant offices in California and North Carolina that taxpayers were footing the bill for.

Beyond that, DOGE claims broader impacts through asset sales, fraud crackdowns, interest reductions, and workforce streamlining, pushing the total to that landmark $214 billion.

Dividing the savings by roughly 161 million U.S. taxpayers gives a saving of $1,329 for every taxpaying American, a direct hit against the endless tax hikes peddled by big-government advocates.

This triumph throws a harsh spotlight on the left’s double standards. As X user MAZE notes: “Democrats used to preach about the need to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse from the system. Now they enable it and cover it up.”

It’s a damning indictment—while DOGE was busy slashing redundancies, Democrats in Congress and their media allies dragged their feet, defending the very pork-barrel projects that Musk’s team eviscerated.

Recent reports confirm the context: DOGE’s efforts, though now wound down after achieving key goals, targeted sacred cows like USAID’s $1.75 billion grant to the GAVI Foundation and the Department of Energy’s half-billion-dollar handouts for dubious “decarbonization” schemes. These weren’t just cuts—they were a rejection of globalist agendas that prioritize foreign interests over American workers.

The raw impact is undeniable. Musk himself reflected that DOGE was “somewhat successful,” but the $214 billion speaks volumes, far exceeding initial lowered projections and delivering on President Trump’s promise to drain the swamp.

The ripple effects are already showing. Positive market indicators, as highlighted in recent Fox Business segments, point to a “bountiful” 2026 fueled by these efficiencies. Stock futures are climbing, cryptos are steady, and investor confidence is rebounding.

This isn’t about austerity—it’s about smart governance. By dismantling the layers of fraud and inefficiency that Democrats once railed against but now protect, DOGE has handed everyday Americans a massive return on their tax dollars.

This isn’t just numbers on a page—it’s real relief for every taxpaying American fed up with Washington’s endless money pit.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 08:51

Core Durable Goods Orders Rise For 7th Straight Month

Core Durable Goods Orders Rise For 7th Straight Month

While admittedly extremely lagging, the preliminary OCTOBER durable goods orders print was a big disappointment after a rebound in the summer with the headline falling 2.2% MoM (far worse than the 1.5% MoM decline expected). However, while this disappointment dragged down the YoY growth to 4.7%, it was still well above inflation...

Source: Bloomberg

Core Orders (ex Transports) rose 0.2% MoM (notably slower than the 0.7% MoM in September and below the +0.3% MoM expected)...

Source: Bloomberg

That was the 7th straight monthly gain and lifted core durable goods orders up 3.57% YoY, near the highest since Nov 2022.

Finally, core capex remains solid with new orders ex-air up 0.5% (4th straight monthly gain) and shipments continue to significantly stronger than expected.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 08:41

Futures Flat Ahead Of Final Macro Data Dump Of 2025

Futures Flat Ahead Of Final Macro Data Dump Of 2025

US equity futures are flat, pointing to a muted open off the overnight session highs on the last full trading session before Christmas, as traders await the last remaining data sets of 2025 to see whether they could materially change expectations for Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts. As of 8:0am ET, the S&P 500 is little changed after a three-day rally that has pushed the benchmark within reach of a new all-time high; Nasdaq futures are down 0.1% with Mag 7 names mixed. European stocks are buoyed by a 7% surge in the shares of Novo Nordisk after the Danish firm won US approval to sell a pill version of its obesity drug Wegovy. US Treasuries steadied after days of losses, with the 10-year yield declining two basis points to 4.15%. The dollar fell to the lowest level since October. Gold extended its record-breaking run, setting sights on $4,500 an ounce. Copper rose past $12,000 a ton for the first time. Bitcoin fell again, failing to stage even a modest rebound. The US calendar includes ADP weekly employment change (8:15am), 3Q GDP (8:30am), November industrial production (9:15am), December Richmond Fed manufacturing index, consumer confidence (10am).

In premarket trading, Mag 7 stocks are mixed: (Tesla +0.4%, Alphabet is little changed, Microsoft +0.07%, Apple -0.05%, Amazon -0.1%, Meta is little changed, Nvidia -0.4%)

  • Gold, silver and copper mining and royalty stocks climb as the metals continued to hit record highs amid rising geopolitical tensions. Barrick Mining (B) rises 1% while Hudbay Minerals (HBM) gains 1%.
  • Invivyd (IVVD) climbs 1% after the FDA granted a fast track designation for the biotech’s investigational vaccine-alternative monoclonal antibody candidate for Covid prevention in individuals with underlying risk factors for severe Covid.
  • Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) soars 25% after the company said that the US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration approved the firm’s Las Flores pipeline restart plan.
  • Zim Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) climbs 8% after the company said it is evaluating proposals from multiple potential buyers. The review of strategic alternatives is in advanced stages.

In corporate news, department stores group Saks, facing limited options ahead of a more than $100 million debt payment due at the end of this month, is considering Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a last resort, according to people with knowledge of the situation. Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay about $1.56 billion to a Maryland woman who blamed the company’s talc-based baby powder for causing her asbestos-linked cancer, the largest such jury verdict for an individual in 15 years of litigation. And Nvidia’s biggest Southeast Asian chip customer is facing a smuggling investigation.

The latest three-day rally pushed US stocks fractionally into positive territory for the month after a turbulent start to December. Preserving those gains until the end of December would extend this winning streak to an eighth month, the longest such run since 2018.

Meanwhile, volatility is collapsing. With the VIX index at 14.11, implied volatility for US equities over the coming 30 days is near the lowest in more than a year. That reflects enduring investor optimism around strong earnings growth, slowing inflation and a soft landing for the economy.

“Volatility is sitting at the lows of the year, while credit spreads are among the most compressed we’ve seen in decades,” said Alberto Tocchio, portfolio manager at Kairos Partners. “That dynamic is helping sustain the current market bonanza, especially in an environment where trading volumes are falling sharply and many discretionary players are already on the sidelines.”

The VIX may be snoozing around a 12-month low, but investors added new short bets across US stock futures last week, leaving net positioning near neutral levels, according to Citigroup strategists. Exposure to the Russell 2000 index of small caps is now bearish.

While Tuesday’s delayed third-quarter US gross domestic product print will likely be too dated to offer a clear read on current conditions, traders will also focus on consumer data after November showed a sharp slump in confidence.

In Europe, the Stoxx 600 edges up 0.2% to touch a new all time high with the health care sector leading gains. Novo Nordisk shares rally after the Danish drugmaker won approval to sell a pill version of its blockbuster obesity shot Wegovy in the US. Meanwhile, banks underperform. Here are some of the biggest movers on Tuesday:

  • Novo Nordisk shares rise as much as 7.9%, the most since August, after the Danish drugmaker won approval to sell a pill version of its blockbuster obesity shot Wegovy in the US.
  • SIG Group shares gain as much as 6.8%, the most in over a month, after the Swiss food packaging maker disclosed that Swedish activist investor Cevian Capital acquired a 3.1% stake.

Asian stocks were on course to advance for a third day, helped by gains in Japan amid expectations for further interest rate hikes. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose as much as 0.7%, with TSMC and Sony Group among the major contributors to the climb. Equities gained in Vietnam, Taiwan and Australia, while those in Indonesia fell. Speculation that the Bank of Japan may raise borrowing costs even more buoyed Japan’s financial stocks. Analysts said the yen’s continued weakness remains a tailwind for equities, even though the currency gained slightly overnight following comments by the finance minister.  The onshore benchmark CSI 300 Index climbed 0.2%, despite a downgrade by Citi on Chinese equities to neutral from overweight on less favorable earnings revisions and a lackluster macro outlook. 

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is down 0.4%, falling for a second day and trading at the lowest since early October. The kiwi has overtaken the yen as the G-10 outperformer, rising 0.8% against the greenback. The yen is up 0.7%, dragging USD/JPY back below 156 after another round of jawboning from Japan’s Finance Minister. The Hungarian forint falls 0.2% after Economy Minister Nagy renewed his calls for lower interest rates.

Those moves came as the dollar headed for its weakest annual performance in eight years, with the options market signaling that traders are bracing for further losses. The currency is down 8.3% this year, on track for its biggest slide since 2017. Another modest dip would mark its worst year in at least two decades. Options pricing has also turned more negative, with so-called risk reversals, which track positioning and sentiment, showing options traders are the most bearish in three months.

“The structural drivers of US dollar weakness remain intact,” wrote Patrick Brenner, chief investment officer of multi-asset at Schroders Plc. “Institutional credibility continues to erode, fiscal deficits are widening, and global reserve managers remain steady buyers of gold rather than US dollar assets.”

In rates, treasuries advance, pushing US 10-year yields down 2 bps to 4.14%. European government bonds outperform.US yields richer by 1bp to 3bp across the curve in a bull flattening move, tightening 2s10s and 5s30s spreads by 1bp and 1.2bp on the day. Treasury 10-year yields trade around 4.14%, richer by 2.5bp on the day with bunds and gilts outperforming by an additional 1.5bp and 2bp in the sector. The Treasury is selling $70 billion 5-year notes at 1pm New York, with this week’s issuance concluding with $44 billion 7-year notes Wednesday. Ahead of today’s sale, the WI 5-year yield is about 3.705% which is ~14bp cheaper than the November stop-out

In commodities, gold and silver rise 0.9% each, having notched fresh record highs earlier. Copper also hits a record above $12,000 a ton. Brent was near $62 a barrel after rising about 5% over the previous four sessions as the US continued its blockade of crude shipments from Venezuela.Bitcoin falls 0.5%.

Today's economic calendar includes ADP weekly employment change (8:15am), 3Q GDP (8:30am), November industrial production (9:15am), December Richmond Fed manufacturing index, consumer confidence (10am

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini little changed
  • Nasdaq 100 mini little changed
  • Russell 2000 mini little changed
  • Stoxx Europe 600 +0.2%
  • DAX +0.2%
  • CAC 40 -0.1%
  • 10-year Treasury yield -2 basis points at 4.15%
  • VIX little changed at 14.04
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index -0.4% at 1201.58
  • euro +0.3% at $1.1796
  • WTI crude little changed at $58.03/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • Pill Version of Wegovy Is Approved for Use in the US: WSJ
  • Japan issues sternest intervention warning, says yen deviating from fundamentals: RTRS
  • China’s Sprint for Tech Dominance Can’t Hide an Economy Full of Holes: WSJ
  • Car Payments Now Average More Than $750 a Month. Enter the 100-Month Loan: WSJ
  • Copper Hits $12,000 for First Time as Tariff Trade Upends Market: BBG
  • Silver rises above $70/oz for the first time ever, gold rises to record $4500
  • Russian air attack on Ukraine kills three and sparks sweeping outages: RTRS
  • Ukraine's Zelenskiy says several draft documents ready after Miami talks: RTRS
  • South Africans dragged into Russia's war in Ukraine dig trenches, dodge bullets: RTRS
  • Russian Oil Stuck at Sea Booms as Tanker Logjams in Asia Expand: BBG
  • Trump is mulling giving 775 acres of federal wildlife refuge to SpaceX: NYT.
  • DOJ Releases Fresh Tranche of Epstein Files as Pressure Mounts: BBG
  • A Small Nebraska Town Is Reeling From the Exit of Meatpacking Giant Tyson: WSJ
  • Retail investors to have more sway over Wall Street after record year: RTRS
  • The AI Boom Is Making Real-Estate Investors Rich—and Exposing Them to Risk: WSJ
  • Trump’s First-Term Trust Buster Is Now Working to Get Paramount Its Deal: WSJ

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks eventually traded mixed after initially taking their cue from Wall Street, although volumes and news flow remained subdued as markets wound down for the holiday period. ASX 200 was underpinned by strength in gold miners after the yellow metal printed a fresh all-time high near USD 4,500/oz, supported by a softer USD and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Nikkei 225 initially saw shallower gains than peers as a firmer yen, following official jawboning, capped upside for the index, whilst further gains in the JPY later took the index into the red. KOSPI extended its tech-led rally, with Samsung Electronics shares pushing toward near all-time highs. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp initially tracked the broader risk tone, while fresh region-specific catalysts remained scarce. Hang Seng later gave up earlier gains.

Top Asian News

  • Japanese Finance Minister Katayama declines to comment on forex levels or interest rates, and said Japan will take appropriate action and reiterates they have a "free hand" to respond to excessive moves in the JPY. FX moves after the BoJ press conference are speculative and not reflecting fundamentals. The market has stabilised somewhat since yesterday.

European bourses are mixed, with macro newsflow light. On the micro side, Novo Nordisk (+6.7%) said its oral Wegovy pill has been approved in the US for weight management after showing 16.6% weight loss in the OASIS 4 trial, and it plans a US launch in January 2026. European sectors have opened mixed with a slight positive bias. Health Care (+1.1%), to no surprise, leads due to gains in Novo Nordisk (+6.7%) after US approval of its weight-management drug. Utilities (+0.4%) and Food, Beverage and Tobacco (+0.4%) are also near the top, however, this is likely a rebound from yesterday’s underperformance. Banks (-0.3%), Consumer Products & Services (-0.3%) and Construction (-0.2%) lag, with little fresh newsflow driving moves.

Top European News

  • EU is preparing checks on imported plastics and other measures to shore up its recycling industry, according to FT.
  • European Car Sales +2.4% to 1.08mln vehicles in November, according to Bloomberg citing ACEA.
  • Novo Nordisk (NOVOB DC) said Wegovy pill is approved in the US as the first oral GLP-1 treatment for weight management after showing 16.6% weight loss in the Oasis 4 trial, and said it plans to launch the drug in the US in January 2026. US-listed NOVO shares +5% after market. Eli Lilly -1.2% after market.
  • US President Trump said he told French President Macron that France has to raise its drug prices.

Central Banks

  • RBA Minutes: Board discussed whether a rate increase might be needed at some point in 2026; holding the cash rate steady for some time could be sufficient to keep the economy in balance. October CPI suggested a risk that Q4 inflation could also be higher than forecast. The board discussed whether a rate increase might be needed at some point in 2026. Recent data suggested risks to inflation had lifted to the upside. The board judged it was too early to know whether the rise in inflation would prove persistent. The board said it would take a little longer to assess the persistence of inflation. Holding the cash rate steady for some time could be sufficient to keep the economy in balance. Policy would be assessed at future meetings, with Q4 inflation data available before the February meeting. Some board members felt conditions were no longer restrictive, while others felt they were a little restrictive. The impact of the recent rise in bond yields on financial conditions needed to be assessed. The economy was operating with excess demand and it was not clear if financial conditions were tight enough. The labour market was judged to still be a little tight, with the output gap positive. The full impact of policy easing earlier in the year was yet to be felt. Measures of capacity utilisation pointed to supply constraints. Little immediate action in AUD or ASX 200.

FX

  • DXY is lower and trades at the bottom end of a 97.88 to 98.23 range; really not much driving things for the USD recently, with newsflow exceptionally light, but perhaps facilitated by a strong JPY (see below). Nonetheless, traders will keep a keen eye out for Q3 GDP Advance/PCE, as well as Durable Goods (Oct), due at the same time.
  • JPY is amongst the outperformers, with the strength seemingly a continuation of the price action seen following fresh jawboning from Finance Minister Katayama; as a reminder, she said that they have a “free hand” to take bold action in the FX market if needed. USD/JPY drifted lower from an overnight high of 157.07, down below the 156.00 mark, where the pair currently resides.
  • Antipodeans also gained throughout overnight trade and into the European session, boosted by ongoing strength in metals prices (XAU now eyeing USD 4.5k/oz to the upside). Earlier, the Aussie showed little reaction to the RBA minutes, which indicated the Board debated whether a rate increase might be required at some point in 2026. Elsewhere, for the Kiwi specifically, NZD/USD breached 0.58 to the upside, which allowed the pair extend beyond the level, which can explain some of the outperformance this morning.
  • The GBP and EUR are steady vs the broadly weaker USD. Really not much driving things for either at the moment; the single currency really only has geopolitical updates to digest heading into the Christmas holidays. For Cable, the pair extended beyond the 1.3500 mark to make a peak of 1.3518; the next level to the upside includes the October 1 high at 1.3527.

Fixed Income

  • 10yr JGB futures outperformed, firmer by over 40 ticks at best, while the yen simultaneously reversed its early-week weakness following verbal jawboning from Japanese Finance Minister Katayama. JGB futures then rose further after Japanese PM Takaichi said Japan's national debt is still high, and rejected any "irresponsible bond issuance or tax cuts", via a Nikkei interview.
  • USTs follow JGBs higher, with a lack of domestic newsflow helping things for the benchmark. Currently trading higher by a handful of ticks, and towards the upper end of a 112-11+ to 112-15+ range. Ahead, focus turns to some key US data points, which include US GDP Advance/PCE (Q3) and Durable Goods.
  • Bunds, Gilts and OATs also follow suit. For the latter, OATs remain in focus after yesterday's cabinet meeting made the use of Article 49.3 more likely. For the near-term fiscal needs, the Assembly and Senate are set to finish debating and then adopt text to allow the government to continue financing basic public services into early-2026, despite the absence of a 2026 budget deal. A point that has contributed to OAT strength, as the benchmark marginally outmuscles Bunds, causing the OAT-Bund 10yr yield spread to probe 70bps to the downside.
  • China's Finance Ministry expects aggregate government bond issuance to remain "elevated" in 2026, according to Reuters citing sources.

Commodities

  • WTI and Brent chop around USD 58/bbl and USD 62/bbl, respectively, in tight ranges as crude benchmarks consolidate following Monday’s bid higher. Geopolitics has resurfaced in recent sessions as the near-term driver for crude prices, with tensions between the US and Venezuela rising and a potential escalation between Israel and Iran. However, a lack of updates throughout the APAC session has led to a muted start to Tuesday’s session.
  • Spot XAU has followed on from Monday's trend, peaking just shy of USD 4500/oz as the European morning gets underway, with rising geopolitical tensions acting as a new driver for the yellow metal. The recent US-Venezuela developments, specifically the blockaded oil tankers, have urged investors to look for safer places to place their investments.
  • 3M LME Copper traded muted in a tight c. USD 60/t band throughout APAC trade, seemingly not benefiting from the further extension in gold and silver prices. As the European session gets underway, the red metal lifted as the positive risk tone in equities fed through into copper. Thus far, 3M LME Copper trades just shy of the ATH formed in Monday’s session, currently at USD 11.98k/t.
  • China crude steel output in November 69.6mln tonnes, -10.9% Y/Y; global crude steel output in November 140.1mln tonnes, -4.6% Y/Y, via WorldSteel.
  • Thai Central Bank Chief said there will be a set maximum trading volumes per major gold trader.
  • Thailand's Finance Minister is looking to implement a tax on gold trading online.

Geopolitics

  • Russia's Ryabkov said Russia and US held new round of talks on 'Irritants'; main issues remain unresolved, via IFX. New round of contacts may take place in early spring.
  • Polish Armed Forces said they have scrambled jets following Russian strikes on Ukraine.
  • Russia is again attacking Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, according to Ukraine’s energy ministry.
  • Russia conducts airstrikes on Ukrainian capital Kyiv, according to Ukraine's military.
  • Ukrainian President Zelensky said "Negotiations to end the war are "close to achieving a result", according to Sky News Arabia.
  • Russia's Kremlin states Ukraine peace talks over the weekend did not achieve breakthrough.
  • Russia needs to understand to what extent the US work with Ukraine and Europe on peace plan corresponds to spirit of earlier Putin-Trump Alaska summit, via TASS.
  • Odesa regional governor said Russian forces launch new evening drone attack on Ukraine's Odesa, damaging port facilities and civilian ship.
  • "Israel's Channel 12: Israel fears miscalculation with Iran, assures Washington that it will not take risks", via Sky News Arabia.

US Event Calendar

  • 8:30 am: US Oct. Durable Goods Orders, est. -1.5%, prior 0.5%
  • 8:30 am: US 3Q GDP Annualized QoQ, est. 3.2%, prior 3.8%
  • 8:30: US 3Q GDP Price Index, est. 2.7%, prior 2.1%
  • 8:30 am: US 3Q Personal Consumption, est. 2.7%, prior 2.5%
  • 10 am: US Dec. Richmond Fed Index, est. -10, prior -1

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

This is the last EMR of 2025, before we resume normal service again on January 2. Many thanks for reading and for your interactions this year and wishing you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Markets broadly saw another risk-on move yesterday, with the S&P 500 (+0.64%) posting a third consecutive gain that left the index less than half a percent beneath its record high. However, the global bond sell-off showed few signs of relenting either, with yields reaching new milestones across several countries. The biggest story was undoubtedly the Japanese move, where the 10yr yield (+6.2bps) closed at 2.07% yesterday, the highest since 1999. But that was echoed around the world and yesterday saw 10yr bund yields (+0.2bps) inch above their March peak to close at 2.90%, marking their highest level since October 2023. That ratchet higher for yields is a significant story given that the fiscal picture is likely to remain a big theme in 2026, with many countries running budget deficits on a scale that’s rare outside of wars or major recessions.

As a reminder on Japan, yields increased sharply after the Bank of Japan’s 25bp rate hike on Friday morning, given they signalled that more rate hikes were still to come. Interestingly though, we then saw a decent bout of FX weakness, which in turn led to uncertainty about even more hikes, given the potential need to offset that inflationary impulse. However, that FX weakness began to stabilise yesterday, as finance minister Satsuki Katayama said in a Bloomberg interview yesterday that Japan had a “free hand” to take action in the FX markets, and that “The moves were clearly not in line with fundamentals but rather speculative”. So the yen strengthened after those headlines came out and was up +0.44% against the US dollar yesterday, and this morning it’s the top-performing G10 currency, strengthening a further +0.66% against the US dollar. Our FX strategist Mallika Sachdeva has written more about what happens now in Japan and she says that it makes sense for policymakers to look for measures to stabilise FX

This morning, we’ve seen some of those bond moves begin to ease as well, with yields on 10yr Japanese (-4.4bps) and Australian (-3.2bps) yields coming down, alongside those on 10yr Treasuries (-0.8bps). That comes as Japan’s PM Takaichi said in an interview today that she wouldn’t implement “irresponsible” tax cuts. Meanwhile, there’ve been further equity gains across Asia, with the CSI 300 (+0.51%), the Shanghai Comp (+0.34%) the Hang Seng (+0.18%) and the KOSPI (+0.30%) all advancing. The one exception has been the Nikkei (-0.27%) amidst an underperformance from tech stocks, but other Japanese indices like the TOPIX (+0.19%) are still higher this morning.

Otherwise yesterday, the bond sell-off was a big story outside of Japan too. For instance, in Europe 10yr bund yields (+0.2bps) hit their highest since October 2023 at 2.90%, taking them above their peak in March shortly after the fiscal stimulus announcements. They had been even higher at the intraday peak, but that was pared back after we heard from Isabel Schnabel of the ECB’s Executive Board. She said that “At the moment, no interest-rate increase is to be expected in the foreseeable future”. That was significant, because it was Ms. Schnabel who’d said earlier this month that she was “rather comfortable” with expectations about the next move being a hike, which led investors to price in a growing probability that would happen as soon as 2026. But after the latest interview, investors dialled back the likelihood of a 2026 rate hike even further, and the more policy-sensitive 2yr German yield (-0.6bps) ultimately closed slightly lower.

For US Treasuries, it was mostly a similar story of higher yields yesterday. That came as futures slightly dialled back their expectations for rate cuts next year, now pricing in 58bps by the Dec 2026 meeting, down from 60bps on Friday. In part, that was thanks to the ongoing rebound in oil prices, as that renewed concerns about inflationary pressures, with Brent crude (+2.65%) posting a 4th consecutive increase to $62.07/bbl. And we’d also heard from Cleveland Fed President Hammack over the weekend, who said her base case was that “we can stay here for some period of time until we get clearer evidence that either inflation is coming back down to target, or the employment side is weakening more materially”. So by the close, the 10yr yield (+1.6bps) was up to 4.16%, and notably, the 10yr real yield (+2.5bps) was up to 1.91%, its highest level in 4 months.

Yet despite that rise in nominal and real yields, which normally dampen investor appetite for precious metals that pay no interest, the rally for gold and silver continued to power forward yesterday. By the close, gold (+2.41%) had hit a new record of $4,444/oz, and silver (+2.80%) was also at a new peak of $69.04/oz. Moreover, both have seen further gains this morning, with gold up another +0.78% to $4,478/oz, whilst silver (+0.53%) is up to $69/40/oz. So that now brings their YTD gains to 71% and 140% respectively, which in both cases is their strongest annual performance since 1979.

In the meantime, US equities put in a decent performance as well, with the S&P 500 (+0.64%) back into positive territory for December again. So that currently leaves it on track for an 8th consecutive monthly gain for the first time since January 2018. The advance yesterday was its third consecutive move higher, and it was a broad-based move that saw over three-quarters of the index advance. Moreover, the Magnificent 7 (+0.54%) also posted a third consecutive gain to close just over 1% beneath its own record high. However, in Europe, the picture wasn’t quite as rosy, with the STOXX 600 (-0.13%) posting a modest decline.

Looking forward, today we’ll see the last batch of US data before Christmas. That includes the delayed Q3 GDP print, although that’s backward-looking and covers the period before the shutdown. However, a more recent piece of data will be the Conference Board’s consumer confidence reading for December. Remember that in November, the last reading was the lowest since the Liberation Day turmoil in April, so that will be in the spotlight given the recent downtick in sentiment indicators.

Finally on the day ahead, aside from the Q3 GDP and the Conference Board reading, today’s US data releases include industrial production for November, preliminary durable goods orders for October, and the Richmond Fed’s manufacturing index. Otherwise from central banks, the Bank of Canada will publish their summary of deliberations for the December policy decision.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 08:29

ADP Weekly Employment Data Shows Labor Market Rebounding In December

ADP Weekly Employment Data Shows Labor Market Rebounding In December

Since the start of the government shutdown, what labor market data indications we got actually surprised to the upside (while soft survey data crashed)...

...but now, as the data starts to re-emerge from its slumber, it remains mixed with jobless claims data remaining solid to say the least while JOLTS leaves questions about the low-hire, low-fire, low-quits economy. If one data set has bee noisy through the past few weeks, it's ADP (and its new weekly updated prints). Analysts expected a 16.25k average job gain per week over the past four weeks... but the print was just +11.5k (46k on a monthly basis) for the week-ending Dec 6th, with the prior week's average revised up strongly to +17.5k (+70k monthly).

Source: Bloomberg

That is the third straight week of month-over-month gains for the labor market after a brief slump as the government shutdown started.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 08:22

The Challenge For 2026 Markets

The Challenge For 2026 Markets

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

It’s that time of year when Wall Street polishes up its crystal balls and begins predicting returns for 2026. Since Wall Street never predicts a down year, which would be unwise for fee-based product revenues, these forecasts are often inaccurate and sometimes significantly wrong. Let’s review some previous years. For example, on December 7th, 2021, we wrote an article about the predictions for 2022.

“There is one thing about Goldman Sachs that is always consistent; they are ‘bullish.’ Of course, given that the market is positive more often than negative, it ‘pays’ to be bullish when your company sells products to hungry investors. It is important to remember that Goldman Sachs was wrong when it was most important, particularly in 2000 and 2008. However, in keeping with its traditional bullishness, Goldman’s chief equity strategist David Kostin forecasted the S&P 500 will climb by 9% to 5100 at year-end 2022. As he notes, such will “reflect a prospective total return of 10% including dividends.”

The problem, of course, is that the S&P 500 did NOT end the year at 5100.

Then, in 2022, Wall Street predicted a modest return of just 3.9% for 2023.

Of course, reality turned out to be markedly different.

The same trend was observed in 2023, 2024, and 2025 as Wall Street grossly underestimated the forward market return. Heading into 2025, Wall Street predicted a median return of just 8.2% with the highest estimate of nearly 15%. As we wrap up the year, the market is again closing in on a 20% return, marking the third consecutive year of such performance.

However, while analysts repeatedly fail at the guessing game, Wall Street’s annual tradition is always of higher returns. To borrow a quote:

“(Market) Predictions Are Difficult…Especially When They Are About The Future” – Niels Bohr

Okay, I took a little poetic license, but the point is that while we try, predicting the future is difficult at best and impossible at worst. If we could accurately predict the future, fortune tellers would win all the lotteries, psychics would be more prosperous than Elon Musk, and portfolio managers would always beat the index.

However, this is never the case, and as investors, we must rely on our data, analyze past events, filter out the current noise, and discern possible future outcomes. The biggest problem with Wall Street today and in the past is its consistent disregard for the unexpected and random events that inevitably occur, like the “Liberation Day” tariff event that sent the market plunging by nearly 20%. However, even when such events occur frequently, from trade wars to Brexit to Fed policy and a global pandemic, Wall Street analysts were often convinced that such things would not happen.

So what about 2026? We have some early indications of Wall Street targets for the S&P 500 index, and, as is always the case, they are primarily optimistic for the coming year. The median estimate for 2026 is for the market to rise to 7500 next year, which would be a disappointing return of just 9.3% after three years of 20% gains. However, the high estimate from Deutsche Bank suggests a 15% return, while the low estimate from BofA is just 4%. Notably, not one firm forecasts a negative return.

There are several risks to these forecasts.

The Challenge For 2026

As of this writing, the market appears poised to close the year above 6,800. That’s roughly a 17% percent gain for the year based on price appreciation. That advance was a combination of AI-fueled enthusiasm, softening inflation, and hopes of Fed rate cuts and increased liquidity. However, under the surface, the setup for 2026 looks increasingly fragile. Valuations are stretched, expectations are optimistic, and earnings have little room for error.

Let’s start with the data. The current trailing twelve-month price-to-earnings ratio sits at 26, near historic extremes. The Shiller CAPE ratio, which adjusts for inflation and smooths cycles over a decade, stands near 39. Forward P/E estimates for 2026 earnings are in the 23 range. By almost every measure, equities are priced at levels that historically limit future returns.

However, this also presents a risk that investors need to be prepared for. At current valuation levels, stocks don’t need a crisis to fall; they only need disappointment. If growth falls short, or if the Fed doesn’t deliver the cuts the market expects, equities face pressure. In other words, a “recession” is not the risk; it is just anything that is “less than perfect.”

Wall Street, of course, is bullish. That’s the default setting. Morgan Stanley is calling for a 14 percent gain. Goldman Sachs projects double-digit earnings growth. Deutsche Bank has a target of 8,000 for the S&P 500. But look closer. These forecasts assume strong profit growth, stable inflation, and rate cuts starting in mid-2026, which is a very tight window.

However, investors have heard this before, but have also seen what happens when markets get ahead of reality. That leaves the setup for 2026 a little less bullish, as elevated expectations and high valuations leave minimal margin for error.

Valuation Math: What the Numbers Suggest for 2026

To make sense of where the S&P 500 could go in 2026, we don’t need a prediction, just a calculator. Rather than guessing, we prefer to let “valuations do the talking.” The reason is that valuations represent investor sentiment based on the outlook for earnings growth. If forward earnings growth is strong, investors can overpay for equities today, anticipating that earnings will justify the overpayment. However, if earnings expectations start to fall, investors will reprice the markets for lower premiums.

As shown below, we ran multiple scenarios based on forward earnings estimates, valuation ranges, and historical outcomes. The S&P 500 begins the year near 6,900, our base case, and from there, outcomes depend on whether multiples expand, hold, or contract. For the earnings analysis, we are using S&P Global’s forward 2026 reported earnings per share estimate of $282, which will likely be the high-water mark for 2026. Therefore, we will assume that these estimates are accurate, and we can then incorporate valuation multiples and predict forward market returns.

Here are the scenarios, based on $282 per share: (Note: There are an infinite number of possibilities that could occur in 2026. The point of the following discussion is to understand the math of valuations as it relates to market risk next year.)

Optimistic Case (Multiple Expansion): Bullish investor sentiment persists, and risk-taking intensifies, resulting in a multiple expansion to 29x. Such a prediction would suggest a figure close to Deutsche Bank’s current 2026 estimate of 8,000 as a year-end target. As shown, at 29 times earnings, the year target would be $ 8,185, or a roughly 18% gain.

Neutral Case (Maintain Current Multiples): This scenario assumes that, while the bullish market persists, concerns over monetary policy, inflation, or earnings growth rates will keep multiples stable at 26x forward earnings. Such a scenario would allow the index to rise to 7,338, representing a more historically normal 6% gain in 2026. Such a muted return will be very disappointing after three years of nearly 20% gains.

Slow-Down Case: If we assume an economic slowdown that impacts forward earnings expectations, such a scenario would potentially lead to a reversion in valuations toward its 5-year average of 22x. Such a decline would likely result in a market value of 6,209, or a negative return of approximately 10%.

Recession Case: The most likely worst-case outcome, barring a financial or credit-related event next year, is the onset of a mild recession. While such an event is likely a low-probability occurrence in 2026, a scenario like this would likely lead to more severe earnings disappointment and market repricing. If such were to occur, a valuation contraction toward 18 times earnings is possible, with a price decline in the index towards 5080, taking markets back to the 2021 peak, or a 26% correction.

Notice this: even a mild reversion in valuations creates downside. If earnings flatten and multiples fall to 20, that’s enough to limit or erase gains. If both earnings and valuations fall short, returns turn negative fast. This makes managing risk less simple in 2026. While high valuations reduce forward returns, they do not guarantee losses. However, high valuations leave “no cushion” if things go sideways.

This is not a time for aggressive positioning. It’s a time to respect the math.

Risk Factors: What Could Go Wrong in 2026

Markets don’t move in straight lines. The problem with 2026 isn’t a forecast. It’s the imbalance between expectations and risk. Everything must go right for stocks to deliver strong returns from current levels. But there’s plenty that could go wrong. As shown in the table below, since 2009, investors have enjoyed annualized real returns in the market that are 50% higher than the historic returns from 1900 to the present. Those returns were a function of near-zero interest rates, massive liquidity injections, and a valuation reversion following the 2008 crisis. None of those supports is currently available as we head into 2026.

Here is another risk. The current 3-year return is 18% above its 3-year average. While that is not the highest level on record, when the index trades significantly above its moving average, volatility tends to rise. These periods often see sharp drawdowns, and corrections become more frequent, with increased variance in returns leading to larger losses in downturns, which compounds the problem. Secondly, there are declining risk-adjusted returns. When returns deviate significantly from the trend, future returns tend to revert toward the mean. This mean reversion is driven by stretched valuations resetting. Over time, high volatility and large price swings reduce compound returns. Even if average returns remain positive, the math of compounding is compromised by losses, weakening full-cycle gains.

Secondly, the economy is forecasted to grow around 2 percent, but there are signs of slowing. With consumer debt levels rising, delinquency rates on credit cards and auto loans inching higher, and student loan repayments resuming, those factors weigh on discretionary spending.

Third, while the Fed is cutting rates, investors have already priced those cuts into the market. However, inflation remains sticky, wage growth is still elevated, and jobless claims remain near lows. As such, if the Fed hesitates or signals fewer cuts, this could pressure valuation multiples, especially for growth stocks.

Fourth, consensus earnings remain extremely optimistic in relation to expectations for economic growth and inflation. That requires strong margins, global stability, and continued AI-driven demand. If any of these falter, earnings estimates will fall, and investors will reprice markets for lower multiples.

Finally, the 2025 rally was led by a small group of stocks with only about 37% of all issues outperforming the index. If leadership narrows or stalls, the index could struggle even if broader conditions remain stable.

Investors should also watch geopolitical risk. U.S. midterm elections, global conflict, or supply chain issues could disrupt assumptions; however, these are secondary concerns. The core issue remains earnings versus valuation. The higher the price you pay, the smaller the margin for error.

While this market is priced for a smooth glide path, the odds of turbulence are rising.

Strategy: What Investors Should Do Next

The playbook for 2026 isn’t about guessing market direction. It’s about managing risk, and understanding that with valuations high, earnings uncertain, and monetary policy in transition, your best move is preparation, not prediction.

The chart below combines the four potential predictions to show the possible market range for next year. Of course, you can analyze, make valuation assumptions, and derive your targets for next year based on your views. This analysis is an exercise in logic to develop a range of possibilities and probabilities over the next 12 months.

Valuations matter. At this stage of the cycle, you need to be more cautious—not more aggressive. Here’s how to position:

  • Lower your return expectations. If you’re assuming another 15 to 20 percent gain next year, you’re betting against the data. Valuation history suggests forward returns will be lower, especially if earnings growth slows. A more reasonable expectation is mid-single-digit returns, with higher volatility.
  • Reduce exposure to sectors with extreme valuations. AI might be real, but prices already assume perfection. Don’t abandon growth, but rotate toward quality. Look for companies with real cash flow, low leverage, and strong pricing power.
  • Focus on quality. Companies with strong cash flow, low debt, and pricing power are likely to outperform in slower-growth environments.
  • Increase Fixed Income. High-quality fixed income will shield portfolios against increased market volatility.
  • Hold some cash. Not because you’re timing the market, but because flexibility matters. If volatility spikes, you want dry powder. That also gives you a chance to buy quality at a discount if the market pulls back.
  • Most importantly, stop chasing narratives. AI is real, but that doesn’t make every AI stock a buy. The same goes for the “soft landing” story. Focus on the numbers. Stick with fundamentals.

In 2026, outcomes will depend on earnings, inflation, and the actions of the Fed. However, your results will vary based on your risk-management discipline, allocations, and portfolio structure. As such, it is important not to overreach, not to assume past returns will repeat, and to respect valuations.

That’s how you protect capital, and ultimately stay in the game when others can’t.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/23/2025 - 08:05

Pages